CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01890525PROMISE-SAFERUpdated Dec 6, 2019

PROMISE Substudy to Assess For Effective Dose of Radiation (PROMISE-SAFER) Specific Aim 3b

An observational study in Chest Pain, Coronary Artery Disease and Angina, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-06.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare different methods of collecting the amount of radiation exposure patients receive in a clinical study. As part of the PROMISE study, the Duke Clinical Research Institute Outcomes and Follow-up Group will be contacting patients every six months to ask if they had any heart procedures or testing. This information will be used to estimate the amount of radiation that they may have received from heart testing being studied in this study, PROMISE-SAFER. Patients will be asked to collect information about each heart testing they receive during the time that they are enrolled in the PROMISE study. At the conclusion of the study, we will be able to determine which method was most accurate in collecting the amount of radiation exposure for this clinical study. Through this study we hope to develop an improved methodology to estimate cumulative radiation exposure from cardiac imaging. Comprehensive measurement of cumulative radiation exposure to patients may be critically important to minimize potential harm in future studies and in clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Pain
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Angina

Keywords

  • radiation
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 336 across 1,947 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 385 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

PROMISE study patients

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: All patients who meet inclusion criteria and enroll in the parent PROMISE study will be eligible to participate in PROMISE-SAFER.

  1. New or worsening chest pain syndrome or equivalent symptoms suspicious for clinically significant coronary artery disease
  2. No prior evaluation for this episode of symptoms
  3. Planned non-invasive testing for evaluation of possible coronary artery disease
  4. Men age > 55 and women age ≥65 years
  5. If age in men 45 - 54 or women 50 - 64 years, then must have increased probability of CAD due to EITHER:

    A. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) requiring medical treatment OR Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) defined as documented >50% peripheral arterial stenosis treated medically or invasively OR Cerebrovascular disease (stroke, documented > 50% carotid stenosis treated medically or invasively)

    OR

    B. At least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors:

    • Ongoing tobacco use
    • Hypertension
    • Abnormal ankle-brachial index defined as less than \<0.9
    • Dyslipidemia
  6. Serum creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL within the past 90 days
  7. Negative urine/serum pregnancy test for female subjects of child-bearing potential and not breast-feeding

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed or suspected acute coronary syndrome requiring hospitalization or urgent or emergent testing; Elevated troponin or creatinine kinase-MB
  2. Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, or persistent resting chest pain felt to be ischemic despite adequate therapy)
  3. Known coronary artery disease with prior myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or any angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease ≥50% lesion in a major epicardial vessel.
  4. Any invasive coronary angiography or non-invasive anatomic or functional cardiovascular test for detection of coronary artery disease, including coronary computed tomographic angiography and exercise electrocardiogram, within the previous twelve (12) months.
  5. Known significant congenital, valvular (> moderate) or cardiomyopathic process (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or reduced systolic left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%)) which could explain cardiac symptoms.
  6. Contraindication to undergoing a coronary computed tomographic angiography, including but not limited to:

    a. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

  7. Life expectancy \< 2 years
  8. Unable to provide written informed consent or participate in long-term follow-up
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • PROMISE study patients
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Methods to measure cumulative radiation exposure from a cardiac imaging trial will be compared to radiation measurements from the "gold standard" electronic medical records

    In a single site (San Jose Medical Center - Kaiser Permanente) at a health maintenance organization where patients undergo all testing on site and comprehensive radiation records are maintained, 3 approaches to obtaining follow-up radiation dosimetry estimates will be compared: 1) the standard method used at all sites of combining those procedures identified on follow-up surveys with measured or imputed procedure dose estimates, 2) Radiation Log forms that patients will receive and will be asked to complete whenever they undergo further imaging, and 3) "gold standard" review of patient electronic medical records to identify all procedures with ionizing radiation and measured dose estimates from each procedure.

    Time frame: 4 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • San Jose Medical Center - Kaiser Permanente
    San Jose, California 95119, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01890525
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
Columbia University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2013
Start date
Aug 1, 2012
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2016
Completion
Oct 15, 2019
Last update
Dec 6, 2019

Study contacts

James J Jang, MD
principal investigator · Kaiser Permanente

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion