ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01880515Updated May 11, 2025Results posted

Tetracycline as a Prophylaxis for Rash in Patients With NSCLC Receiving Treatment With BIBW2992 (Afatinib)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tetracycline in Skin Rash and Lung Cancer, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-11.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
107
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. Advanced NSCLC has a poor prognosis and the positive impact of chemotherapy is limited by the development of intrinsic and acquired resistance.
  2. Over the past decade, less toxic agents such as the innovative targeted therapies, i.e. erlotinib or gefitinib, have the potential to improve the effectiveness and keep a good quality of life with a low toxicity
  3. BIBW2992 (afatinib), an aniline-quinazoline, is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) irreversible inhibitor, and it has activity against erlotinib-resistant isoforms having mutations in EGFR and HER-2.
  4. This molecule has shown benefits as a single agent in pre-treated patients who have progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy, with a minimal toxicity compared to chemotherapy.
  5. BIBW2992 is associated with adverse effects similar to those for erlotinib and gefitinib, such as rash and diarrhea. These symptoms can reduce the quality of life (QL) in patients and lead to inconsistent EGFR inhibitor dose administration
  6. There is not a standard treatment for rash. However, case reports have tried to demonstrate the benefit in the treatment of these cutaneous injuries obtained with alcohol-free emollients, sunscreen with titanium dioxide or antibiotic (topic or oral) treatment regimens that include clindamycin or doxycycline, as well as anti-inflammatory drugs such as steroids and isotretinoin.
  7. In order to reduce the incidence and severity of cutaneous toxicities, we will compare the prophylactic antibiotic treatment using tetracycline and general dermatological recommendations versus using only dermatological recommendations, in patients initiating the treatment with BIBW2992.
Read the detailed description

Case reports have tried to demonstrate the benefit in the treatment of rash obtained with: alcohol-free emollients used 2-3 times daily, sunscreen with titanium dioxide or zinc oxide with a skin protection factor (SPF) greater than 15, topic or oral antibiotic regimens (such as clindamycin, metronidazole, tetracyclines) when there is secondary infection as well as steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (betamethasone, triamcinolone) and isotretinoin.

The objective of this project is to evaluate whether the prophylactic treatment with tetracycline can reduce dermatological toxicities such as rash, induced by the EGFR and HER-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Rash
  • Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • BIBW 2992
  • Skin Rash
  • Tetracycline
  • Afatinib
03

In context

Exanthema

68 studies on the registry are indexed under Exanthema; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 107 is above the median of 60 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Exanthema.

Browse Exanthema studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of non-operable, locally advanced, recurrent or , or cytologically documented non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB or IV).

    • Patients should have an evidence of .
    • 18 years or older
    • - Performance Status 0-3
    • At least 12 weeks of
    • Patients with non-small cell lung cancer stages IIIB/IV who have received at least one cycle of platinum-based, first or systemic standard chemotherapy, and have a documented failure for this treatment.
    • More than 2 previous chemotherapy regimens are not allowed. The patients should have recovered from any toxic effect and at least 2 weeks should have elapsed from last dose before their entry (14 days for vinorelbine and other vinca alkaloids or gemcitabine). Patients who in the investigator's opinion are fully recovered from surgery for at least 4 weeks may also be considered for the study. Patients should have recovered from any severe toxicity (CTC > 1) caused by any previous therapy.
    • Granulocyte count > 1.5x 109/L and count > 100x 109/L.
    • Serum > 1.5 (ULN)
    • and/or ALT > 2 ULN (or >5 x ULN when clearly attributable to presence of hepatic metastases).
    • Serum creatinine > 1.5 ULN or \< 60 mL/min
    • Capability to fulfill the study and follow-up procedures.
    • A negative pregnancy test should be obtained from all women of within 72 hours previous to therapy beginning.
    • Patients of should use effective methods.
    • Written (signed) to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients allergic to the antibiotic therapy used.
  • Any unsteady systemic disease (including active infection, uncontrolled hypertension, unsteady angina, congestive cardiac failure, hepatic, renal or metabolic disease).
  • A previous treatment using a systemic anti-tumor therapy with EGFR inhibitors (tyrosine kinase inhibitors).
  • Any other malignant pathology within 5 previous years (except for carcinoma in situ of cervix or basal-cell type skin cancer appropriately treated).
  • Patients with cerebral or spinal marrow compression recently diagnosed and/or definitely surgery and/or radiation naïve-treatment patients are excluded. Those with previously diagnosed and treated metastasis to Central Nervous System (CNS) or spinal marrow compression, having an evidence of steady disease (clinically steady in imaging studies) are accepted for at least 2 months.
  • Any significant ophthalmologic abnormality, especially severe dry-eye syndrome, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, Sjögren's syndrome, severe exposure keratitis and any other disorder that may increase the risk for corneal epithelial injure. Contact lens use during the study is not recommended. The decision to continue to use contact lens should be discussed with the oncologist responsible for patient treatment and the ophthalmologist.
  • Patients who cannot take oral medication, requiring intravenous nutrition, who underwent previous surgical procedures affecting absorption, or with active peptic ulcer.
  • Nursing women.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tetracycline

    Patients will receive tetracycline 250mg every 12 hours for 1 month plus general dermatological recommendations (sunscreen and emollient cream)

    Drug: Tetracycline

  • No intervention
    No Tetracycline

    This arm only with general dermatologic recommendations. Patients in this arm can receive tetracycline after week 4 of assessment only if rash grade 3-4 occur

Interventions

  • The experimental group will receive tetracycline 250mg every 12 hours for 1 month the same day at initiation of BIBW2992 whereas the non-intervention group will recieve general dermatological recomendations while on treatment with BIBW2992.

    Also known as: Tetracycline hydrocloride, Tetrex®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Participants Who Experienced Any Grade of Rash As Characterized By The Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) V4.0

    Sum of participants who experienced any grade rash according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) V4.0, from the initiation of BIBW2992 compared to week 8.

    Time frame: Percentage of adverse events at week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life (QoL)

    A QoL questionnaire from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) organization (Spanish version) will be performed at initiation of BIBW 2992 and then every month of follow-up until progression

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months

  2. Progression Free-survival

    The measure will be from the start of consumption to the first documented evidence of progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, or if patients still survive the measure will be made after 24 weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks from baseline

  3. Progression Free Survival

    From the start of consumption of BIBW 2992 to the date progression or last follow up

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment, an average of 8 weeks.

07

Results

Posted Apr 12, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTetracyclineNo Tetracycline
Started5354
Completed4545
Not completed89
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up32
Withdrew: Disease progression57

Outcome measures

PrimaryFrequency of Participants Who Experienced Any Grade of Rash As Characterized By The Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) V4.0

Sum of participants who experienced any grade rash according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) V4.0, from the initiation of BIBW2992 compared to week 8.

Time frame:
Percentage of adverse events at week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Patients w/any grade rash
Frequency of Participants Who Experienced Any Grade of Rash As Characterized By The Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) V4.0
Percentage of Patients w/any grade rashTetracyclineNo Tetracycline
Frequency of Participants Who Experienced Any Grade of Rash As Characterized By The Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) V4.044.575.5
Statistical analysis
  • Tetracycline vs No Tetracycline · Risk ratio (rr): .4 · 95% CI 0.17 to 0.99
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL)

A QoL questionnaire from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) organization (Spanish version) will be performed at initiation of BIBW 2992 and then every month of follow-up until progression

Time frame:
from baseline to 6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProgression Free-survival

The measure will be from the start of consumption to the first documented evidence of progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, or if patients still survive the measure will be made after 24 weeks

Time frame:
24 weeks from baseline

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProgression Free Survival

From the start of consumption of BIBW 2992 to the date progression or last follow up

Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment, an average of 8 weeks.
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival
monthsTetracyclineNo Tetracycline
Progression Free Survival8.1 (1.7 to 14.3)12.3 (7.1 to 17.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Tetracycline vs No Tetracycline · Log Rank · p = 0.41

Adverse events

Collected over All patients were followed-up, every two weeks for skin toxicities by a dermatologist since the start of treatment with afatinib, until the fourth week.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tetracycline—0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)
No Tetracycline—0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

A total of 107 patients were enrolled. Due to progression and lost to follow-up, only 90 patients were evaluated for dermatological toxicities. Forty five patients were assigned to receive reactive treatment; the other 45 received pre-emptive tetracycline.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)TetracyclineNo TetracyclineTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years121224
>=65 years333366
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TetracyclineNo TetracyclineTotal
Mean57.5 ± 1456.6 ± 1457.05 ± 14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TetracyclineNo TetracyclineTotal
Female333366
Male121224
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TetracyclineNo TetracyclineTotal
Mexico454590
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
    Mexico City, 14080, Mexico
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Modjtahedi H, Dean C. The receptor for EGF and its ligands - expression, prognostic value and target for therapy in cancer (review). Int J Oncol. 1994 Feb;4(2):277-96. doi: 10.3892/ijo.4.2.277. PubMed 21566922 ↗
  • Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F, Normanno N. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1995 Jul;19(3):183-232. doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-i. No abstract available. PubMed 7612182 ↗
  • Rusch V, Mendelsohn J, Dmitrovsky E. The epidermal growth factor receptor and its ligands as therapeutic targets in human tumors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1996 Aug;7(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/1359-6101(96)00016-0. PubMed 8899291 ↗
  • Davies DE, Chamberlin SG. Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for therapy of carcinomas. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996 May 3;51(9):1101-10. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(95)02232-5. PubMed 8645330 ↗
  • Eskens FA, Mom CH, Planting AS, Gietema JA, Amelsberg A, Huisman H, van Doorn L, Burger H, Stopfer P, Verweij J, de Vries EG. A phase I dose escalation study of BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR) and 2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase in a 2-week on, 2-week off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;98(1):80-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604108. Epub 2007 Nov 20. PubMed 18026190 ↗
  • C. Yang, J. Shih, W. Su, Et.Al. A phase II study of BIBW 2992 in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and activating EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 2).- J Clin Oncol 28: 15s, 2010 (Suppl; Abstr 7521).
  • Yap TA, Vidal L, Adam J, Stephens P, Spicer J, Shaw H, Ang J, Temple G, Bell S, Shahidi M, Uttenreuther-Fischer M, Stopfer P, Futreal A, Calvert H, de Bono JS, Plummer R. Phase I trial of the irreversible EGFR and HER2 kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):3965-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7278. Epub 2010 Aug 2. PubMed 20679611 ↗
  • C. Yang, J. Shih, T. Chao, C. Tsai, Et.Al. Use of BIBW 2992, a novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 TKI, to induce regression in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and activating EGFR mutations: Preliminary results of a single-arm phase II clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 26: 2008
  • Veale D, Ashcroft T, Marsh C, Gibson GJ, Harris AL. Epidermal growth factor receptors in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 1987 May;55(5):513-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.104. PubMed 3038157 ↗
  • Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, Kaukel E, Roubec, Brennscheidt U, De Rosa F, Mueller B, Von Pawel J: Results of a phase III trial of erlotinib (OSI-774) combined with cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ASCO Annual Meeting 2004 abstract number 7010
  • Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, Fehrenbacher L, Johnson BE, Sandler A, Kris MG, Tran HT, Klein P, Li X, Ramies D, Johnson DH, Miller VA; TRIBUTE Investigator Group. TRIBUTE: a phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):5892-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.840. Epub 2005 Jul 25. PubMed 16043829 ↗
  • Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, Kubo S, Takahashi M, Chirieac LR, Padera RF, Shapiro GI, Baum A, Himmelsbach F, Rettig WJ, Meyerson M, Solca F, Greulich H, Wong KK. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008 Aug 7;27(34):4702-11. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.109. Epub 2008 Apr 14. PubMed 18408761 ↗
  • Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Mar;7(3):169-81. doi: 10.1038/nrc2088. PubMed 17318210 ↗
  • Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Janne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, Johnson BE, Eck MJ, Tenen DG, Halmos B. EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 24;352(8):786-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044238. PubMed 15728811 ↗
  • Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, Inserra E, Diederichs S, Iafrate AJ, Bell DW, Digumarthy S, Muzikansky A, Irimia D, Settleman J, Tompkins RG, Lynch TJ, Toner M, Haber DA. Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 24;359(4):366-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800668. Epub 2008 Jul 2. PubMed 18596266 ↗
  • Takezawa K, Okamoto I, Tanizaki J, Kuwata K, Yamaguchi H, Fukuoka M, Nishio K, Nakagawa K. Enhanced anticancer effect of the combination of BIBW2992 and thymidylate synthase-targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancer with the T790M mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010 Jun;9(6):1647-56. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-1009. Epub 2010 Jun 8. PubMed 20530710 ↗
  • Rudin CM, Liu W, Desai A, Karrison T, Jiang X, Janisch L, Das S, Ramirez J, Poonkuzhali B, Schuetz E, Fackenthal DL, Chen P, Armstrong DK, Brahmer JR, Fleming GF, Vokes EE, Carducci MA, Ratain MJ. Pharmacogenomic and pharmacokinetic determinants of erlotinib toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1119-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1128. PubMed 18309947 ↗
  • Collen G., Vos L.E., Laurijsen A., Clasificación y tratamiento de los efectos secundarios de los inhibidorres del receptor de factor de crecimiento epidérmico (EGFR) en piel, pelo, uñas y mucosas. European Journal of Cancer. 2007, Vol 43: 845-851
  • Lacouture ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Oct;6(10):803-12. doi: 10.1038/nrc1970. PubMed 16990857 ↗
  • Topham E. Cutaneous manifestations of cancer and chemotherapy. Clin Med (Lond). 2009 Aug;9(4):375-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-4-375. No abstract available. PubMed 19728518 ↗
  • Wacker B, Nagrani T, Weinberg J, Witt K, Clark G, Cagnoni PJ. Correlation between development of rash and efficacy in patients treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in two large phase III studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 1;13(13):3913-21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2610. PubMed 17606725 ↗
  • Hammond-Thelin LA. Cutaneous reactions related to systemic immunomodulators and targeted therapeutics. Dermatol Clin. 2008 Jan;26(1):121-59, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2007.08.010. PubMed 18023775 ↗
  • Hu JC, Sadeghi P, Pinter-Brown LC, Yashar S, Chiu MW. Cutaneous side effects of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Feb;56(2):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Dec 1. PubMed 17141360 ↗
  • Arrieta O, Vega-Gonzalez MT, Lopez-Macias D, Martinez-Hernandez JN, Bacon-Fonseca L, Macedo-Perez EO, Ramirez-Tirado LA, Flores-Estrada D, de la Garza-Salazar J. Randomized, open-label trial evaluating the preventive effect of tetracycline on afatinib induced-skin toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 2015 Jun;88(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Mar 28. PubMed 25882778 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2010, a primary completion of Jul 2014 and a completion of Nov 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2017, 2 years 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 31, 2013
First posted
Jun 19, 2013
Start
Dec 2010
Primary completionActual
Jul 2014
CompletionActual
Nov 2014
Results first posted
Apr 12, 2017
Last update
May 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01880515
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Responsible party
Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodríguez (M.D., M.Sc., Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2013
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Nov 2014
Results posted
Apr 12, 2017
Last update
May 11, 2025

Study contacts

Oscar Arrieta, M.D., M.Sc.
principal investigator · Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tetracycline

Start the discussion