ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01873911Updated Nov 1, 2019

Neurobehavioral Phenotypes in MPS III

An observational study in Sanfilippo Syndrome Type A, Sanfilippo Syndrome Type B and Hurler Syndrome, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-01.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
2 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis #1: Factor analysis of the revised Sanfilippo Behavior Rating Scale (SBRS) will identify a group of externalizing behaviors and a group of Klüver-Bucy syndrome-like behaviors as two different factors that are at least partially independent.

Hypothesis #2a: Children with MPS III will show more hyperlocomotion, fearlessness, asociality and noncompliance than children of similar cognitive ability with MPS I.

Hypothesis #2b: These behaviors will become more frequent and/or intensify over time, consistent with the Cleary and Wraith (1993) model. Quantifying them will provide a more empirical framework for staging disease progression.

Hypothesis #3: Brain volumetric analysis and diffusion-tensor imaging will reveal abnormalities of frontal and temporal lobe structures that will correlate with externalizing and Klüver-Bucy syndrome-like behaviors, respectively.

Hypothesis #4. Loss of cognitive and language function as measures of neurologic decline will directly precede or co-vary with behavioral decline.

The primary objective of this study is to identify the behavioral phenotype and its neural basis in MPS III (Sanfilippo syndrome). Is the behavioral phenotype similar to that of Klüver-Bucy syndrome, and is there evidence for amygdala abnormality? The secondary objective of this research study is to develop easily administered, sensitive and specific neurobehavioral and neuroimaging markers to characterize the behavioral phenotype(s) of MPS III; to track their progression; and to delineate their neural substrates. Such markers are critical for identifying the stage of disease for each patient, and to measure treatment outcome. Although we know that severe cognitive decline is one essential characteristic of MPS III, the other highly salient characteristic is a range of abnormal and disruptive behaviors that can include, but go well beyond, childhood noncompliance and oppositionality. These behaviors set Sanfilippo syndrome apart from the other MPS disorders. They cause major disruption in the child's familial, school, and community environments. Delineating these behavioral abnormalities will help in better understanding the neurological disease.

Read the detailed description

Like some other mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) syndromes, MPS III (Sanfilippo syndrome) is characterized by a severe cognitive decline ending in dementia and death. Unlike other MPS syndromes, earlier-stage MPS III is also associated with a range of abnormal and disruptive behaviors that can include, but go well beyond, childhood noncompliance and oppositionality. These behaviors, which cause major disruption in the child's familial, school, and community environments, set MPS III apart from the other MPS disorders. These behaviors may also indicate the identity of the neural pathways affected in this disease; their sequence of onsets may indicate the order in which these pathways are affected. We propose to define and categorize the behavioral profile(s) or phenotype(s) of MPS III and correlate them with clinical quantitative neuroimaging in order to understand the neural bases of the disease. In addition, we will use these results to develop a set of sensitive and specific measures that can be easily administered by health care professionals to help monitor the disease and the efficacy of future treatments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sanfilippo Syndrome Type A
  • Sanfilippo Syndrome Type B
  • Hurler Syndrome

Keywords

  • MPS IIIA
  • MPS IIIB
  • Sanfilippo syndrome type A
  • Sanfilippo syndrome type B
  • Hurler syndrome
  • cognitive decline
  • MPS IH
03

In context

Mucopolysaccharidosis III

55 studies on the registry are indexed under Mucopolysaccharidosis III; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 30 across 23 observational studies indexed under Mucopolysaccharidosis III.

Browse Mucopolysaccharidosis III studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,210 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 133 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Twenty children who have been diagnosed with MPS III type A or type B. Ten age-matched children (as controls) who have been diagnosed with MPS I (Hurler syndrome), who in the past have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation, and who have been clinically-determined to have low cognitive function.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Research Subjects: Verified diagnosis of MPS IIIA or MPS IIIB (having proof of either genetic mutation or enzymatic analysis prior to enrollment in this study); must be between the ages of 2 and 12 years; must be able to walk.

Control group: Verified diagnosis of MPS IH; must have already undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation in the past; must be aged between 2 and 5 years; and must be able to walk without support.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded who are unable to cooperate or comply with this study's procedures; in the opinion of the principal investigator, participants who have other severely-limiting co-existing conditions such as severe hearing or visual impairment, will be excluded from this study.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Temperament

    Using Risk Room procedures of the established "Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery" (Lab-TAB), the investigators will measure and record each subject's startle, exploration (fear), compliance, and attachment.

    Time frame: Within One Year of Enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Measures

    Assessments of research subjects' quality of life will be made using age-appropriate standardized assessment tools.

    Time frame: Within One Year of Enrollment

  2. Event-Related Potentials Measurement

    High-density Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) will be elicited and recorded. ERPs provide information about the timing and location of neurocognitive processes associated with the individual's processing of discrete stimuli. Two sets of stimuli will be used: 1. auditory stimuli consisting of non-language sounds and phonemes; and 2. visual stimuli consisting of images of emotional faces. All stimuli will be presented in an oddball paradigm format (repetition of stimuli with a random insertion of a novel stimulus).

    Time frame: Within One Year of Enrollment

  3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination

    To examine the neural substrate of MPS III behavioral phenotypes of participating research subjects, the investigators will perform high-resolution brain volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during clinical scans.

    Time frame: Within One Year of Enrollment

  4. Assessment of Cognitive Development

    Research subjects' cognitive development will be assessed using age-appropriate standardized assessment tools.

    Time frame: Within One Year of Enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cleary MA, Wraith JE. Management of mucopolysaccharidosis type III. Arch Dis Child. 1993 Sep;69(3):403-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.3.403. No abstract available. PubMed 8215557 ↗
  • Meyer A, Kossow K, Gal A, Muhlhausen C, Ullrich K, Braulke T, Muschol N. Scoring evaluation of the natural course of mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA (Sanfilippo syndrome type A). Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):e1255-61. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0282. Epub 2007 Oct 15. PubMed 17938166 ↗
  • Jha S, Patel R. Kluver-Bucy syndrome -- an experience with six cases. Neurol India. 2004 Sep;52(3):369-71. PubMed 15472430 ↗
  • Angrilli A, Mauri A, Palomba D, Flor H, Birbaumer N, Sartori G, di Paola F. Startle reflex and emotion modulation impairment after a right amygdala lesion. Brain. 1996 Dec;119 ( Pt 6):1991-2000. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.6.1991. PubMed 9010003 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2010, a primary completion of Jul 2014 and a completion of Aug 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 28, 2013
First posted
Jun 10, 2013
Start
Dec 2010
Primary completionActual
Jul 2014
CompletionActual
Aug 2014
Last update
Nov 1, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01873911
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2013
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Aug 2014
Last update
Nov 1, 2019

Study contacts

Elsa G Shapiro, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota
Michael Potegal, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion