CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01871090REMEDYUpdated Feb 15, 2019Results posted

Remote Device Interrogation In The Emergency Department

An interventional study of Unpaired remote monitoring transmitter in Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Disease and Heart Failure, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-15.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective, post market, non-randomized study to evaluate the reduction in time to interrogation for patients with St. Jude Medical remote care compatible devices interrogated by the unpaired Merlin@home transmitter in the Emergency Department (ED). Two sites will enroll up to 100 patients total.

Expected duration of the study is 6 months. Once enrolled the patient will participate in the study for the duration of the Emergency Department stay, until discharged or admitted to the hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Disease
  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Heart Failure
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Keywords

  • Remote Monitoring
  • Remote Care
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  • Pacemaker
  • Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

4,904 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 920 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is close to the median of 100 across 2,738 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices is the lead sponsor of 525 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Present to Emergency Department with an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator.
  2. Are 18 years of age or older, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state law.
  3. Are willing and able to provide informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Interrogation with unpaired remote transmitter

    Interrogation with an unpaired remote monitoring transmitter for devices that are compatible.

    Device: Unpaired remote monitoring transmitter

  • No intervention
    Interrogation with programmer

    Interrogation with programmer according to usual standard of care

Interventions

  • DeviceUnpaired remote monitoring transmitter

    Unpaired remote monitoring transmitter

    Also known as: St. Jude Medical Merlin@home remote monitoring transmitter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Interrogation

    Time to interrogation is defined as the time from Triage (decision to interrogate the device) until the first of: Completion of interrogation, Time of Clinical/Treatment decision, or Emergency Department check out time.

    Time frame: On day of Emergency Department admission

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Clinical/Treatment Decision

    Defined as the time from the Emergency Department Check In Time until the first of: Time of Clinical/Treatment Decision or Emergency Department Check Out Time (discharged/leaves Emergency Department or admitted to hospital).

    Time frame: On day of Emergency Department admission

Other outcomes

  1. Length of Emergency Department Stay

    Defined as the time from the Emergency Department Check In Time until the Emergency Department Check Out Time (discharged/leaves Emergency Department or admitted to hospital).

    Time frame: On day of Emergency Department admission

07

Results

Posted Dec 28, 2016
Limitations and caveats
23 subjects in the control group and 2 in the study group were not included due to their interrogation not being done in the emergency department.

Participant flow

Subjects enrolled from 20-September-2013 to 14-April-2015 from the Genesis Healthcare Emergency Department located in Zanesville, Ohio.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With Programmer
Started3548
Completed3325
Not completed223
Withdrew: Interrogation not done in emergency room122
Withdrew: Interrogation not completed correctly10
Withdrew: Subject non-compliance01

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Interrogation

Time to interrogation is defined as the time from Triage (decision to interrogate the device) until the first of: Completion of interrogation, Time of Clinical/Treatment decision, or Emergency Department check out time.

Time frame:
On day of Emergency Department admission
Reported as:
Median · Minutes
Time to Interrogation
MinutesInterrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With Programmer
Time to Interrogation25 (1 to 95)210 (1 to 980)
SecondaryTime to Clinical/Treatment Decision

Defined as the time from the Emergency Department Check In Time until the first of: Time of Clinical/Treatment Decision or Emergency Department Check Out Time (discharged/leaves Emergency Department or admitted to hospital).

Time frame:
On day of Emergency Department admission
Reported as:
Median · Minutes
Time to Clinical/Treatment Decision
MinutesInterrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With Programmer
Time to Clinical/Treatment Decision204 (67 to 354)270 (24 to 874)
Other pre-specifiedLength of Emergency Department Stay

Defined as the time from the Emergency Department Check In Time until the Emergency Department Check Out Time (discharged/leaves Emergency Department or admitted to hospital).

Time frame:
On day of Emergency Department admission
Reported as:
Median · Minutes
Length of Emergency Department Stay
MinutesInterrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With Programmer
Length of Emergency Department Stay261 (109 to 547)245 (66 to 874)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were reported while subject was in the Emergency Department.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Interrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring Transmitter—0/35 (0%)1/35 (2.9%)
Interrogation With Programmer—0/48 (0%)0/48 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInterrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With Programmer
Failed transmission from the study device to fax, email, or Merlin.NetInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/350/48

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Interrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With ProgrammerTotal
Mean67.1 ± 18.664.4 ± 14.765.5 ± 16.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Interrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With ProgrammerTotal
Female17724
Male184159
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Interrogation With Unpaired Remote Monitoring TransmitterInterrogation With ProgrammerTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native156
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American123
White334174
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Genesis Healthcare System
    Zanesville, Ohio 43701, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01871090
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 6, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Results posted
Dec 28, 2016
Last update
Feb 15, 2019

Study contacts

Marc Girsky, MD
principal investigator · Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor - UCLA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion