An interventional study of HeartLight(TM) Laser Balloon and irrigated radiofrequency current ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Boris Schmidt. Completed at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-21.
Sponsored by Boris Schmidt · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Aim of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the endoscopic ablation system in comparison to irrigated radiofrequency current ablation in patients with drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation.
3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 152 is close to the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →This is the only study on the registry with Boris Schmidt as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the HeartLight(TM) Laser Balloon (endoscopically guided ablation)
Device: HeartLight(TM) Laser Balloon
Safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the irrigated radiofrequency current ablation
Device: irrigated radiofrequency current ablation
With the HeartLight(TM) Laser Balloon pulmonary vein isolation is done endoscopically guided
The irrigated radiofrequency current ablation is used for pulmonary vein isolation
Documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation or any atrial tachyarrhythmia >30 seconds
Time frame: between day 90 and 365 days after index procedure
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.