CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01863368Updated Aug 4, 2015Results posted

Clinical Evaluation of Systane® ULTRA Compared to OPTIVE® in Ocular Surface Staining

An interventional study of Preservative-free saline solution eyedrops and Systane® ULTRA lubricant eyedrops in Dry Eye Syndrome, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-04.

Sponsored by Alcon Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare Systane® ULTRA lubricant eye drops to OPTIVE® lubricating eye drops for ocular surface staining within dry eye subjects and to evaluate the safety of Systane® ULTRA after 3 months of use.

Read the detailed description

Following a 2-week washout phase with saline eye drops, subjects were randomized to receive either Systane® ULTRA or OPTIVE® for the remainder of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Syndrome

Keywords

  • Dry eye syndrome
  • Systane Ultra
  • Optive
  • Ocular Surface Staining
  • OSDI
  • Eye drops
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 109 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 99 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to attend all study visits.
  • Diagnosis of dry eye, as specified in protocol.
  • Uses artificial tears, as specified in protocol.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor visual acuity, as specified in protocol.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating, or not using adequate birth control, as specified in protocol.
  • Any hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational products or ingredients.
  • Any eye disorder, ocular surgery, medication, medical condition, or systemic disease, as specified in protocol.
  • Contact lens use within 2 weeks of Screening Visit.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Systane Ultra

    Systane® ULTRA lubricant eyedrops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 35 days (Phase I), followed by 55 days additional use as needed (Phase II).

    Other: Preservative-free saline solution eyedrops · Other: Systane® ULTRA lubricant eyedrops

  • Active comparator
    Optive

    OPTIVE® lubricating eyedrops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 35 days (Phase I), followed by 55 days additional use as needed (Phase II).

    Other: Preservative-free saline solution eyedrops · Other: OPTIVE® lubricating eyedrops

Interventions

  • OtherPreservative-free saline solution eyedrops

    1 drop in each eye, 4 times a day, for up to two weeks as washout prior to Phase I and Phase II.

  • OtherSystane® ULTRA lubricant eyedrops
  • OtherOPTIVE® lubricating eyedrops
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

    The TOSS score is a composite score of corneal fluorescein staining, nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining, and temporal conjunctival lissamine green staining, each scored on a 0-5 Likert scale (0=absent, 5=severe). TOSS scores can range from 0 to 15. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 35

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

    The OSDI is a 12-item, quality of life questionnaire that evaluates symptoms based on 3 modules (type of discomfort, environmental triggers, and tasking) on a 0-4 Likert scale (0=None of the time, 4=All of the time). A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, where 0=No disability and 100=Complete disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

    Time frame: Day 35

  2. Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

    The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment effectiveness scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time, 1=A little of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=Most of the time, and 4=All of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment effectiveness was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

    Time frame: Day 35

  3. Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

    The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment inconvenience scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time, 1=Most of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=A little of the time, and 4=None of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment inconvenience was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

    Time frame: Day 35

07

Results

Posted Jul 10, 2015

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from 13 study centers located in France and 3 study centers located in Germany.

Phase I, Day 0 to Day 35
Participant flow — Phase I, Day 0 to Day 35
MilestoneSystane UltraOptive
Started4648
Treated4647
Completed4341
Not completed37
Withdrew: Adverse event24
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject prior to treatment01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02
Phase II, Day 35 to Day 90
Participant flow — Phase II, Day 35 to Day 90
MilestoneSystane UltraOptive
Started4341
Completed4141
Not completed20
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The TOSS score is a composite score of corneal fluorescein staining, nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining, and temporal conjunctival lissamine green staining, each scored on a 0-5 Likert scale (0=absent, 5=severe). TOSS scores can range from 0 to 15. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 35
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
units on a scaleSystane UltraOptive
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)-2.2 ± 2.3-1.7 ± 2.4
SecondaryMean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The OSDI is a 12-item, quality of life questionnaire that evaluates symptoms based on 3 modules (type of discomfort, environmental triggers, and tasking) on a 0-4 Likert scale (0=None of the time, 4=All of the time). A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, where 0=No disability and 100=Complete disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Time frame:
Day 35
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
units on a scaleSystane UltraOptive
Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)31.0 ± 18.335.4 ± 17.1
SecondaryMean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment effectiveness scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time, 1=A little of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=Most of the time, and 4=All of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment effectiveness was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Time frame:
Day 35
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
units on a scaleSystane UltraOptive
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)62.2 ± 27.355.7 ± 29.4
SecondaryMean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment inconvenience scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time, 1=Most of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=A little of the time, and 4=None of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment inconvenience was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Time frame:
Day 35
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
units on a scaleSystane UltraOptive
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)69.5 ± 15.867.1 ± 23.6

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study (Sep 2013 - Jun 2014). AEs are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. One subject was randomized to Optive, but was never exposed to product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pre-treatment—1/105 (1%)1/105 (1%)
Systane Ultra—1/46 (2.2%)2/46 (4.3%)
Optive—0/47 (0%)3/47 (6.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPre-treatmentSystane UltraOptive
Spinal column injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1051/460/47
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders1/1050/460/47
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPre-treatmentSystane UltraOptive
Eye irritationEye disorders1/1052/463/47

Baseline characteristics

This analysis group includes all randomized subjects.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Systane UltraOptiveTotal
Mean63.5 ± 13.165.2 ± 14.364.4 ± 13.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Systane UltraOptiveTotal
Female394079
Male7815
Mean Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score
Mean Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score(units on a scale)Systane UltraOptiveTotal
Mean5.5 ± 1.95.5 ± 1.75.5 ± 1.8
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Labetoulle M, Messmer EM, Pisella PJ, Ogundele A, Baudouin C. Safety and efficacy of a hydroxypropyl guar/polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol-based lubricant eye-drop in patients with dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;101(4):487-492. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308608. Epub 2016 Jul 15. PubMed 27422973 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01863368
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 27, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2014
Completion
Jun 2014
Results posted
Jul 10, 2015
Last update
Aug 4, 2015

Study contacts

Steve Burmaster
study director · Alcon Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion