ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01860534Updated Jan 14, 2016Results posted

"Eye Protection After Mydriatic Use for ROP Screening: Impact on Vitals Signs and Pain Scores"

An interventional study of eye covers in Light Sensitivity, sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-14.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pupillary dilation induced by mydriatic agents during Retinopathy of Prematurity exams can persist for hours. Despite regular use of eye protection for mydriatic-induced light sensitivity for infants, children and adults, eye protection after mydriasis has not been addressed in neonates. This study examines the use of eye patches to protect the dilated pupil from light exposure and their impact on vital signs and pain scores. prevents tachycardia, tachypnea and discomfort in neonates after ROP screening.

Read the detailed description

Pain management for Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening focuses on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions during the actual eye examination. Management of pain related to increased light sensitivity during the post-mydriasis period has not been described.

This prospective, randomized study evaluated the impact of protecting the eyes from ambient light exposure post mydriasis. Vital signs and pain scales were recorded in infants randomized to either wear or not wear eye patches after mydriasis for their ROP exam. Infants less than 30 weeks gestational age or less than 1500 grams at birth were included. Standard statistical methods were used to compare vital signs and pain scores for each group at baseline, 1 and 3 hours after mydriasis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Light Sensitivity

Keywords

  • pain
  • mydriasis
  • light
03

In context

Photophobia

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Photophobia; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 43 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Photophobia.

Browse Photophobia studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston is the lead sponsor of 257 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All infants with gestational age at birth of 30 weeks or less or with birth weight less than 1500g undergoing their first ROP exam in the Infant Special Care Unit (ISCU) at UTMB.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants were excluded if they had any congenital malformation or syndrome; a history of eye surgery or were receiving inotropics medications.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eye patches covers

    The infants were randomly assigned by alternating enrolled patients between one of two groups prior to their first ROP screening. Group A was patched for their first ROP exam and then unpatched for their second exam while group B was unpatched for their first ROP exam and patched for their second exam. The patched subjects had eye covers after their eyes were dilated, and the unpatched subjects had comfort measures similar to the patched subjects but their eyes were not covered. The patching of the eyes was done in the same way that it is done for eye protection during phototherapy, with the same model of eye patches (Natus biliband) and with the same nursing care.

    Behavioral: eye covers

  • No intervention
    no eye patches covers

    The infants were randomly assigned by alternating enrolled patients between one of two groups prior to their first ROP screening. Group A was patched for their first ROP exam and then unpatched for their second exam while group B was unpatched for their first ROP exam and patched for their second exam. The patched subjects had eye covers after their eyes were dilated, and the unpatched subjects had comfort measures similar to the patched subjects but their eyes were not covered. The patching of the eyes was done in the same way that it is done for eye protection during phototherapy, with the same model of eye patches (Natus biliband) and with the same nursing care.

Interventions

  • Behavioraleye covers

    The infants were randomly assigned by alternating enrolled patients between one of two groups prior to their first ROP screening. Group A was patched for their first ROP exam and then unpatched for their second exam while group B was unpatched for their first ROP exam and unpatched for their second exam. The patched subjects had eye covers after their eyes were dilated, and the unpatched subjects had comfort measures similar to the patched subjects but their eyes were not covered. The patching of the eyes was done in the same way that it is done for eye protection during phototherapy, with the same model of eye patches (Natus biliband) and with the same nursing care.

    Also known as: eye patches (Natus biliband)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate

    At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Heart rate was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used

    Time frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops

Secondary outcomes

  1. Respiratory Rate

    At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Respiratory rate was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used

    Time frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops

  2. Oxygen Percent Saturation

    At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Oxygen percent saturation was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used

    Time frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops

  3. Pain

    At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Pain scores were recorded by direct observation using the Neonatal and Infant Pain Scale (NIPS). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used. NIPS scoring consists of 6 measures associated with neonatal or infant pain, each with a range of 0-7 with low scores (0-2) associated with no pain and scores \> to 4 associated with severe pain. Maximum scoring would be 42 for severe pain and minimal being 0 for no pain. The six measures on NIPS include: facial expression, crying, breathing patterns, arm movements, leg movements and state of arousal.

    Time frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2016

Participant flow

July 2011 to september 2012. At the University of Texas medical Branch.

ROP #1
Participant flow — ROP #1
MilestoneEye Patch Initially Then no Eye Patchno Eye Patches Initially Then Eye Patches
Started1414
Completed1413
Not completed01
Withdrew: Needed treatment for rop01
ROP #2
Participant flow — ROP #2
MilestoneEye Patch Initially Then no Eye Patchno Eye Patches Initially Then Eye Patches
Started1413
Completed1313
Not completed10
Withdrew: Discharged prior to rop #210

Outcome measures

PrimaryHeart Rate

At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Heart rate was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used

Time frame:
pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minutes
Heart Rate
Beats per minutesEye Patches Covers (ROP #1 and ROP #2)no Eye Patches Covers (ROP #1 and ROP #2)
Baseline154 ± 8154 ± 12
1 hour post dilation152 ± 8163 ± 10
3 hour post dilation154 ± 8164 ± 9
SecondaryRespiratory Rate

At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Respiratory rate was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used

Time frame:
pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops
Reported as:
Mean · Breaths per minutes
Respiratory Rate
Breaths per minutesEye Patches Coversno Eye Patches Covers
Baseline54 ± 1347 ± 8
1 hour post dilation54 ± 1352 ± 13
3 hour post dilation55 ± 1150 ± 10
SecondaryOxygen Percent Saturation

At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Oxygen percent saturation was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used

Time frame:
pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops
Reported as:
Mean · percent saturation
Oxygen Percent Saturation
percent saturationEye Patches Coversno Eye Patches Covers
Baseline98 ± 398 ± 3
1 hour post dilation98 ± 398 ± 3
3 hour post dilation98 ± 398 ± 2
SecondaryPain

At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Pain scores were recorded by direct observation using the Neonatal and Infant Pain Scale (NIPS). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used. NIPS scoring consists of 6 measures associated with neonatal or infant pain, each with a range of 0-7 with low scores (0-2) associated with no pain and scores \> to 4 associated with severe pain. Maximum scoring would be 42 for severe pain and minimal being 0 for no pain. The six measures on NIPS include: facial expression, crying, breathing patterns, arm movements, leg movements and state of arousal.

Time frame:
pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain
units on a scaleEye Patches Coversno Eye Patches Covers
Baseline0.4 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.5
1 hour post dilation0.1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.7
3 hour post dilation0.2 ± 0.21 ± 0.6

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Eye Patches Covers—0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)
no Eye Patches Covers—0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Eye Patches Initially Then no Patchesno Eye Patches Initially Then Eye PatchesTotal
<=18 years141428
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Eye Patches Initially Then no Patchesno Eye Patches Initially Then Eye PatchesTotal
Mean0.54 ± 0.040.53 ± 0.040.53 ± 0.04
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Eye Patches Initially Then no Patchesno Eye Patches Initially Then Eye PatchesTotal
Female6713
Male8715
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Eye Patches Initially Then no Patchesno Eye Patches Initially Then Eye PatchesTotal
United States141428
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01860534
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2013
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Sep 2012
Results posted
Jan 14, 2016
Last update
Jan 14, 2016

Study contacts

Erika M. Espino-Torres, MD
principal investigator · UTMB

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion