ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01859221Updated Sep 14, 2022

Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

An interventional study of Stereotactic radiation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-14.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this phase II study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with an investigational radiation regimen using stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer and to establish efficacy (producing a desired result or effect) and safety in this setting.

Read the detailed description

This study will serve as a component of a larger program investigating the benefits of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with metastatic disease.

This particular study will serve as a benchmark analysis.

All patients will receive stereotactic radiotherapy directed at metastatic tumors.

If primary prostate cancer is active and has not previously been treated with radiation therapy, conventional radiation therapy (6-8 weeks of daily treatment) may be recommended. The metastatic tumor will be treated at the same time.

Hormone therapy will be recommended for all patients.

Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at regular intervals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Oligometastatic prostate cancer
  • Proton radiation
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,484 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,415 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 58 across 4,908 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,285 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 177 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 141 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with metastatic cancer of the prostate,
  • Patients may have received prior surgery,
  • Prior radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), immunotherapy, bone metastasis directed therapy, or chemotherapy for prostate cancer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage heart disease,
  • End-stage liver disease,
  • End-stage renal disease,
  • End stage pulmonary disease
  • Current brain or central nervous system metastasis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Castration Resistant

    There are two different prognostic categories, hormones receptive and castration resistant, that have differing historical disease progression rates. We have therefore stratified the trial so that we can independently monitor the hypothesized improvement provided by radiation therapy in these two groups. Both groups will receive the same radiation modality which is interventional stereotactic radiation with two possible schedules of SBRT and SHRT.

    Radiation: Stereotactic radiation

  • Experimental
    Hormone Receptive

    There are two different prognostic categories, hormones receptive and castration resistant, that have differing historical disease progression rates. We have therefore stratified the trial so that we can independently monitor the hypothesized improvement provided by radiation therapy in these two groups. Both groups will receive the same radiation modality which is interventional stereotactic radiation with two possible schedules of SBRT and SHRT.

    Radiation: Stereotactic radiation

Interventions

  • RadiationStereotactic radiation

    Stereotactic radiation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in median progression-free survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer over historic control rates in hormone receptive and castration resistant subgroups.

    Over the 78 month period, any occurrence of toxicity and/or treatment failure will be monitored via regular patient follow-up interviews. The cumulative rate at 78 months is analytic outcome of interest for each type of secondary outcome.

    Time frame: 78 months after radiation treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

    Over the 78 month period, any occurrence of toxicity and/or treatment failure will be monitored via regular patient follow-up interviews. The cumulative rate at 78 months is analytic outcome of interest for each type of secondary outcome.

    Time frame: 78 months after radiation treatment

  2. Treatment failure rates in patients treated with stereotactic radiation for metastatic prostate cancer.

    Over the 78 month period, any occurrence of toxicity and/or treatment failure will be monitored via regular patient follow-up interviews. The cumulative rate at 78 months is analytic outcome of interest for each type of secondary outcome.

    Time frame: 78 months after radiation treatment

  3. Quality of life in patients treated with stereotactic radiation for metastatic prostate cancer.

    Over the 78 month period, any occurrence of toxicity and/or treatment failure will be monitored via regular patient follow-up interviews. The cumulative rate at 78 months is analytic outcome of interest for each type of secondary outcome.

    Time frame: 78 months after radiation treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute
    Jacksonville, Florida 32206, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brawley OW. Prostate cancer epidemiology in the United States. World J Urol. 2012 Apr;30(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0824-2. Epub 2012 Apr 5. PubMed 22476558 ↗
  • Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4. PubMed 22237781 ↗
  • Hsiao W, Moses KA, Goodman M, Jani AB, Rossi PJ, Master VA. Stage IV prostate cancer: survival differences in clinical T4, nodal and metastatic disease. J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):512-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 Jun 17. PubMed 20620410 ↗
  • Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Mohile S, Golijanin D, Wu G. Prostate cancer in the elderly: frequency of advanced disease at presentation and disease-specific mortality. Cancer. 2012 Jun 15;118(12):3062-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26392. Epub 2011 Oct 17. PubMed 22006014 ↗
  • James ND, Sydes MR, Mason MD, Clarke NW, Anderson J, Dearnaley DP, Dwyer J, Jovic G, Ritchie AW, Russell JM, Sanders K, Thalmann GN, Bertelli G, Birtle AJ, O'Sullivan JM, Protheroe A, Sheehan D, Srihari N, Parmar MK; STAMPEDE investigators. Celecoxib plus hormone therapy versus hormone therapy alone for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: first results from the STAMPEDE multiarm, multistage, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):549-58. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70088-8. Epub 2012 Mar 26. PubMed 22452894 ↗
  • Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A, Damber JE, Angelsen A, Fransson P, Lund JA, Tasdemir I, Hoyer M, Wiklund F, Fossa SD; Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study 7; Swedish Association for Urological Oncology 3. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jan 24;373(9660):301-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61815-2. Epub 2008 Dec 16. PubMed 19091394 ↗
  • Warde P, Mason M, Ding K, Kirkbride P, Brundage M, Cowan R, Gospodarowicz M, Sanders K, Kostashuk E, Swanson G, Barber J, Hiltz A, Parmar MK, Sathya J, Anderson J, Hayter C, Hetherington J, Sydes MR, Parulekar W; NCIC CTG PR.3/MRC UK PR07 investigators. Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2104-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61095-7. Epub 2011 Nov 2. PubMed 22056152 ↗
  • Autio KA, Scher HI, Morris MJ. Therapeutic strategies for bone metastases and their clinical sequelae in prostate cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(2):174-88. doi: 10.1007/s11864-012-0190-8. PubMed 22528368 ↗
  • Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, Berger ER, Small EJ, Penson DF, Redfern CH, Ferrari AC, Dreicer R, Sims RB, Xu Y, Frohlich MW, Schellhammer PF; IMPACT Study Investigators. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):411-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001294. PubMed 20818862 ↗
  • Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, Chin JL, Vinholes JJ, Goas JA, Chen B; Zoledronic Acid Prostate Cancer Study Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 2;94(19):1458-68. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.19.1458. PubMed 12359855 ↗
  • Kelly WK, Halabi S, Carducci M, George D, Mahoney JF, Stadler WM, Morris M, Kantoff P, Monk JP, Kaplan E, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial comparing docetaxel and prednisone with or without bevacizumab in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CALGB 90401. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1534-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4767. Epub 2012 Mar 26. PubMed 22454414 ↗
  • Smith MR, Saad F, Coleman R, Shore N, Fizazi K, Tombal B, Miller K, Sieber P, Karsh L, Damiao R, Tammela TL, Egerdie B, Van Poppel H, Chin J, Morote J, Gomez-Veiga F, Borkowski T, Ye Z, Kupic A, Dansey R, Goessl C. Denosumab and bone-metastasis-free survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):39-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61226-9. Epub 2011 Nov 15. PubMed 22093187 ↗
  • Logothetis CJ. Treatment of prostate cancer metastases: more than semantics. Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):4-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61540-7. Epub 2011 Nov 15. No abstract available. PubMed 22093188 ↗
  • de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, Hansen S, Machiels JP, Kocak I, Gravis G, Bodrogi I, Mackenzie MJ, Shen L, Roessner M, Gupta S, Sartor AO; TROPIC Investigators. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61389-X. PubMed 20888992 ↗
  • Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L, Milecki P, Shore N, Rader M, Wang H, Jiang Q, Tadros S, Dansey R, Goessl C. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):813-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. Epub 2011 Feb 25. PubMed 21353695 ↗
  • Mottet N, Van Damme J, Loulidi S, Russel C, Leitenberger A, Wolff JM; TAP22 Investigators Group. Intermittent hormonal therapy in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: a randomized trial. BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1262-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11120.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13. PubMed 22502816 ↗
  • de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, Fizazi K, North S, Chu L, Chi KN, Jones RJ, Goodman OB Jr, Saad F, Staffurth JN, Mainwaring P, Harland S, Flaig TW, Hutson TE, Cheng T, Patterson H, Hainsworth JD, Ryan CJ, Sternberg CN, Ellard SL, Flechon A, Saleh M, Scholz M, Efstathiou E, Zivi A, Bianchini D, Loriot Y, Chieffo N, Kheoh T, Haqq CM, Scher HI; COU-AA-301 Investigators. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 26;364(21):1995-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. PubMed 21612468 ↗
  • Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):8-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.8. No abstract available. PubMed 7799047 ↗
  • Singh D, Yi WS, Brasacchio RA, Muhs AG, Smudzin T, Williams JP, Messing E, Okunieff P. Is there a favorable subset of patients with prostate cancer who develop oligometastases? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)01442-1. PubMed 14697414 ↗
  • Rana A, Chisholm GD, Khan M, Sekharjit SS, Merrick MV, Elton RA. Patterns of bone metastasis and their prognostic significance in patients with carcinoma of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1993 Dec;72(6):933-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16301.x. PubMed 8306158 ↗
  • Noguchi M, Kikuchi H, Ishibashi M, Noda S. Percentage of the positive area of bone metastasis is an independent predictor of disease death in advanced prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003 Jan 27;88(2):195-201. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600715. PubMed 12610502 ↗
  • Dexiang Z, Li R, Ye W, Haifu W, Yunshi Z, Qinghai Y, Shenyong Z, Bo X, Li L, Xiangou P, Haohao L, Lechi Y, Tianshu L, Jia F, Xinyu Q, Jianmin X. Outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: analysis of 1,613 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;19(9):2860-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2356-9. Epub 2012 Apr 12. PubMed 22526903 ↗
  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed 19097774 ↗
  • Cox BW, Spratt DE, Lovelock M, Bilsky MH, Lis E, Ryu S, Sheehan J, Gerszten PC, Chang E, Gibbs I, Soltys S, Sahgal A, Deasy J, Flickinger J, Quader M, Mindea S, Yamada Y. International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium consensus guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 19. PubMed 22608954 ↗
  • Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hinson W, Kavanagh B, Keall P, Lovelock M, Meeks S, Papiez L, Purdie T, Sadagopan R, Schell MC, Salter B, Schlesinger DJ, Shiu AS, Solberg T, Song DY, Stieber V, Timmerman R, Tome WA, Verellen D, Wang L, Yin FF. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4078-101. doi: 10.1118/1.3438081. PubMed 20879569 ↗
  • Potters L, Steinberg M, Rose C, Timmerman R, Ryu S, Hevezi JM, Welsh J, Mehta M, Larson DA, Janjan NA; American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; American College of Radiology. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and American College of Radiology practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1026-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.701. No abstract available. PubMed 15519771 ↗
  • Potters L, Kavanagh B, Galvin JM, Hevezi JM, Janjan NA, Larson DA, Mehta MP, Ryu S, Steinberg M, Timmerman R, Welsh JS, Rosenthal SA; American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; American College of Radiology. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Feb 1;76(2):326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.042. No abstract available. PubMed 20117285 ↗
  • Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM, Martin SC, Curran SL, Fields KK, Greenberg H, Lyman G. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: development and validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):301-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1024929829627. PubMed 9610214 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2013, a primary completion of Sep 2022 and a completion of Sep 2022. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2013
First posted
May 21, 2013
Start
May 2013
Primary completionActual
Sep 13, 2022
CompletionActual
Sep 13, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01859221
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2013
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Sep 13, 2022
Completion
Sep 13, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022

Study contacts

Roi Dagan, MD, MS
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion