CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01852084Updated Sep 16, 2020Results posted

Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric IOL Designed to Reduce the Effects of Preoperative Corneal Astigmatism

An interventional study of enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric IOL and enVista control lens in Astigmatism, sponsored by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-16.

Sponsored by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
191
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigational enVista IOL, Model MX60Tis equipped with toric optics and axis marks on the posterior surface to minimize the possibility of surgically induced astigmatism.

Read the detailed description

The investigational enVista Toric IOL, Model MX60T, and the currently approved Model MX60, are identical with the exception of the addition of toric optics and axis marks on the posterior optic surface for the correction of astigmatism on the Model MX60T. Both lenses have an aspheric biconvex optic with a modified C haptic monoblock, single-piece design. The design and material of both the MX60 and MX60T allow them to be folded and inserted through small incisions to minimize the possibility of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Astigmatism

Browse trials for

03

In context

Astigmatism

413 studies on the registry are indexed under Astigmatism; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 191 is above the median of 55 across 321 interventional studies indexed under Astigmatism.

Browse Astigmatism studies →

Lead sponsor

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated is the lead sponsor of 219 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must have a clinically significant cataract in the study eye that is considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
  • Subjects must require a lens power from 16.0 D to 27.0 D in the study eye.
  • Subjects must be willing to discontinue contact lens wear for the duration of the study and, demonstrate stability prior to biometry and surgery in the study eye.
  • Subjects must have a best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) projected to be better than 20/30 after toric IOL implantation in the study eye.
  • Subjects must have predicted postoperative corneal astigmatism between 0.90D and 2.40D in the study eye, as determined by the Toric Calculator.
  • Subjects must have a minimum preoperative corneal astigmatism of 0.90 D in the study eye.
  • Subjects must have a dilated preoperative pupil size greater than or equal to 5.0 mm in the study eye.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have had previous intraocular or corneal surgery in the study eye.
  • Subjects with any clinically significant ocular pathology which would be expected to reduce potential BCDVA to 20/30 or worse in the study eye during the course of the study.
  • Subjects with any anterior segment pathology in the study eye likely to increase the risk of complications from phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
  • Subjects with associated ocular conditions which could affect the stability of the IOL in the study eye.
  • Subjects with a traumatic cataract in the study eye.
  • Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye.
  • Subjects with clinically significant irregular corneal astigmatism in the study eye, as determined by the medical judgment of the Investigator.
  • Subjects with clinically significant corneal pathology potentially affecting topography of either eye.
  • Subjects with any ocular condition that could prevent the possibility of a visual outcome better than 20/30 in the study eye.
  • Subjects with a difference of greater than 0.50D of corneal astigmatism as measured with the IOL Master and the topographer in the study eye using vector analysis.
  • Subjects with an anterior chamber depth \<2mm in the study eye.
  • Subjects with potential BCDVA of 20/200 or worse in the fellow eye.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
191 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric IOL

    Toric cylinder power of either 1.25 diopters (D), 2.00 D, or 2.75 D

    Device: enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric IOL

  • Experimental
    enVista control lens

    Spherical control lens

    Device: enVista control lens

Interventions

  • DeviceenVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric IOL

    Test lens having a toric cylinder power of either 1.25 diopters (D), 2.00 D, or 2.75 D

  • DeviceenVista control lens

    Spherical Control lens

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Dioptric Change in Cylinder

    Dioptric change in cylinder from the preoperative keratometric cylinder magnitude to postoperative manifest refraction cylinder magnitude (referenced to the corneal plane).

    Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Lens (IOL) Rotation of Less Than or Equal to Five Degrees

    Intraocular Lens (IOL) rotation of less than or equal to five degrees between Forms 3 (scheduled within window: days 30-60) and final visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180).

    Time frame: Form 3 Visit (window: days 30-60), Final Visit (window: days 120-180)

  3. Mean Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit

    Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit, expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity.

    Time frame: Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Cylinder Within 0.50 Diopter (D) and Within 1.00 D of Intended.

    Time frame: Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Final Visit

    Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Uncorrected means not spectacle-corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity.

    Time frame: Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)

07

Results

Posted Sep 16, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Started79802012
Completed79801812
Not completed0020

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Dioptric Change in Cylinder

Dioptric change in cylinder from the preoperative keratometric cylinder magnitude to postoperative manifest refraction cylinder magnitude (referenced to the corneal plane).

Time frame:
Baseline, Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)
Reported as:
Mean · diopter
Mean Dioptric Change in Cylinder
diopterControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Mean Dioptric Change in Cylinder-0.479 ± 0.665-0.865 ± 0.487-1.413 ± 0.532-1.944 ± 0.327
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Intraocular Lens (IOL) Rotation of Less Than or Equal to Five Degrees

Intraocular Lens (IOL) rotation of less than or equal to five degrees between Forms 3 (scheduled within window: days 30-60) and final visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180).

Time frame:
Form 3 Visit (window: days 30-60), Final Visit (window: days 120-180)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Lens (IOL) Rotation of Less Than or Equal to Five Degrees
ParticipantsControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Lens (IOL) Rotation of Less Than or Equal to Five Degrees—741512
PrimaryMean Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit

Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit, expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity.

Time frame:
Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Mean Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit
logMARControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Mean Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit0.01 ± 0.090.00 ± 0.090.05 ± 0.10-0.01 ± 0.09
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Reduction in Cylinder Within 0.50 Diopter (D) and Within 1.00 D of Intended.
Time frame:
Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Cylinder Within 0.50 Diopter (D) and Within 1.00 D of Intended.
ParticipantsControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Within 0.50 D of intended2743128
Within 1.00 D of intended45711712
SecondaryMean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Final Visit

Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Uncorrected means not spectacle-corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity.

Time frame:
Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180)
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Final Visit
logMARControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Final Visit0.19 ± 0.160.11 ± 0.140.12 ± 0.110.13 ± 0.18

Adverse events

Collected over 180 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control IOL0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)38/79 (48.1%)
Toric IOL1.25 D0/80 (0%)2/80 (2.5%)39/80 (48.8%)
Toric IOL 2.00 D0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)7/20 (35%)
Toric IOL 2.75 D0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Epiretinal membraneEye disorders0/790/801/200/12
IOL tiltEye disorders0/791/800/200/12
Anterior lens vaultEye disorders0/791/800/200/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventControl IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 D
Corneal edemaEye disorders15/7918/803/200/12
Anterior chamber cellEye disorders17/7915/801/201/12
Dry eyeEye disorders1/791/802/200/12
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders7/792/801/201/12
Anterior chamber flareEye disorders4/793/801/201/12
Punctate keratosisEye disorders6/795/800/200/12
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations3/795/801/200/12
DiplopiaEye disorders0/791/801/200/12
TrichiasisEye disorders0/791/801/200/12
MaculopathyEye disorders0/790/801/200/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 DTotal
Mean69.5 ± 8.671.1 ± 8.868.7 ± 9.169.6 ± 8.870.1 ± 8.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control IOLToric IOL1.25 DToric IOL 2.00 DToric IOL 2.75 DTotal
Female364989102
Male433112389
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Bausch & Lomb
    Irvine, California 92618, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01852084
Lead sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 13, 2013
Start date
Mar 6, 2013
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Sep 16, 2020
Last update
Sep 16, 2020

Study contacts

Mark Packer, MD
study director · Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion