CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT01851018HyBraFiUpdated Mar 21, 2024

Toxicity Comparison Between Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With HDR Brachytherapy Boost Versus Standard Treatment

An interventional study of Hypofraction and Standard in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-21.

Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 95 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare toxicities between 2 external beam radiation fractionation schemes plus a brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer. Our current standard use a 2 Gy per fraction schedule which is compare to the experimental hypofractionated 3 Gy per day approach with neo adjuvant hormonal therapy. It will demonstrate the feasibility and safety of such a treatment regimen in prostate cancer. It may also set base for a larger randomized trial.

Read the detailed description

30 patients with intermediate / extensive low risk (all core biopsies involvements > 50%) prostate cancer (not necessitating to treat the nodal regions) will be included in this study. Patient stage T1 - T2, Gleason score ≤ 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 20 will be considered.

Fiducial gold markers will be introduced in the prostate 1-week before the CT planning. 36 gray (Gy) in 12 fractions using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) will be administered to the prostate (margins of 0,5cm) +/- first centimeter of the seminal vesicles.

Brachytherapy boost (15 Gy x 1) dosimetric parameters should respect our current standard (Prostate V100 > 90% and V150 ≤ 40%, V200 ≤ 15%, Urethra V125 ≤ 1 cc, Rectum V75 ≤ 1cc, Bladder V75 ≤ 1cc). Short course (4 months) hormonal therapy (Degarelix) will be administered to the patient based upon recommended litterature11, 12.

Genitourinary (GU), GI and Sexual toxicity will be self reported. QOL questionnaires will be given to the patients to be answered. Results will be monitored and compared to our currently used standard fractionation regiment.

Follow-up will be scheduled 6 weeks after the implant and every 4 months for the first year, every 6 months for the second year 2 to 5, and on a yearly basis after 5 years. PSA \& testosterone tests will be done every 3 months for the first 3 years, every 6 months on years 4 and 5, and yearly thereafter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • brachytherapy
  • hypofractionated radiation therapy
  • hormonal therapy
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval is the lead sponsor of 134 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 95 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 30 patients
  • intermediate / extensive low risk (all core biopsies involvements > 50%)
  • prostate cancer (not necessitating to treat the nodal regions)
  • Patient stage T1 - T2,
  • Gleason score ≤ 7,
  • PSA ≤ 20 will be considered

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient unfit for biopsy or brachytherapy
  • high or low risk prostate cancer
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hypofraction

    Patient reported toxicities related to Hypofraction radiation treatment (3 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week) up to a total of 36 Gy to the prostate (+/- seminal vesicles) plus brachytherapy boost (15 Gy in a single fraction) with 4 months neo-adjuvant firmagon (240 mg given as two subcutaneous injections of 120 mg at a concentration of 40 mg/mL as a starting dose with a maintenance dose of 80 mg given as one subcutaneous injection at a concentration of 20 mg/mL administered every 28 days).

    Radiation: Hypofraction

  • Active comparator
    Standard

    Patient reported toxicities related to the Standard radiation treatment (2 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week) up to a total of 44 Gy to the prostate (+/- seminal vesicles) plus brachytherapy boost (15 Gy in a single fraction) with 4 months neo-adjuvant LHRH agonists.

    Radiation: Standard

Interventions

  • RadiationHypofraction

    Patient reported toxicities related to Hypofraction radiation treatment (3 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week) up to a total of 36 Gy to the prostate (+/- seminal vesicles) plus brachytherapy boost (15 Gy in a single fraction) with 4 months neo-adjuvant firmagon (240 mg given as two subcutaneous injections of 120 mg at a concentration of 40 mg/mL as a starting dose with a maintenance dose of 80 mg given as one subcutaneous injection at a concentration of 20 mg/mL administered every 28 days).

  • RadiationStandard

    Patient reported toxicities related to the Standard radiation treatment (2 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week) up to a total of 44 Gy to the prostate (+/- seminal vesicles) plus brachytherapy boost (15 Gy in a single fraction) with 4 months neo-adjuvant LHRH agonists

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate and compare toxicity changes through follow-up between our study population and a reference group in regards to Median international prostate symptoms scores (IPSS).

    Comparison of the patient reported IPSS scores through the follow-up between each treatment group.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks post-implant, and at 4,8,12 months

  2. Evaluate and compare toxicity changes through follow-up between our study population and a reference group in regards to gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity score.

    Comparison of the patient reported Gastro-intestinal toxicity scores through the follow-up between each treatment group.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks post-implant, and at 4,8,12 months

  3. Evaluate and compare toxicity changes through follow-up between our study population and a reference group in regards to Sexual toxicity (EPIC or SHIM) score.

    Comparison of the patient reported Sexual toxicity (EPIC or SHIM) scores through the follow-up between each treatment group.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks post-implant, and at 4,8,12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate and compare biochemical disease free survival being non inferior to comparative cohort

    biochemical disease free survival (Phoenix definition)

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHUdeQuebec
    Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Bari B, Daidone A, Alongi F. Is high dose rate brachytherapy reliable and effective treatment for prostate cancer patients? A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Jun;94(3):360-70. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 17. PubMed 25819287 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01851018
Lead sponsor
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Collaborators
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
André-Guy Martin (André-Guy Martin MD MSC FRCP(C) Radio-oncologue, Curiethérapeute Professeur Associé, Université Laval, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec du CHUQ, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 10, 2013
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 21, 2024

Study contacts

Andre-Guy Martin, MD MSc
principal investigator · CHUQ L'Hotel Dieu de Quebec

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion