ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01848249DDSUpdated Apr 9, 2020

Deceased Donor Biomarkers and Recipient Outcomes

An observational study in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant, Acute Kidney Injury and Delayed Graft Function, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 17 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-09.

Sponsored by Yale University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,679
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Compared to chronic dialysis, kidney transplantation provides recipients with longer survival and better quality of life at a lower cost. In order to meet increasing demands for kidney allografts, kidneys from older and sicker donors are being procured. This has led to greater discard rates of donated kidneys as well as more complications for recipients, including shorter allograft survival. Available clinical models to predict kidney allograft quality have poor prognostic ability and do not asses the degree of kidney allograft injury. However, allograft injury near the time of procurement can lead to major consequences for the transplant recipient: greater risks of delayed graft function, poor allograft function and premature loss of the transplant. Our proposal is based on the hypotheses that novel biomarkers measured in donor urine and transport media at the time of procurement can assess acute and chronic kidney injury and that distinct biomarker patterns will predict allograft survival. In collaboration with five organ procurement organizations, we will collect urine samples from consecutive deceased donors and samples of transport solution for every pumped kidney. We will measure markers of injury, repair, inflammation and fibrosis. We will determine mortality and allograft survival in all patients by linkage to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (Overall Cohort). Additionally, we will perform a detailed chart review of a subset of recipients (detailed cohort) and will also examine associations between biomarkers and longitudinal graft function over five years after transplant. Early, non-invasive and rapid assessment of donor kidney injury could drive better allocation decisions and potentially reduce the rates of post-transplant complications. Further, these new tools could provide a platform for clinical trials of therapies for allografts and kidney transplant recipients aimed at ameliorating allograft injury.

Read the detailed description

Our study has several key processes that we have developed and tested to address our scientific aims:

  1. Enrollment

    We will collect urine samples from approximately 1600 deceased donors and approximately 600 perfusate samples from machine-pumped kidneys from participating organ procurement organizations (OPOs). We estimate that our final donor group will be comprised of 55% standard criteria donors, 25% expanded-criteria donors and 10% donors after cardiac death. Approximately, 20% of the kidneys will be discarded.

  2. Donor Data

    Donor variables come from two sources: the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database and detailed data abstraction from each OPO. The UNOS database provides data on all donors with demographics and other important clinical characteristics. The additional data collected by the OPO staff captures granular information on events surrounding donor death, which are not included in the UNOS database. These data will be available on all enrolled donors and include variables such as serial serum creatinine, nadir blood pressures, medication and vasopressor use, and machine pump parameters.

  3. Overall Recipient Cohort

    Over 2000 recipients will have received kidneys from the deceased donors in our study. The Overall Cohort will comprise all of these recipients General demographic and clinical characteristics about recipients in the Overall Cohort will come from the UNOS database. For the Overall Recipient Cohort, we will ascertain delayed graft function (DGF) through center reports to UNOS. We will ascertain allograft failure through center reports to UNOS and new episodes of wait-listing and re-transplant collected by UNOS, Recipient mortality will be ascertained through the center reports to UNOS/SRTR and through the Social Security Death Master File.

  4. Detailed Recipient Cohort

    A subset of over 1100 recipients of the Overall Cohort who had transplantation at any of our collaborating transplant centers will comprise this cohort. For the Detailed Subcohort, on-site coordinators will perform manual chart review and abstract more extensive data about each recipient including dialysis indications post-transplant, comorbidities, and specific doses of immunosuppression. For the Detailed Subcohort, we will also collect data on clinical events for up to five years after transplantation, including acute rejection and estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of transplantation and at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months after transplant.

  5. Novel biomarkers will be measured in urine and perfusate
02

Conditions studied

  • Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Delayed Graft Function
  • End Stage Renal Disease
  • Graft Failure

Keywords

  • deceased donors
  • kidney donor
  • transplant recipients
  • kidney transplant
  • delayed graft function
  • biomarkers
  • end stage renal disease
  • graft failure
03

In context

Acute Kidney Injury

1,691 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Kidney Injury; 395 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,679 is above the median of 160 across 814 observational studies indexed under Acute Kidney Injury.

Browse Acute Kidney Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,770 studies on the registry; 294 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 129 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The population from which our Deceased-Donor Cohort will be selected is all potential deceased organ donors located in the regions serviced by our participating organ procurement organizations (OPOs).

The recipient cohorts will be defined by the deceased donors enrolled in the study, and thus, the study population for this group is all recipients of kidneys from deceased organ donors procured in the regions serviced by our participating OPOs.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Donor Cohort: Appropriate for research according to OPO policies
  • Recipient Cohorts: Any recipient of at least one kidney from a deceased donor enrolled by our participating OPOs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Donor Cohort: Lack of adequate biospecimen quantity or quality as per protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,679 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Deceased-Donor Cohort

    We will collect urine samples from approximately 1600 deceased donors and approximately 600 perfusate samples from machine-pumped kidneys from participating organ procurement organizations (OPOs).

  • Recipient Cohort (Overall and Detailed)

    No samples will be collected from the recipients. Only clinical data and outcomes will be collected from the recipients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Delayed Graft Function

    Receipt of dialysis within the first seven days post renal transplant

    Time frame: Assessed within first week of receiving renal transplant

  2. Death-Censored Graft Failure (Overall Cohort)

    Requirement of chronic dialysis or retransplantation after renal transplant.

    Time frame: median of 4 years of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Graft Function (detailed cohort)

    Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate at specified time points over a five year period.

    Time frame: median of 4 years of follow-up

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • New England Organ Bank
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
  • Gift of Life Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, United States
  • Harper University Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • St. Barnabas Medical Center
    Livingston, New Jersey 07039, United States
  • New Jersey Sharing Network
    New Providence, New Jersey 07974, United States
  • Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
    Newark, New Jersey 07112, United States
  • New York Organ Donor Network
    New York, New York 10001, United States
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • NewYork-Presbyterian/ Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • The New York Hospital (Cornell)
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    New York, New York 10467, United States
  • Hahnemann University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, United States
  • Gift of Life Donor Program- Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hall IE, Bhangoo RS, Reese PP, Doshi MD, Weng FL, Hong K, Lin H, Han G, Hasz RD, Goldstein MJ, Schroppel B, Parikh CR. Glutathione S-transferase iso-enzymes in perfusate from pumped kidneys are associated with delayed graft function. Am J Transplant. 2014 Apr;14(4):886-96. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12635. Epub 2014 Feb 24. PubMed 24612768 ↗
  • Hall IE, Reese PP, Weng FL, Schroppel B, Doshi MD, Hasz RD, Reitsma W, Goldstein MJ, Hong K, Parikh CR. Preimplant histologic acute tubular necrosis and allograft outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Mar;9(3):573-82. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08270813. Epub 2014 Feb 20. PubMed 24558049 ↗
  • Liu C, Hall IE, Mansour S, Thiessen Philbrook HR, Jia Y, Parikh CR. Association of Deceased Donor Acute Kidney Injury With Recipient Graft Survival. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18634. PubMed 31913491 ↗
  • Puthumana J, Hall IE, Reese PP, Schroppel B, Weng FL, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Doshi MD, Rao V, Lee CG, Elias JA, Cantley LG, Parikh CR. YKL-40 Associates with Renal Recovery in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Feb;28(2):661-670. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010091. Epub 2016 Jul 22. PubMed 27451287 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2010, a primary completion of Dec 2019 and a completion of Mar 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 30, 2013
First posted
May 7, 2013
Start
May 1, 2010
Primary completionActual
Dec 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 2020
Last update
Apr 9, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01848249
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 7, 2013
Start date
May 1, 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2019
Completion
Mar 2020
Last update
Apr 9, 2020

Study contacts

Chirag R Parikh, MD PhD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion