ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01846533Updated Jul 30, 2015

Osteoprosis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients- a Cohort Study

An observational study in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Osteoporosis, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-30.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2015), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
1,200
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Some possible humoural and cellular mechanism for diabetes related osteoporosis/fractures were proposed and summarzied as the following, (1)Diabetes mellitus increases osteoclast function but decreases osteoblast function, thereby leading to accelerated bone loss, osteopenia and osteoporosis. (2)DM/hyperglycemia induces production of macrophage colony stimulating factor (MCSF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), all of which are osteoblast-derived activators of osteoclast proliferation and differentiation. (3) DM/hyperglycemia suppresses osteoblast proliferation and function, in part, by decreasing runtrelated transcription factor (Runx)-2, osteocalcin and osteopontin expressions. (4)Adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is increased as indicated by the overexpression of adipocyte differentiation markers, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-g, adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (aP2), adipsin and resistin. A decrease in neovascularization may further aggravate bone loss. (5)Bone quality is also reduced as a result of advanced glycation end products (AGE) production, which may eventually result in low impact or fragility fractures. DM are associated osteoporosis/fracture. The underlying mechanism, especially of type 2 DM, mandates a DM-osteoporosis cohort to elucidate. In clinical practice, to developed preventive strategies from osteoporotic-fracture is also necessary.

Read the detailed description

It is becoming apparent that both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis-associated fractures. A meta-analysis by Vestergaard showed that patients with type 1 DM have decreased bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. This study noted a 6.9 relative risk of hip fracture, when the expected relative risk of fracture was only 1.4 based on the BMD. This finding suggests that the increased fracture risk is not entirely accounted for by the lower BMD. It has been demonstrated that the presence of diabetic microvascular complications, including ophthalmic, nephropathic, and neurological, lead to a higher risk of hip fracture in patients with type 1 DM. Unlike patients with type 1 DM, patients with type 2 DM have an average or higher BMD than age-matched controls. However, several studies have demonstrated that patients with type 2 DM have a higher risk of hip, proximal humerus, and foot fractures. Data from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study indicate that post-menopausal women with diabetes are at an increased risk of hip, foot, and spine fractures, and fractures overall. For a given BMD, diabetic bone appears to be less strong and therefore more likely to fracture. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, insulin, bone morphogenetic proteins and osteoprotegerin (OPG), serve as anabolic signals to promote bone formation. Among these anabolic mediators, liver-derived IGF-1 is of particular interest since profound growth retardation, small bone size, low BMD and osteoporosis were reported in IGF-1 and IGF-1 receptor deficiencies. Furthermore, insulin was found to directly induce osteogenic action by increasing cell proliferation, differentiation, alkaline phosphatase activity and expression of type Ⅰcollagen and osteocalcin in human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. Type 1 DM featuring low circulating insulin and IGF-1 levels usually occurs in young children prior to peak bone mass attainment, whereas type 2 DM is common in adults who have already attained peak bone mass.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Osteoporosis
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,589 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,332 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,200 is above the median of 300 across 1,622 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,608 studies on the registry; 573 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

type 2 diabetic patients

Eligibility criteria

  1. inclusion:40-99 years old with type 2 DM patient
  2. exclusion:organization people
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
1,200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Osteoprosis in type 2 diabetic patients- a cohort study

    Time frame: three years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 100, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2013, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Dec 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 1, 2013
First posted
May 3, 2013
Start
May 2013
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2015
CompletionEst.
Dec 2015
Last update
Jul 30, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01846533
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2013
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2015 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2015

Study contacts

Kuo Chin Huang, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion