ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01813188Updated Mar 30, 2017

Clinical Trial Based on the Use of Mononuclear Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow in Patients With Pseudoarthrosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of ABM seeded onto a porous TCP and DBM and autologous bone graft in Pseudoarthrosis, sponsored by Fundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias de la Region de Murcia. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-30.

Sponsored by Fundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias de la Region de Murcia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to check the non-inferiority and lower morbidity of the use of bone marrow mononuclear cells seeded onto a porous matrix of calcium phosphate, for the consolidation of tibial bone defects (pseudoarthrosis), compared with autologous bone graft.

Read the detailed description

An estimated 10% of closed fractures and between 35-45% in cases of open fractures, are at risk of developing a delay in the process of consolidation or a complete failure of it (pseudoarthrosis) depending on location , severity of trauma on bone, soft tissue and vascular structures Some of these cases are refractory to all treatment methods available today, requiring numerous interventions with the potential risk for recurrent infections that they carry. For this reason, its treatment remains a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon.

Recent advances in knowledge of cellular and molecular biology related to the mechanism of bone repair and biomaterials science have been joined in a new discipline called tissue engineering, its implementation in clinical practice is being done so progressive.

Cell therapy based on the use of adult stem cells (MSCs) derived from autologous bone marrow, introduces new applications for the repair of fractures including pseudoarthrosis and avascular bone necrosis.

Its mechanism of action does not focus only on their local action, but also in the release of signaling molecules with autocrine and paracrine action through recruitment and activation of endogenous MSCs to osteoblastic differentiation and bone tissue regeneration.

On the other hand, the seeding of MSCs on biomaterials (natural or synthetic) is more effective, to facilitate adherence, proliferation and extracellular matrix production in the area where implanted.

Today, the investigators can say that there are experimental and clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of the method.

The investigators have designed a phase II clinical trial to check the feasibility of this approach.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pseudoarthrosis

Keywords

  • Fractures
  • Bone
  • Stem Cells
03

In context

Pseudarthrosis

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudarthrosis; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 22 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Pseudarthrosis.

Browse Pseudarthrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias de la Region de Murcia is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pseudarthrosis of tibia established any cause with at least 9 months.
  • The pseudarthrosis is not to show signs of healing in the last 3 months.
  • The pseudarthrosis subsidiary should not be solely osteosynthesis treatment.
  • Age between 18 and 75 years.
  • Serology (HIV), virus (HBV) and virus (HCV) negative.
  • Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age.
  • Patient sufficient guarantees of adherence to protocol.
  • Signature written before a witness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic infection.
  • Septic pseudoarthrosis.
  • Insufficient skin coverage at the site of nonunion.
  • Vascular insufficiency in the affected limb.
  • Pathological fracture.
  • Concomitant psychiatric or neurological disease.
  • Concurrent or prior treated with chemotherapy over a period of less than 1 year.
  • Concomitant severe disease not well controlled.
  • Inclusion in other clinical trials.
  • Inability to understand the informed consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ABM seeded onto a porous TCP and DBM

    ABM seeded onto a porous TCP and DBM

    Procedure: ABM seeded onto a porous TCP and DBM

  • Active comparator
    autologous bone graft

    autologous bone graft

    Procedure: autologous bone graft

Interventions

  • ProcedureABM seeded onto a porous TCP and DBM

    cells collection under sedation . 114 mL are obtained and processed through a ficoll gradient. Autologous bone marrow (ABM) cells seeded onto a porous tricalcium phosphate ceramic (TCP) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM)

  • Procedureautologous bone graft

    autologous bone graft

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time needed to repair the focus of necrosis measured by pain radiography

    Time frame: Baseline and every 14 days up to 180 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain scale

    Time frame: Baseline and every 14 days up to 180 days

  2. Technical success

    Understood as having been able to perform the implant of calcium phosphate matrix loaded with more than 100 million mononuclear cells

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Morbidity

    Infection of extraction points Pathological fracture of the extraction area Muscle hernia Stress fracture Infection of focus repaired Rupture of the focus fixture repaired Appearance of secondary malignancies

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Absence of adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. physical exploratory

    Time frame: Baseline and every 14 days up to 180 days

  6. Analgesia Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and every 14 days up to 180 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital UniversitarioVirgen de la Arrixaca
    El Palmar, Murcia 30120, Spain
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2011, a primary completion of Dec 2013 and a completion of Jun 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 22, 2011
First posted
Mar 18, 2013
Start
Apr 2011
Primary completionActual
Dec 2013
CompletionActual
Jun 2014
Last update
Mar 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01813188
Lead sponsor
Fundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias de la Region de Murcia
Collaborators
Carlos III Health Institute, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 18, 2013
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Jun 2014
Last update
Mar 30, 2017

Study contacts

Luis Meseguer Olmo, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion