ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01805752Updated Nov 2, 2016

Optimizing Integrated PMTCT Services in Rural North-Central Nigeria

An interventional study of Task-shifting to lower-cadre providers at PMTCT sites and POC CD4+ cell count testing in Suspected Damage to Fetus From Viral Disease in the Mother and HIV, sponsored by Vanderbilt University. Completed at 12 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-02.

Primary conditionAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
369
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Each year, an estimated 230,000 HIV-infected women in need of services for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) give birth in Nigeria, more than in any other nation in the world. Vanderbilt University (VU), through its affiliate, Friends in Global Health (FGH), is currently supporting HIV/AIDS services in North-Central Nigeria. These sites are predominantly rural primary health centers (PHCs) where shortages of high-cadre health care providers and insufficient laboratory capacity to perform CD4+ cell count testing have been major barriers to effective PMTCT scale-up. A systematic reassignment of patient care responsibilities coupled with the adoption of point-of-care (POC) CD4+ cell count testing will facilitate the ability of lower-cadre health providers to manage PMTCT care, including the provision and scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) to pregnant women in these rural, decentralized sites. A system wherein men are facilitated to accompany their wives to ANC appointments will create an important opportunity to address entrenched gender norms. The investigators therefore propose using community and facility-based measures to encourage male partners to accompany their spouses for ANC. As influential community members, male partners can assist their spouses to utilize culturally-sensitive, sustainable and integrated PMTCT care provided by lower-cadre providers in these resource-constrained settings.

The investigators propose a parallel, cluster randomized trial to evaluate the impact of a family-focused PMTCT package that includes: 1) task-shifting to lower-cadre providers at PMTCT sites; 2) POC CD4+ cell count testing; (3) integrated mother-infant care; and (4)) a prominent role for influential family members (male partners), working in close partnership with community-based health workers/volunteers. The specific aims of this study are:

  1. To evaluate whether implementation of the integrated PMTCT package in primary level antenatal clinics (ANC) increases the proportion of eligible pregnant women who initiate antiretroviral medications for the purposes of PMTCT. The investigators hypothesize that the provision of the PMTCT package in intervention clinics will improve PMTCT antiretroviral uptake rates among eligible women during pregnancy from 40% to 65%.
  2. To determine whether implementation of the PMTCT package improves postpartum retention of mother-infant pairs at 6 and 12 weeks. The investigators hypothesize that postpartum retention rates among mother-infant pairs attending intervention sites will be >20% higher at 6 weeks when compared to mother-infant pairs receiving care in non-intervention sites.
  3. Conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the impact of this novel PMTCT intervention compared to the existing standard-of-care referral model. The investigators hypothesize that the proposed intervention will be more cost-effective than the existing model of care.

In addition, two qualitative evaluations will be conducted in order to:

  1. Assess client satisfaction with health services, comparing PMTCT services provided by lower level vs. higher level cadre health workers; and
  2. Evaluate health care worker satisfaction with the new PMTCT service delivery model.
Read the detailed description

The investigators propose a parallel cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effects of the intervention. Twelve primary and secondary level health care facilities in Niger State will be randomized to the control (standard-of-care) or intervention arms. The investigators will match clinics on patient volume and level of facility and randomize to intervention and standard-of-care/control arms - 6 clinics per arm.

The investigators will make the proposed intervention available to all eligible women attending clinics that are randomized to the intervention arm. The drug regimens and general HIV care services provided as part of the package are standard of care, based on Nigerian national guidelines.

Inclusion Criteria: (1) HIV-infected women (and their infants) who present to ANC or delivery with unknown HIV status; (2) HIV-infected women (and their infants) with previous history of ARV prophylaxis or treatment, but who are not on prophylaxis or treatment at the time of presentation for antenatal care or delivery.

Exclusion Criteria: HIV-infected women with known status who are on ARV prophylaxis or treatment at the time of presentation to ANC.

Home-based care (HBC) workers will track clients who miss appointments at control and intervention sites. The HBC workers will document clients as terminated care if they: (1) discontinued services due to death or personal decision; (2) transferred their care to another clinic; or (3) are lost to follow-up (defined as being 90 days late for a clinic appointment plus 5 failed attempts at tracking the client). Clients will not receive any remuneration for participating in the study. Clients will be allowed to discontinue participation and decide that their medical data cannot be used in the analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Suspected Damage to Fetus From Viral Disease in the Mother
  • HIV

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prevention of mother to child HIV transmission
  • HIV/AIDS
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Unverified

3,035 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 306 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 369 is above the median of 96 across 2,251 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University is the lead sponsor of 522 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (63%) have results posted.

Compared within Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. -infected women (and their infants) who present to ANC or delivery with unknown HIV status;
  2. HIV-infected women (and their infants) with previous history of ARV prophylaxis or treatment, but who are not on prophylaxis or treatment at the time of presentation for antenatal care or delivery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-infected women with known status who are on ARV prophylaxis or treatment at the time of presentation to ANC.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
369 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Integrated family-focused PMTCT arm

    Intervention package includes: 1) task-shifting to lower-cadre providers at PMTCT sites; 2) POC CD4+ cell count testing; (3) integrated mother-infant care; and (4) a prominent role for influential family members (male partners), working in close partnership with community-based health workers/volunteers. Patients attending sites randomized to this arm will also receive group health education; opt-out HIV testing, same-day HIV test results; infant feeding counseling; HBC services; infant prophylaxis, early infant diagnosis, and linkage to family spacing services, if desired.

    Other: Task-shifting to lower-cadre providers at PMTCT sites · Other: POC CD4+ cell count testing · Other: integrated mother-infant care · Other: Prominent role for influential family members (male partners) in collaboration with CHWs

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Arm will receive standard of care activities, namely: group health education; opt-out HIV testing, same-day HIV test results; infant feeding counseling; HBC services; infant prophylaxis, early infant diagnosis, linkage to family spacing services, if desired.

Interventions

  • OtherTask-shifting to lower-cadre providers at PMTCT sites
  • OtherPOC CD4+ cell count testing
  • Otherintegrated mother-infant care
  • OtherProminent role for influential family members (male partners) in collaboration with CHWs
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of eligible pregnant women who initiate ART for purposes of PMTCT

    The primary outcome is the proportion of eligible women who initiate ARV medications for PMTCT. This will be determined through data in our electronic medical records system. The investigators will report the total proportion of women who initiate ARV drugs, presenting the results stratified by regimen (cART, ZDV, NVP) and type of facility. The investigators will also collect information on duration of cART.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postpartum retention of mother-infant pairs at 6 and 12 weeks post delivery

    Mother-infant pairs who have presented for their 6-week postpartum appointment will be considered active in the program (retained in care). The investigators will assess retention at both 6 week and 12-week time points in order to examine the impact of our intervention package on early (6 week) and later (12-week) postpartum retention.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. HIV-free infant survival at 6 weeks postpartum

    The study is not adequately powered to test this outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post delivery

  2. Cost effectiveness analysis of impact of integrated PMTCT package

    For the CEA, the basic outcome is the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER). The CER will be computed for both intervention and the standard-of-care arms. The investigators will also measure the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A separate ICER will be calculated for the two primary study outcomes (the cost/HIV-infected women who initiated treatment for PMTCT and the cost/mother-infant pair retained in care at 6 weeks postpartum) and for the secondary outcome (cost per infant infection averted at 6 weeks of age).

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • CHC Agwara
    Agwarra, Niger, Nigeria
  • Rural Hospital
    Auna, Niger, Nigeria
  • MCH Chanchaga
    Chanchaga, Niger, Nigeria
  • NCWS Farin Doki
    Farin Doki, Niger, Nigeria
  • BHC Garam
    Garam, Niger, Nigeria
  • PHC Gauraka
    Gauraka, Niger, Nigeria
  • BHC Ijah
    Ijah, Niger, Nigeria
  • BHC Izom
    Izom, Niger, Nigeria
  • Rural Hospital
    Kaffin Koro, Niger, Nigeria
  • MCH Paiko
    Paiko, Niger, Nigeria
  • BHC Wuse
    Wuse, Niger, Nigeria
  • Rural Hospital
    Aguie, Agaie, Niger
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aliyu MH, Blevins M, Audet C, Shepherd BE, Hassan A, Onwujekwe O, Gebi UI, Kalish M, Lindegren ML, Vermund SH, Wester CW. Optimizing PMTCT service delivery in rural North-Central Nigeria: protocol and design for a cluster randomized study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jun 29. PubMed 23816493 ↗
  • Aliyu MH, Blevins M, Audet CM, Kalish M, Gebi UI, Onwujekwe O, Lindegren ML, Shepherd BE, Wester CW, Vermund SH. Integrated prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission services, antiretroviral therapy initiation, and maternal and infant retention in care in rural north-central Nigeria: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2016 May;3(5):e202-11. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)00018-7. Epub 2016 Feb 24. PubMed 27126487 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be available to other researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2013, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Jun 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2013
First posted
Mar 6, 2013
Start
Mar 2013
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Jun 2016
Last update
Nov 2, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01805752
Responsible party
Muktar Aliyu (Assistant Professor of Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Jun 2016
Last update
Nov 2, 2016

Study contacts

Muktar H Aliyu, MBBS, DrPH
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion