ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01795859First-HDUpdated Sep 20, 2017Results posted

First Time Use of SD-809 in Huntington Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of SD-809 and Placebo in Chorea, sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.. Completed at 43 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-20.

Primary conditionHuntington DiseaseRegistry: ChoreaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Chorea — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Huntington Disease
Why
  1. The study's title name Huntington Disease, a narrower term within Chorea.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. (part of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether SD-809 tablets are effective in the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington's Disease.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SD-809 for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington's Disease. Approximately 90 subjects will be randomized (1:1) into the study, with approximately 45 subjects receiving SD-809 and 45 subjects receiving placebo. The study will be conducted at approximately 30 centers in the U.S. and Canada.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chorea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Huntington disease
  • Chorea
  • Tetrabenazine
03

In context

Huntington Disease Reclassified

293 studies on the registry are indexed under Huntington Disease; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 40 across 207 interventional studies indexed under Huntington Disease.

Browse Huntington Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (96%) have results posted.

Compared within Huntington Disease, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Chorea. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is at least 18 years of age or the age of majority (whichever is older) at Screening.
  • Subject has been diagnosed with manifest HD
  • Subject is able to swallow study medication whole.
  • Female subjects of agree to use an acceptable method of from screening through study completion.
  • The subject has a reliable caregiver who interacts with the patient on a daily basis, oversees study drug administration, assures attendance at study visits and participates in evaluations, as required.
  • Subject is able to ambulate without assistance for at least 20 yards (Note: The use of assistive devices (i.e., walker, cane) is permitted during ambulation).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a serious untreated or under-treated psychiatric illness, such as depression, at Screening or Baseline.
  • Subject has active suicidal ideation at Screening or Baseline.
  • Subject has history of suicidal behavior at Screening or Baseline:
  • Subject has evidence for depression at Screening or Baseline.
  • Subject has an unstable or serious medical or psychiatric illness at Screening or Baseline.
  • Subject has been recently exposed to tetrabenazine.
  • Subject has received any of the following concomitant medications within 30 days of Screening or Baseline:

    • Antipsychotics
    • Metoclopramide
    • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI)
    • Levodopa or dopamine agonists
    • Reserpine
    • Amantadine
    • Memantine
  • Subject has significantly impaired swallowing function at Screening.
  • Subject has significantly impaired speaking at Screening.
  • Subject requires treatment with drugs known to prolong the .
  • Subject has a prolonged QT interval on 12-lead at Screening.
  • Subject has evidence of hepatic impairment at Screening.
  • Subject has evidence of significant renal impairment at Screening.
  • Subject has known allergy to any of the components of study medication.
  • Subject has participated in an drug or device trial within 30 days (or 5 drug half-lives) of Screening, whichever is longer.
  • Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding at Screening or Baseline.
  • Subject acknowledges present use of illicit drugs at Screening.
  • Subject has a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the previous 12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SD-809 ER Tablets

    SD-809 ER tablets are available in three dose strengths: 6, 9 and 12 mg, all of which are identical in size, shape and color (white). All are administered three times a day, with the 6 mg final dose is placebo.

    Drug: SD-809 · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    SD-809 Tablets

    SD-809 tablets are available in three dose strengths: 6, 9 and 12 mg, all of which are identical in size, shape and color (white). All are administered three times a day, with the 6 mg final dose is placebo.

    Drug: SD-809 · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugSD-809

    SD-809 tablets are available in three dose strengths: 6, 9 and 12 mg, all of which are identical in size, shape and color (white).

    Also known as: deutetrabenazine

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo tablets are identical in appearance to SD-809 tablets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline (Average of Screening and Day 0) in the Average TMC Scores From Weeks 9 & 12

    Total TMC score is a sum of chorea scores which range 0-28, with a decrease indicating improvement in chorea

    Time frame: Screening, Day 0, Weeks 9, 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    A treatment success is defined as Much or Very Much Improved at the Week 12 visit. The PGIC is a 7-point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse to very much improved

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy Based on Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

    A treatment success is defined as Much or Very Much Improved at the Week 12 visit. The PGIC is a 7-point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse to very much improved. The clinician was asked to comment about the subject.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Score (Based on Items 3a to 3j) From Baseline to Week 12

    Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning score (based on items 3a to 3j) from Baseline to Week 12. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

  4. Change in Berg Balance Test (BBT)

    The Berg Balance Test (BBT) is a 14-item assessment of sitting, standing, transferring, and turning. Each task ranging from standing up from a sitting position, to standing on one foot each task is given a score of zero (unable) to four (independent), and the final measure is the sum of all of the scores.The scale range, which is 0-56, with higher scores indicating better balance/lower fall risk.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 11, 2017

Participant flow

A total of 90 subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either SD-809 or placebo. All subjects were assessed for capacity to provide informed consent and written informed consent was obtained appropriately

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSD-809 TabletsSD-809 Placebo
Started4545
Completed4443
Not completed12

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline (Average of Screening and Day 0) in the Average TMC Scores From Weeks 9 & 12

Total TMC score is a sum of chorea scores which range 0-28, with a decrease indicating improvement in chorea

Time frame:
Screening, Day 0, Weeks 9, 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline (Average of Screening and Day 0) in the Average TMC Scores From Weeks 9 & 12
Units on a scaleSD-809 TabletsSD-809 Placebo
Change From Baseline (Average of Screening and Day 0) in the Average TMC Scores From Weeks 9 & 12-4.42 ± 2.953-1.93 ± 2.666
Statistical analysis
  • SD-809 Tablets vs SD-809 Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Lsmean difference: -2.49 · 95% CI -3.69 to -1.29
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

A treatment success is defined as Much or Very Much Improved at the Week 12 visit. The PGIC is a 7-point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse to very much improved

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
ParticipantsSD-809 TabletsSD-809 Placebo
Number of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)239
Statistical analysis
  • SD-809 Tablets vs SD-809 Placebo · Difference of proportions · p = 0.0020 · Mean difference (final values): 31.1 · 95% CI 12.4 to 49.8
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy Based on Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

A treatment success is defined as Much or Very Much Improved at the Week 12 visit. The PGIC is a 7-point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse to very much improved. The clinician was asked to comment about the subject.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy Based on Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
ParticipantsSD-809 TabletsSD-809 Placebo
Number of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy Based on Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)196
Statistical analysis
  • SD-809 Tablets vs SD-809 Placebo · Difference of proportions · p = 0.0022 · Mean difference (final values): 28.9 · 95% CI 11.4 to 46.4
SecondaryChange in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Score (Based on Items 3a to 3j) From Baseline to Week 12

Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning score (based on items 3a to 3j) from Baseline to Week 12. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Score (Based on Items 3a to 3j) From Baseline to Week 12
units on a scaleSD-809 TabletsSD-809 Placebo
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Score (Based on Items 3a to 3j) From Baseline to Week 120.74 ± 9.773-3.61 ± 9.669
Statistical analysis
  • SD-809 Tablets vs SD-809 Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0308 · Lsmean difference: 4.34 · 95% CI 0.41 to 8.27
SecondaryChange in Berg Balance Test (BBT)

The Berg Balance Test (BBT) is a 14-item assessment of sitting, standing, transferring, and turning. Each task ranging from standing up from a sitting position, to standing on one foot each task is given a score of zero (unable) to four (independent), and the final measure is the sum of all of the scores.The scale range, which is 0-56, with higher scores indicating better balance/lower fall risk.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in Berg Balance Test (BBT)
units on a scaleSD-809 TabletsSD-809 Placebo
Change in Berg Balance Test (BBT)2.2 ± 3.471.3 ± 4.04
Statistical analysis
  • SD-809 Tablets vs SD-809 Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1415 · Mean difference (final values): 1.0 · 95% CI -0.3 to 2.3

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—1/45 (2.2%)21/45 (46.7%)
SD-809—1/45 (2.2%)18/45 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboSD-809
Cholecystitis chronicHepatobiliary disorders0/451/45
Agitated depressionPsychiatric disorders0/451/45
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/450/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboSD-809
IrritabilityGeneral disorders6/453/45
SomnolenceNervous system disorders2/455/45
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/454/45
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders3/454/45
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/452/45
DizzinessNervous system disorders4/452/45
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/450/45
FatigueGeneral disorders2/453/45
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/450/45
DepressionPsychiatric disorders3/451/45

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)SD-809 TabletsSD-809 PlaceboTotal
SD-80955.4 ± 10.3252.1 ± 13.3653.7 ± 11.98
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SD-809 TabletsSD-809 PlaceboTotal
Female231740
Male222850
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SD-809 TabletsSD-809 PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American055
White453883
More than one race022
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

43 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 057
    Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 038
    Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 298
    Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 050
    Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 052
    Englewood, Colorado, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 333
    Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 196
    Boca Raton, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 160
    Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 014
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 032
    Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 045
    Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 024
    Iowa City, Iowa, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 029
    Kansas City, Kansas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 083
    Wichita, Kansas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 087
    Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 028
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 040
    Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 027
    Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 194
    Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 328
    Camden, New Jersey, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 026
    New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 037
    Albany, New York, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 002
    New York, New York, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 342
    Patchogue, New York, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 119
    Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 089
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 020
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 093
    Toledo, Ohio, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 341
    Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 031
    Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 007
    Houston, Texas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 199
    Houston, Texas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 100
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 137
    Burlington, Vermont, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 220
    Kirkland, Washington, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 096
    Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 104
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 144
    Kew Vic, Australia
  • Teva Investigational Site 054
    Sydney, Australia
  • Teva Investigational Site 098
    Montreal, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 300
    North York, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 231
    Ottawa, Canada
  • Teva Investigational Site 300
    Ottawa, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rodrigues FB, Wild EJ. Huntington's Disease Clinical Trials Corner: February 2018. J Huntingtons Dis. 2018;7(1):89-98. doi: 10.3233/JHD-189001. PubMed 29480210 ↗
  • Claassen DO, Carroll B, De Boer LM, Wu E, Ayyagari R, Gandhi S, Stamler D. Indirect tolerability comparison of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine for Huntington disease. J Clin Mov Disord. 2017 Mar 1;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s40734-017-0051-5. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28265459 ↗
  • Huntington Study Group; Frank S, Testa CM, Stamler D, Kayson E, Davis C, Edmondson MC, Kinel S, Leavitt B, Oakes D, O'Neill C, Vaughan C, Goldstein J, Herzog M, Snively V, Whaley J, Wong C, Suter G, Jankovic J, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Claassen DO, Roman OC, Sung V, Smith J, Janicki S, Clouse R, Saint-Hilaire M, Hohler A, Turpin D, James RC, Rodriguez R, Rizer K, Anderson KE, Heller H, Carlson A, Criswell S, Racette BA, Revilla FJ, Nucifora F Jr, Margolis RL, Ong M, Mendis T, Mendis N, Singer C, Quesada M, Paulsen JS, Brashers-Krug T, Miller A, Kerr J, Dubinsky RM, Gray C, Factor SA, Sperin E, Molho E, Eglow M, Evans S, Kumar R, Reeves C, Samii A, Chouinard S, Beland M, Scott BL, Hickey PT, Esmail S, Fung WL, Gibbons C, Qi L, Colcher A, Hackmyer C, McGarry A, Klos K, Gudesblatt M, Fafard L, Graffitti L, Schneider DP, Dhall R, Wojcieszek JM, LaFaver K, Duker A, Neefus E, Wilson-Perez H, Shprecher D, Wall P, Blindauer KA, Wheeler L, Boyd JT, Houston E, Farbman ES, Agarwal P, Eberly SW, Watts A, Tariot PN, Feigin A, Evans S, Beck C, Orme C, Edicola J, Christopher E. Effect of Deutetrabenazine on Chorea Among Patients With Huntington Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):40-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8655. PubMed 27380342 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2013 to primary completion in Dec 2014, 16 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2017, 2 years 8 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jun 2015.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2013
First posted
Feb 21, 2013
StartActual
Aug 5, 2013
Primary completionActual
Dec 5, 2014
CompletionActual
Dec 5, 2014
Results delay requested
Jun 24, 2015
Results first posted
Aug 11, 2017
Last update
Sep 20, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01795859
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2013
Start date
Aug 5, 2013
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2014
Completion
Dec 5, 2014
Results posted
Aug 11, 2017
Last update
Sep 20, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Deutetrabenazine

Start the discussion