ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01775228Updated Jan 24, 2013

Effect of Peer Support Intervention on Early Recovery Outcomes Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

An interventional study of Peer Support in Cardiovascular Disease, sponsored by University of Calgary. Completed at 3 sites in Canada. Open to male participants aged 36 Years to 87 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-24.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
185
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
36 Years to 87 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Recovery from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a complex process involving physical recuperation and psychological adjustment. The high prevalence of postoperative depression in this population may threaten optimal recovery. Peer support over the recovery period has promise to mitigate this threat. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a professionally-guided telephone peer support intervention on recovery outcomes including depression, social support and health care resource utilization.

In a randomized controlled trial, 185 male CABG surgery patients randomly assigned to an intervention (n=61) or usual care (n=124) group. Participants in the intervention group received weekly telephone calls from a peer volunteer over 6 weeks post discharge. At hospital discharge and at 6 and 12 weeks follow up, depression was measured using the Beck Depression Scale-II, social support was measured using the Shortened Social Support Scale and health care resource utilization was measured using items in the Postoperative Self Report of Recovery Questionnaire. Participants in the intervention group were also asked questions about their perceptions regarding peer support using the Peer Support Evaluation Inventory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Disease

Keywords

  • Depression, peer support, recovery, health services
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 930 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 185 is above the median of 100 across 2,801 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 699 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
36 Years to 87 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • English speaking
  • > 35 years of age
  • undergoing first-time traditional (sternotomy approach) CABG surgery
  • an uncomplicated postoperative course
  • standard length of hospital stay (four to eight days)
  • had a telephone in the home
  • able to hear telephone conversation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had cardiac surgery procedures other than CABG surgery
  • resided in a nursing home or long term care facility
  • had any neurological or psychiatric disorder that may have impeded ability to self reflect or communicate
  • had emergent cardiac surgery
  • had sustained in-hospital post surgical complications of major significance (i.e., stroke, GI bleed, cardiac tamponade, renal failure, cardiac arrest, major sepsis of any origin, deep sternal wound infection, myocardial infarction with significant hemodynamic compromise)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
185 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Regular follow up care

    No intervention group - received routine follow up care following discharge from hospital after cardiac surgery (no peer support intervention).

  • Active comparator
    Peer Support intervention

    Support (informational, emotional and appraisal) in the form of like persons (i.e. age, gender) who have undergone CABG surgery with successful outcomes (post-recovery at least one year); peer support was provided by telephone for 6 weeks post cardiac surgery recovery.

    Behavioral: Peer Support

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeer Support

    Support (informational, emotional and appraisal) in the form of like persons (i.e. age, gender) who have undergone CABG surgery with successful outcomes (post-recovery at least one year); peer support was provided by telephone for 6 weeks post cardiac surgery recovery.

    Also known as: Social Support

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post operative depression

    A disorder of mood characterized by sadness and loss of interest in usually satisfying activities, a negative view of the self and hopelessness, passivity, indecisiveness, suicidal ideations, loss of appetite, weight loss, sleep disturbances, and other physical symptoms. Some or all of these symptoms may be present, and depression can be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe/major according to scores measured on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders - Fourth Edition) (DSM-IV criteria).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Post operative depression

    A disorder of mood characterized by sadness and loss of interest in usually satisfying activities, a negative view of the self and hopelessness, passivity, indecisiveness, suicidal ideations, loss of appetite, weight loss, sleep disturbances, and other physical symptoms. Some or all of these symptoms may be present, and depression can be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe/major according to scores measured on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders - Fourth Edition) (DSM-IV criteria).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceptions of recovery

    Includes biophysical recovery, return to activity, and return to social roles; perceptions focused on the absence or resolution of physiological and/or psychosocial clinical symptoms. (Perceptions of recovery were measured by the Postoperative Self-Report of Recovery Questionnaire (PSRRQ) over 12-weeks post-discharge.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks

  2. Perceptions of social support

    Resources provided by others that can take the form of emotional support, instrumental aid, information, and positive feedback as to one's importance, capabilities or self worth. Social support was measured using the Shortened Social Support Scale (SSSS).

    Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks

  3. Health services utilization

    The consumption of health services (emergency room visits, regularly scheduled and unscheduled family physician visits and readmission to hospital) to meet health care needs as defined by the patient or the health care professional. This was measured by the number of health care visits/readmissions to hospital over 12-weeks post-discharge using the Postoperative Self Report of Recovery (PSRRQ).

    Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Perceptions of peer support

    Evaluation of the different aspects of peer support received (supportive interactions, relationship qualities, perceived benefits, satisfactions with support received) as measured by the Peer Support Evaluation Inventory (PSEI).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Sudbury Regional Hospital
    Greater Sudbury, Ontario P3E2C6, Canada
  • Southlake Regional Health Centre
    Newmarket, Ontario N2C6J5, Canada
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4G 1R7, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Colella TJ, King KM. Peer support. An under-recognized resource in cardiac recovery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Sep;3(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2004.04.001. PubMed 15350230 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2006, a primary completion of Nov 2008 and a completion of Nov 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 29, 2012
First posted
Jan 24, 2013
Start
Nov 2006
Primary completionActual
Nov 2008
CompletionActual
Nov 2009
Last update
Jan 24, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01775228
Collaborators
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Council of Cardiovascular Nurses
Responsible party
Tracey JF Colella (RN, PhD, University of Calgary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2013
Start date
Nov 2006
Primary completion
Nov 2008
Completion
Nov 2009
Last update
Jan 24, 2013

Study contacts

Kathryn King, PhD
principal investigator · University of Calgary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion