CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01773954ATLASUpdated May 2, 2018Results posted

Repeated Eye Injections of Aflibercept for Treatment of Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration

An interventional study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Macular Degeneration, sponsored by MidAtlantic Retina. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-02.

Sponsored by MidAtlantic Retina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the visual outcome and number of injections required during an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided treat and extend regimen with intravitreal aflibercept for treatment of subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to see how using "treat and extend," a method of determining how often a patient with NVAMD should visit the retina clinic and receive treatments, affects vision in patients with this condition after treatment. The treatment the investigators are using in this study is an eye injection of a drug called aflibercept (also called EYLEA). Eylea is FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved for treatment of wet age related macular degeneration.

The investigators hope that "treat and extend" strikes the right balance between making sure patients get all of the treatments needed, but not giving patients too many treatments (so that the side effects of treatments are minimized and so that patients don't have to make more visits than they need to maintain maximum visual gain). The experimental part of this study is determining this "right balance" of eye injections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Age-Related Macular Degeneration
  • Macular Degeneration

Keywords

  • amd
  • age related macular degeneration
  • macular degeneration
  • neovascular
03

In context

Macular Degeneration

1,474 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 206 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 51 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

MidAtlantic Retina is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients older than 55 years with treatment naïve, active subfoveal NVAMD demonstrating macular fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA).
  • Only one eye for each patient demonstrating a pre-treatment acuity of 20/25 - 20/320 is eligible
  • Patients cannot have concurrent progressive retinal disease in the study eye.
  • Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
  • Provide signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment for NVAMD in the study eye,
  • Prior experimental treatment of NVAMD in either eye
  • Prior treatment with systemic anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agents
  • Prior treatment with verteporfin, plaque brachytherapy, or external-beam radiation therapy, or transpupillary thermotherapy in the study eye
  • Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation involving the foveal center in the study eye
  • History of vitreo surgical intervention in the study eye. Cataract surgery is permitted.
  • Concurrent eye disease in the study eye that could compromise visual acuity (e.g. diabetic retinopathy, advanced glaucoma)
  • Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g. diabetic retinopathy or glaucoma) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could either
  • require medical or surgical intervention during the 52 weeks study period to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition, or
  • allowed to progress untreated, could likely contribute to loss of at least 2 Snellen equivalent lines of best corrected visual acuity over the 52 weeks study period
  • Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye, or history of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye
  • Current vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye
  • History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole (Stage 3 or 4) in the study eye
  • Active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye
  • Aphakia, Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens (ACIOL), or unstable Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens (PCIOL).
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication)
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Sexually active men* or women of childbearing potential** who are unwilling to practice adequate contraception during the study (adequate contraceptive measures include stable use of oral contraceptives or other prescription pharmaceutical contraceptives for 2 or more menstrual cycles prior to screening; intrauterine device [IUD]; bilateral tubal ligation; vasectomy; condom plus contraceptive sponge, foam, or jelly, or diaphragm plus contraceptive sponge, foam, or jelly)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection More

    Patient receives treatment at baseline and week 4 visit. The first time extension criteria are met the follow-up interval will be increased by 4 weeks. Each time the extension criteria is met the interval will be extended by 2 weeks to a maximum of 16 weeks. If a patient is being followed at an 8 week interval but fails to meet extension criteria at a particular visit, treatment will be administered as usual and the follow up interval will be reduced to 4 weeks. If patient is being followed at 10-16 week interval but fails to meet extension criteria at a particular visit, treatment will be administered but the follow-up interval will be reduced by 2 week increments.

    Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection

Interventions

  • DrugIntravitreal Aflibercept Injection

    Increased or decreased time between visits

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Total Thickness at the Foveal Center Point on OCT

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

07

Results

Posted May 2, 2018
Limitations and caveats
This is a non-controlled, non-comparative open label study.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntravitreal Aflibercept
Started40
Completed31
Not completed9

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score
Time frame:
Baseline to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · letters
Mean Change in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score
lettersIntravitreal Aflibercept
Mean Change in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score7.2 (2.9 to 11.6)
Other pre-specifiedChange in Total Thickness at the Foveal Center Point on OCT
Time frame:
Baseline to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · micrometers
Change in Total Thickness at the Foveal Center Point on OCT
micrometersIntravitreal Aflibercept
Change in Total Thickness at the Foveal Center Point on OCT-143 (-187 to -99)

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intravitreal Aflibercept2/40 (5%)2/40 (5%)0/40 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIntravitreal Aflibercept
Fatal MICardiac disorders1/40
EndophthalmitisEye disorders1/40

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intravitreal Aflibercept
Mean81.3 ± 7.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intravitreal Aflibercept
Female23
Male17
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intravitreal Aflibercept
United States40
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Mid Atlantic Retina- Cherry Hill
    Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002, United States
  • Mid Atlantic Retina- Huntingdon Valley
    Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania 19006, United States
  • Mid Atlantic Retina- Wills Eye Institute
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01773954
Lead sponsor
MidAtlantic Retina
Collaborators
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
MidAtlantic Retina (Investigator, Wills Eye) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 23, 2013
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Results posted
May 2, 2018
Last update
May 2, 2018

Study contacts

Carl Regillo, MD
principal investigator · Wills Eye Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion