An interventional study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Macular Degeneration, sponsored by MidAtlantic Retina. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-02.
Sponsored by MidAtlantic Retina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To evaluate the visual outcome and number of injections required during an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided treat and extend regimen with intravitreal aflibercept for treatment of subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD).
The purpose of this study is to see how using "treat and extend," a method of determining how often a patient with NVAMD should visit the retina clinic and receive treatments, affects vision in patients with this condition after treatment. The treatment the investigators are using in this study is an eye injection of a drug called aflibercept (also called EYLEA). Eylea is FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved for treatment of wet age related macular degeneration.
The investigators hope that "treat and extend" strikes the right balance between making sure patients get all of the treatments needed, but not giving patients too many treatments (so that the side effects of treatments are minimized and so that patients don't have to make more visits than they need to maintain maximum visual gain). The experimental part of this study is determining this "right balance" of eye injections.
1,474 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 206 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 51 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.
Browse Macular Degeneration studies →MidAtlantic Retina is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient receives treatment at baseline and week 4 visit. The first time extension criteria are met the follow-up interval will be increased by 4 weeks. Each time the extension criteria is met the interval will be extended by 2 weeks to a maximum of 16 weeks. If a patient is being followed at an 8 week interval but fails to meet extension criteria at a particular visit, treatment will be administered as usual and the follow up interval will be reduced to 4 weeks. If patient is being followed at 10-16 week interval but fails to meet extension criteria at a particular visit, treatment will be administered but the follow-up interval will be reduced by 2 week increments.
Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection
Increased or decreased time between visits
Mean Change in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in Total Thickness at the Foveal Center Point on OCT
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
| Milestone | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| Started | 40 |
| Completed | 31 |
| Not completed | 9 |
| letters | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| Mean Change in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score | 7.2 (2.9 to 11.6) |
| micrometers | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| Change in Total Thickness at the Foveal Center Point on OCT | -143 (-187 to -99) |
Collected over 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intravitreal Aflibercept | 2/40 (5%) | 2/40 (5%) | 0/40 (0%) |
| Event | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| Fatal MICardiac disorders | 1/40 |
| EndophthalmitisEye disorders | 1/40 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| Mean | 81.3 ± 7.4 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| Female | 23 |
| Male | 17 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Intravitreal Aflibercept |
|---|---|
| United States | 40 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
MidAtlantic Retina