ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01771523Updated Jan 18, 2013

Is the Use of Drain for Thyroid Surgery Realistic?

An interventional study of Thyroidectomy and use of drain in Goiter, sponsored by Maltepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-18.

Sponsored by Maltepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background : The use of suction drains in thyroid surgery is common practice in order to avoid haematoma or seroma, as well as to identify promptly the onset of haemorrhaging that might compromise the patient's airway. The aim of this study to determine the effects of routine drainage compared to no drainage in thyroidectomy patients.

Study Design : Total of 400 patients who undergoing total thyroidectomy or lobectomy for thyroidal disorders will be randomly allocated to be drained or not. Postoperative ultrasonographic (USG) neck examination will be performed for all patients on postoperative 24th hour by the same ultrasonologist each time. Postoperative pain, complications and hospital stay will be recorded. The statistical analysis will be performed and p\<0,05 will be accepted as an important statistical value (SPSS 16.0 for Windows).

Read the detailed description

Patients will include in the study will randomly allocate to drain and non-drain group on the basis of computer generated random number table. Patients with substernal goitre or non differentiated cancer will exclude from the study.

According to the thyroidal disorder, total thyroidectomy or lobectomy plus isthmectomy will be performed. The operating time will be defined as the time from the first incision to the last suture's placement. 4/0 polypropylene sutures will be used subcutaneously for wound closure. In the drain group a closed suction drain with negative pressure (Hemovac®) was brought out through a separate wound.

02

Conditions studied

  • Goiter

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • thyroidectomy
  • drain use
03

In context

Goiter

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Goiter; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 100 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Goiter.

Browse Goiter studies →

Lead sponsor

Maltepe University is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients required thyroidectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with substernal goitre or non differentiated cancer
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1

    thyroidectomy

    Procedure: Thyroidectomy

  • Active comparator
    Group 2

    thyroidectomy use of drain

    Procedure: Thyroidectomy · Device: use of drain

Interventions

  • ProcedureThyroidectomy

    total thyroidectomy or lobectomy

  • Deviceuse of drain

    drain will be used

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative fluid accumulation (ml.)

    Standard thyroidectomy is proven method for safety. We will perform standard thyroidectomy in this study. In this period, patients will be monitored for bleeding and seroma. Major bleeding rare complication for thyroid surgery but requires re-operation immediately. Many studies suggested that drains may block with clotted blood and do not alert the surgeon, even if major bleeding occurs(1,2,3). We don't use drain routinely in standard thyroidectomy in our clinic for seven years. Bleeding and reoperation rates are similar between the literature and our clinic. The amount of fluid collection in thyroid bed will be assessed by Ultrasonography in postoperative 24th hours. Volume of fluid collection in the operative bed will be calculated by measuring the maximum diameter in three dimensions.Similar results between groups are evidence that the use of drain is not necessary.

    Time frame: Postoperative first 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain score on the visual analog scale (0-10)

    Postoperative pain will be assessed according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) on the postoperative sixth hour (POSH-VAS) and postoperative first day (POFD-VAS).The mean VAS scores will be compared drain and non-drain group.

    Time frame: 6th hours and 24th hours

Other outcomes

  1. Number of postoperative complications.

    We will demonstrate there was no significant differences in postoperative complications between subgroups.Similar complications rates will be demonstrate absence of drains for thyroid surgery is safe and efficient.

    Time frame: postoperative first 6th hour, 24th hour, third day, third month, sixth month, first year

  2. Length of hospital stay

    Use of drain increases length of hospital stay.

    Time frame: postoperative period (days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maltepe University School of Medicine, General Surgery Department
    İstanbul, 34843, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deveci U, Altintoprak F, Sertan Kapakli M, Manukyan MN, Cubuk R, Yener N, Kebudi A. Is the use of a drain for thyroid surgery realistic? A prospective randomized interventional study. J Thyroid Res. 2013;2013:285768. doi: 10.1155/2013/285768. Epub 2013 May 30. PubMed 23819100 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2010, a primary completion of Jan 2013 and a completion of Jan 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2011
First posted
Jan 18, 2013
Start
Jan 2010
Primary completionActual
Jan 2013
CompletionActual
Jan 2013
Last update
Jan 18, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01771523
Lead sponsor
Maltepe University
Responsible party
manuk norayk manukyan (Associated Professor, Maltepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 18, 2013
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Jan 2013
Last update
Jan 18, 2013

Study contacts

Uğur Deveci, Ass. Prof.
principal investigator · Maltepe University, School of Medicine , General Surgery Department
Manuk N. Manukyan, Ass.Prof.
study director · Maltepe University, School of Medicine, General Surgery Department
Abut Kebudi, Prof.
study chair · Maltepe University, School of Medicine, General Surgery Department
Fatih Altintoprak, Ass.Prof.
principal investigator · Sakarya University, School of Medicine, General Surgery Department
Neşe Yener, Ass.Prof.
principal investigator · Maltepe University, School of Medicine, Pathology Department
Sertan Kapakli, Ass.Prof.
principal investigator · Maltepe University, School of Medicine, General Surgery Department
Rahmi Çubuk, Ass.Prof.
principal investigator · Maltepe University, School of Medicine, Radiology Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion