ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01734811MV130Updated Nov 8, 2021Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in Recurrent Wheezing Attacks

A Phase 3 interventional study of Biological vaccine in Bronchospasm; Bronchiolitis and Bronchospasm; Bronchitis, sponsored by Inmunotek S.L.. Completed at 2 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 36 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-08.

Sponsored by Inmunotek S.L. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Months to 36 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will be conducted in two hospitals of the same geographic area. It will be included children \<3-years-old with recurrent wheezing attacks, confirmed by the review of the medical records, in the previous 12 months or a shorter time for those younger than one year.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study will included 120 children \<3 years old with ≥3 episodes of wheezing during the previous year. They will receive active treatment or placebo for six months. The main outcome will be the number of wheezing attacks during one year. Other outcomes were duration and severity of wheezing attacks , symptom and medication scores, and use of health resources.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchospasm; Bronchiolitis
  • Bronchospasm; Bronchitis

Keywords

  • Vaccine
  • Bronchospasm
03

In context

Bronchial Spasm

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchial Spasm; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 70 across 29 interventional studies indexed under Bronchial Spasm.

Browse Bronchial Spasm studies →

Lead sponsor

Inmunotek S.L. is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Months to 36 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects whose parents /legal representative have given written .
  • Both gender
  • Subject up to 36 months of age.
  • Subjects with recurrent bronchospasms (wheezing attacks); 3 or more exacerbations in the last 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects whose parents/legal representative have not given written .
  • Subjects out of aged range
  • Subjects with or chemotherapy treatment
  • Subjects included in another clinical trial in the last 12 months.
  • Subject in or immunostimulatory treatment
  • Subjects who have received iv gamma globulin in the past 12 months.
  • Subjects diagnosed with candidiasis or fungal recurrent infections.
  • Subjects diagnosed with malabsorption syndrome
  • Subjects with clinical allergy to common aeroallergens in the geographical area.
  • Subjects with hepatitis virus infections, and tuberculosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The subjects will receive daily placebo spray (2 puff of 100 µL) for 6 months, followed by other 6 months of observation

    Biological: Biological vaccine

  • Experimental
    Biological vaccine

    The subjects will receive daily biological vaccines pray (2 puff of 100 µL) of for 6 months, followed by other 6 months of observation

    Biological: Biological vaccine

Interventions

  • BiologicalBiological vaccine

    daily spray (2 puff of 100 µL) for six months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Recurrent Bronchospasm (Wheezing Attacks)

    Assessment of reduction of bronchospasm (wheezing attacks) episodes at 12 months. The number of bronchospasm (wheezing attacks) episodes, in active and placebo group will be compared

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration (Days) of Wheezing Attacks (WA)

    Review of bronchospasm (wheezing attacks) duration per patient

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Time Until Appearance of First WA

    time (days) until appearance of first wheezing attack (WA)

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of Days With Wheezing Attacks During the Study

    Review of the number of days with wheezing attacks during the study

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of Patients With Recurrent WA During the Study

    Review of number of patients with recurrent WA during the whole study

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Symptom Score During Wheezing Attacks

    Total of Symptom score during wheezing attacks. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. These scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Scale use to evaluate symptom during wheezing attacks is called the Symptom scores (SS) scale. Minimum value is 0 (meant improvement) and maximum value (meant not improvement) is 3. The rating was: 0=absent (no sign/symptom evident); 1=mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3=severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily life and/or sleeping). Fever was scored as number of days with temperature over 37ºC. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the wheezing attacks.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Medication Score During WA

    Review of medication consumption during wheezing attacks. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. Medication scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Medication was rated from 0 (minimum value) and the maximum value correspond to the maximum medication consumed per 24h. Rating was according to Dreborg et al. with slight modifications: two points were given for one tablet of 4 mg of Montelukast, for one puff of 50 μg budesonide-equivalent or for one dose of oral prednisolone, and 3 for the inhalation of one puff of 200 μg budesonide-equivalent. In the case of antibiotics and antipyretic/-anti-inflammatory drugs, the number of daily doses of these drugs was recorded. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the wheezing attacks.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Overall Symptom Score

    Review of symptoms during the whole study. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. These scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Scale use to evaluate symptom during wheezing attacks is called the Symptom scores (SS) scale. Minimum value is 0 (meant improvement) and maximum value (meant not improvement) is 3. The rating was: 0=absent (no sign/symptom evident); 1=mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3=severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily life and/or sleeping). Fever was scored as number of days with temperature over 37ºC. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the whole study

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Overall Medication Score

    Review of medication consumption during the whole study. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. Medication scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Medication was rated from 0 (minimum value) and the maximum value correspond to the maximum medication consumed per 24h. Rating was according to Dreborg et al. with slight modifications: two points were given for one tablet of 4 mg of Montelukast, for one puff of 50 μg budesonide-equivalent or for one dose of oral prednisolone, and 3 for the inhalation of one puff of 200 μg budesonide-equivalent. In the case of antibiotics and antipyretic/-anti-inflammatory drugs, the number of daily doses of these drugs was recorded. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the whole study.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Use of Health and Social Resources During the Whole Period of the Study.

    The use of health and social resources during the study was also recorded: days of hospitalization in ward and/or intensive care unit, visits to the emergency units, unscheduled visits to the pediatrician and/or to the specialist, telephone calls to the pediatrician, complementary tests (chest radiogram, blood analysis, others), days of school absenteeism and caregiver-days when the children needed them. The data were obtained from the diary cards and confirmed through the review of medical records. Maximum value corresponds to the maximum days spent in health resources (specified above) and the minimum value corresponds to the minimum of days spent in health resources (specified above)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 4, 2020

Participant flow

October 2012 - May 2015 subjects enrollment. 120 children \<3 years old with recurrent WA, defined as 3 or more episodes of WA during the previous year. . WA were confirmed by the review of the medical records. Aeroallergen sensitization at baseline was used as an exclusion criterion to avoid an eventual WA due to allergic asthma.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboBiological Vaccine
Started5862
Completed5459
Not completed43
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Recurrent Bronchospasm (Wheezing Attacks)

Assessment of reduction of bronchospasm (wheezing attacks) episodes at 12 months. The number of bronchospasm (wheezing attacks) episodes, in active and placebo group will be compared

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · events
Number of Recurrent Bronchospasm (Wheezing Attacks)
eventsPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Number of Recurrent Bronchospasm (Wheezing Attacks)299176
SecondaryDuration (Days) of Wheezing Attacks (WA)

Review of bronchospasm (wheezing attacks) duration per patient

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Duration (Days) of Wheezing Attacks (WA)
daysPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Duration (Days) of Wheezing Attacks (WA)7.9 (6.2 to 11.0)6.0 (4.0 to 9.5)
SecondaryTime Until Appearance of First WA

time (days) until appearance of first wheezing attack (WA)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Time Until Appearance of First WA
daysPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Time Until Appearance of First WA5.0 (2.0 to 28.8)41.0 (15.0 to 94.5)
SecondaryNumber of Days With Wheezing Attacks During the Study

Review of the number of days with wheezing attacks during the study

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Number of Days With Wheezing Attacks During the Study
daysPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Number of Days With Wheezing Attacks During the Study42.0 (17.0 to 57.5)19.2 (8.5 to 35.0)
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Recurrent WA During the Study

Review of number of patients with recurrent WA during the whole study

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Recurrent WA During the Study
ParticipantsPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Number of Patients With Recurrent WA During the Study4536
SecondarySymptom Score During Wheezing Attacks

Total of Symptom score during wheezing attacks. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. These scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Scale use to evaluate symptom during wheezing attacks is called the Symptom scores (SS) scale. Minimum value is 0 (meant improvement) and maximum value (meant not improvement) is 3. The rating was: 0=absent (no sign/symptom evident); 1=mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3=severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily life and/or sleeping). Fever was scored as number of days with temperature over 37ºC. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the wheezing attacks.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Symptom Score During Wheezing Attacks
units on a scalePlaceboBiological Vaccine
Symptom Score During Wheezing Attacks155.0 (79.0 to 244.5)80.0 (19.5 to 154.5)
SecondaryMedication Score During WA

Review of medication consumption during wheezing attacks. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. Medication scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Medication was rated from 0 (minimum value) and the maximum value correspond to the maximum medication consumed per 24h. Rating was according to Dreborg et al. with slight modifications: two points were given for one tablet of 4 mg of Montelukast, for one puff of 50 μg budesonide-equivalent or for one dose of oral prednisolone, and 3 for the inhalation of one puff of 200 μg budesonide-equivalent. In the case of antibiotics and antipyretic/-anti-inflammatory drugs, the number of daily doses of these drugs was recorded. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the wheezing attacks.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Medication Score During WA
units on a scalePlaceboBiological Vaccine
Medication Score During WA424.0 (185.0 to 738.5)164.0 (43.5 to 311.5)
SecondaryOverall Symptom Score

Review of symptoms during the whole study. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. These scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Scale use to evaluate symptom during wheezing attacks is called the Symptom scores (SS) scale. Minimum value is 0 (meant improvement) and maximum value (meant not improvement) is 3. The rating was: 0=absent (no sign/symptom evident); 1=mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3=severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily life and/or sleeping). Fever was scored as number of days with temperature over 37ºC. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the whole study

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Overall Symptom Score
units on a scalePlaceboBiological Vaccine
Overall Symptom Score421.0 (303.0 to 673.0)276.5 (151.0 to 426.0)
SecondaryOverall Medication Score

Review of medication consumption during the whole study. The patients were reviewed at our clinics every three months. Medication scores were recorded daily in a diary card by the parents, who were duly instructed. Medication was rated from 0 (minimum value) and the maximum value correspond to the maximum medication consumed per 24h. Rating was according to Dreborg et al. with slight modifications: two points were given for one tablet of 4 mg of Montelukast, for one puff of 50 μg budesonide-equivalent or for one dose of oral prednisolone, and 3 for the inhalation of one puff of 200 μg budesonide-equivalent. In the case of antibiotics and antipyretic/-anti-inflammatory drugs, the number of daily doses of these drugs was recorded. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of all individual scores during the whole study.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Overall Medication Score
units on a scalePlaceboBiological Vaccine
Overall Medication Score1043.5 (669.5 to 1696.0)618.5 (318.3 to 1035.5)
Other pre-specifiedUse of Health and Social Resources During the Whole Period of the Study.

The use of health and social resources during the study was also recorded: days of hospitalization in ward and/or intensive care unit, visits to the emergency units, unscheduled visits to the pediatrician and/or to the specialist, telephone calls to the pediatrician, complementary tests (chest radiogram, blood analysis, others), days of school absenteeism and caregiver-days when the children needed them. The data were obtained from the diary cards and confirmed through the review of medical records. Maximum value corresponds to the maximum days spent in health resources (specified above) and the minimum value corresponds to the minimum of days spent in health resources (specified above)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Use of Health and Social Resources During the Whole Period of the Study.
daysPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Use of Health and Social Resources During the Whole Period of the Study.14.5 (2 to 52)11.0 (0 to 44)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 12 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/58 (0%)1/58 (1.7%)0/58 (0%)
Biological Vaccine0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboBiological Vaccine
Epilectic seizureNervous system disorders1/58—

Baseline characteristics

\<3 years old with recurrent WA, defined as 3 or more episodes of WA during the previous year.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PlaceboBiological VaccineTotal
<=18 years5862120
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Months)PlaceboBiological VaccineTotal
Mean23 ± 823 ± 723 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboBiological VaccineTotal
Female262551
Male323769
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PlaceboBiological VaccineTotal
Spain5862120
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hospital de Manises
    Manises, Valencia 46940, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Alecsandru D, Valor L, Sanchez-Ramon S, Gil J, Carbone J, Navarro J, Rodriguez J, Rodriguez-Sainz C, Fernandez-Cruz E. Sublingual therapeutic immunization with a polyvalent bacterial preparation in patients with recurrent respiratory infections: immunomodulatory effect on antigen-specific memory CD4+ T cells and impact on clinical outcome. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011 Apr;164(1):100-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04320.x. PubMed 21391984 ↗
  • Nieto A, Mazon A, Nieto M, Calderon R, Calaforra S, Selva B, Uixera S, Palao MJ, Brandi P, Conejero L, Saz-Leal P, Fernandez-Perez C, Sancho D, Subiza JL, Casanovas M. Bacterial Mucosal Immunotherapy with MV130 Prevents Recurrent Wheezing in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 15;204(4):462-472. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0520OC. PubMed 33705665 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01734811
Lead sponsor
Inmunotek S.L.
Collaborators
Unidad de Investigacion Medica en Epidemiologia Clinica
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
Feb 2017
Results posted
Sep 4, 2020
Last update
Nov 8, 2021

Study contacts

Miguel Casanovas, PhD; MD
study director

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion