CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01732536RESOLVEUpdated Jul 20, 2018Results posted

Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant for Recurrent Nasal Polyps

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of S8 Sinus Implant and Sham procedure in Chronic Sinusitis and Nasal Polyps, sponsored by Intersect ENT. Completed at 19 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-20.

Sponsored by Intersect ENT · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The RESOLVE Study is a randomized controlled trial with the S8 Sinus Implant in 100 chronic sinusitis patients with recurrent nasal polyps.

Read the detailed description

RESOLVE is a randomized (1:1), sham-controlled, parallel group, double-blind multicenter study in 100 chronic sinusitis patients who had prior endoscopic sinus surgery and presented with recurrent nasal polyps. The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the S8 Sinus Implant, a steroid-eluting sinus implant, consisting of a bioabsorbable self-expanding sinus implant coated with 1350 mcg of mometasone furoate (MF) and a single-use delivery system. Implant is placed in-office in the ethmoid sinus under local anesthesia. The coating on the S8 implant provides controlled release of MF to the sinus mucosa over 90 days, with the majority of drug released within 60 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Sinusitis
  • Nasal Polyps

Keywords

  • corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant
  • chronic rhinosinusitis
  • mometasone furoate
  • polyposis
03

In context

Sinusitis

415 studies on the registry are indexed under Sinusitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Sinusitis.

Browse Sinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Intersect ENT is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Candidates for this study had to meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria:

  1. General Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patient has provided written informed consent using a form approved by the reviewing IRB.
  2. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age.
  3. Patient is willing and able to comply with protocol requirements.
  4. Patient has a previous confirmed diagnosis of CS defined as inflammation of the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses.
  5. Patient has undergone bilateral total ethmoidectomy (must be at least 90 day beyond the date of last sinus surgery).
  6. Patient has recurrent bilateral sinus obstruction due to polyposis (Grades 1 through 3 only).
  7. Patient must have a Grade 2 polyposis on at least 1 ethmoid side.
  8. Patient is able to tolerate the use of Nasonex topical intranasal steroid spray once daily.
  9. Patient is indicated for a repeat ESS per the study definition. Patient must have: (i) a minimum symptom burden on the SNOT 22, consisting of a minimum score of 2 on at least 2 of the 5 hallmark symptoms of CS (nasal blockage, post-nasal discharge, thick nasal discharge, facial pain/pressure, and decreased sense of smell); (ii) persistent symptoms of CS despite ongoing treatment with topical intranasal steroid irrigations or sprays at least once daily for at least 2 weeks preceding enrollment; (iii) had treatment with a high-dose form of steroids (e.g., oral, parenteral, injection into polyps) and/or sinus steroid irrigations within the preceding 2 years, or refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; (iv) a known history of repeated courses of treatment with aggressive steroid therapy for recurrent sinusitis; and (v) endoscopic evidence of polyp recurrence, scarring, and/or obstructive mucosal edema.
  10. Patient is able to tolerate use of topical/local anesthesia and the implant procedure in an office or clinic setting.
  11. In the opinion of the physician, treatment with S8 Sinus Implant or sham procedure is technically feasible (able to pass 5-9 mm device into middle meatus) bilaterally.
  12. Female patients of child-bearing potential must not be pregnant and must agree to not become pregnant during the course of the study.
  13. Female patients of child-bearing potential must agree to use consistent and acceptable method/s of birth control during the course of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Candidates were excluded if they met ANY of the following criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patient had bilateral total ethmoidectomy less than 90 days previously.
  2. Patient had Propel implanted postoperatively less than 90 days previously.
  3. Patient has presence of adhesions/synechiae Grades 3 or 4.
  4. Patient has presence of severe scarring or adhesions within the ethmoid cavity itself.
  5. Patient has presence of Grade 4 polyposis.
  6. Patient has known history of immune deficiency (e.g., IGG] subclass deficiency or IGA deficiency, HIV).
  7. Patient has concurrent condition requiring active chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy management for the disease (e.g., cancer, HIV, etc.).
  8. Patient has oral-steroid dependent condition such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma or other condition.
  9. Patient has known history of allergy or intolerance to corticosteroids or mometasone furoate (MF).
  10. Patient has known history of resistance or poor response to oral steroids.
  11. Patient has presence of physical obstruction that would preclude access to either ethmoid sinus for device delivery (e.g., severe septal deviation, septal spur, very small middle meatus, total obstruction of the nasal passage with severe scarring, polyposis).
  12. Patient has clinical evidence of acute bacterial sinusitis (e.g., acute increase in purulent discharge, fever, facial pain etc.).
  13. Patient has clinical evidence or suspicion of invasive fungal sinusitis (e.g., bone erosion on prior CT scan, necrotic sinus tissue, etc.).
  14. Patient has evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments during the 6 month follow-up period.
  15. Patient is currently participating in or recently participated in another clinical trial (within the last 30 days).
  16. Patient has history of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
  17. Patient has previously undergone ESS and experienced a CSF leak or has residual compromised vision as a result of a complication in a prior ESS procedure.
  18. Patient has completely resected middle turbinate.
  19. Patient has known dehiscence of the lamina papyracea.
  20. Patient has evidence of active viral illness (e.g., tuberculosis, ocular herpes simplex, chickenpox, or measles).

    Ocular Exclusion Criteria

  21. Patient has history or diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (baseline or a known prior ocular exam indicating IOP >21 mm Hg)
  22. Patient has closed angle (with or without the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy)
  23. Patient has presence in either eye of: (i) posterior subcapsular cataract, (ii) nuclear sclerosis of Grade +3 or higher; or (iii) cortical cataract of Grade +3 or higher.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    S8 Sinus Implant

    In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily

    Drug: S8 Sinus Implant · Drug: Mometasone furoate nasal spray

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    In-office bilateral sham procedure Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily

    Procedure: Sham procedure · Drug: Mometasone furoate nasal spray

Interventions

  • DrugS8 Sinus Implant

    In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses

    Also known as: SINUVA (mometasone furoate) sinus implant

  • ProcedureSham procedure

    In-office bilateral sham procedure

  • DrugMometasone furoate nasal spray

    Two sprays in each nostril once daily, totaling 200 mcg of mometasone furoate throughout Day 90

    Also known as: Nasonex Nasal Spray

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score

    Nasal Obstruction by patients using a paper questionnaire on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Bilateral Polyp Grade

    Polyp grade was determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction

    Percentage of the ethmoid sinus volume obstructed by scarring, polyps, or edema on endoscopy, as determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (absence of obstruction) to 100 (complete obstruction). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in ethmoid sinus obstruction.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Bilateral Polyp Grade

    Polyps were graded by clinical investigators on a scale from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal polyps.

    Time frame: 90 days, 6 months

  3. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score

    NOSE scale is a validated symptom scoring instrument consisting of 5 questions each scored by patients on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (severe problem), then multiplied by 5 and resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in NOSE score.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)

    To be indicated for RESS, the following criteria had to be met: * Continued to use topical intranasal steroids daily; * Continued to complain of at least 2 symptoms of chronic sinusitis despite ongoing topical intranasal steroid use * Needed or had received at least 1 course of aggressive steroid therapy or had refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; and * Had endoscopic evidence of persisting ethmoid sinus obstruction (bilateral polyp grade \>=2 on at least one side)

    Time frame: 90 days, 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 20, 2018
Limitations and caveats
1. Absence of defined medical regimen prior to enrollment 2. Investigators grading polyps and assessing indication for RESS were not blinded 3. Indication for RESS at baseline allowed for 1 sinus side to have polyp grade \>=1

Participant flow

Patients were enrolled between January 2013 and November 2013 at 18 clinical sites (12 private, 6 academic).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatmentControl
Started5347
Completed5246
Not completed11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNasal Obstruction/Congestion Score

Nasal Obstruction by patients using a paper questionnaire on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
units on a scaleTreatmentControl
Baseline3.62 ± 1.1803.30 ± 1.159
Day 902.31 ± 1.4222.62 ± 1.336
Change from baseline-1.33 ± 1.465-0.67 ± 1.446
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.1365Based on between group comparison using ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate and site and treatment as fixed effects
  • Treatment vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.0505 (Based on between group comparison using ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate and site and treatment as fixed effects)
PrimaryBilateral Polyp Grade

Polyp grade was determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Bilateral Polyp Grade
units on a scaleTreatmentControl
Baseline4.90 ± 0.9184.39 ± 1.448
Day 904.12 ± 1.1624.00 ± 1.720
Change from baseline-0.76 ± 0.875-0.38 ± 0.998
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.0985Based on ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate, site and treatment as fixed effect
  • Treatment vs Control · ANOVA · p = 0.0490Based on ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate, site and treatment as fixed effect
SecondaryEthmoid Sinus Obstruction

Percentage of the ethmoid sinus volume obstructed by scarring, polyps, or edema on endoscopy, as determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (absence of obstruction) to 100 (complete obstruction). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in ethmoid sinus obstruction.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction
units on a scaleS8 Sinus ImplantControl
Baseline70.59 ± 18.20162.74 ± 25.673
Day 9053.54 ± 20.14057.17 ± 28.516
Change from baseline-17.05 ± 19.361-5.57 ± 18.279
Statistical analysis
  • S8 Sinus Implant vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.0099
SecondaryBilateral Polyp Grade

Polyps were graded by clinical investigators on a scale from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal polyps.

Time frame:
90 days, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Bilateral Polyp Grade
units on a scaleS8 Sinus ImplantControl
Baseline4.68 ± 0.9564.32 ± 1.105
90 days3.65 ± 1.6554.24 ± 1.667
Change from baseline to 90 days-1.04 ± 1.680-0.09 ± 1.203
Month 63.96 ± 1.5874.36 ± 1.708
Change from baseline to 6 months-0.71 ± 1.5270.02 ± 1.158
Statistical analysis
  • S8 Sinus Implant vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.0162 (P-value for change from baseline to 90 days not adjusted for multiplicity)ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate and site and treatment as fixed effects
  • S8 Sinus Implant vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.0175 (P-value for change from baseline to 6 months not adjusted for multiplicity)ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate and site and treatment as fixed effects
SecondaryNasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score

NOSE scale is a validated symptom scoring instrument consisting of 5 questions each scored by patients on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (severe problem), then multiplied by 5 and resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in NOSE score.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
units on a scaleS8 Sinus ImplantControl
Baseline66.79 ± 26.65863.19 ± 23.943
Month 641.83 ± 24.39550.67 ± 25.597
Change from baseline-25.58 ± 28.174-12.22 ± 23.874
Statistical analysis
  • S8 Sinus Implant vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.0209 (P-value not adjusted for multiplicity.)Based on between arm comparison using ANCOVA model with baseline as a covariate and site and treatment as fixed effects
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)

To be indicated for RESS, the following criteria had to be met: * Continued to use topical intranasal steroids daily; * Continued to complain of at least 2 symptoms of chronic sinusitis despite ongoing topical intranasal steroid use * Needed or had received at least 1 course of aggressive steroid therapy or had refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; and * Had endoscopic evidence of persisting ethmoid sinus obstruction (bilateral polyp grade \>=2 on at least one side)

Time frame:
90 days, 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)
ParticipantsS8 Sinus ImplantControl
Baseline5347
Day 902536
Month 63641

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from enrollment though month 6. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)38/53 (71.7%)
Control0/47 (0%)1/47 (2.1%)36/47 (76.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatmentControl
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/531/47
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatmentControl
Chronic SinusititsInfections and infestations11/5314/47
Acute sinusitisInfections and infestations8/5311/47
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations5/532/47
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/533/47
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/533/47
PresyncopeNervous system disorders2/533/47
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/533/47
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/532/47

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TreatmentControlTotal
Mean47.8 ± 12.6151.6 ± 13.1249.6 ± 12.93
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
Female241640
Male293160
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino415
Not Hispanic or Latino494695
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American628
White474491
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
United States5347100
08

Study locations

19 sites
  • California Sinus Centers
    Atherton, California 94027, United States
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Sinus Center of Excellence
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Sacramento Ear, Nose and Throat
    Sacramento, California 95815, United States
  • Colorado Ear, Nose, Throat & Allergy
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • South Florida ENT Associates
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • ENT of Georgia
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Northwestern University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Advanced ENT & Allergy
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • Summit Medical Group
    Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07922, United States
  • Albany ENT & Allergy Services
    Albany, New York 12206, United States
  • ENT and Allergy Associates
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • Piedmont Ear, Nose & Throat Associates
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University-Dept. of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Bethlehem ENT Specialty Physicians Associates
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania, Dept of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Intermountain Ear, Nose & Throat Center
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, United States
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53266, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Han JK, Forwith KD, Smith TL, Kern RC, Brown WJ, Miller SK, Ow RA, Poetker DM, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh J, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: a randomized, controlled, blinded study of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Nov;4(11):861-70. doi: 10.1002/alr.21426. Epub 2014 Sep 29. PubMed 25266981 ↗
  • Forwith KD, Han JK, Stolovitzky JP, Yen DM, Chandra RK, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh JW, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis after sinus surgery: 6-month outcomes from a randomized, controlled, blinded study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jun;6(6):573-81. doi: 10.1002/alr.21741. Epub 2016 Mar 14. PubMed 26992115 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01732536
Lead sponsor
Intersect ENT
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 26, 2012
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Jul 20, 2018
Last update
Jul 20, 2018

Study contacts

Keith D Forwith, MD
principal investigator · Advanced ENT and Allergy
Joseph K Han, MD
principal investigator · Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion