CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01728493PAGODEUpdated Apr 6, 2016

Primary Aldosteronism in General Practice: Organ Damage, Epidemiology and Treatment

An observational study in Primary Aldosteronism and Primary Hyperaldosteronism, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-06.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
700
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent form of secondary hypertension. It is caused by autonomous secretion of aldosterone, encompassing a group of disorders which is for 99% predominated by unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH). Diagnosis of PA is relevant for two reasons:

  1. independent of the level of blood pressure, hypertension due to autonomous aldosterone secretion causes more cardiovascular damage than essential hypertension;
  2. PA requires specific treatment: adrenalectomy in case of APA and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in case of BAH.

Although previously presumed a rare condition (prevalence \<1%), PA is now estimated to affect 6 to 20% of the hypertensive population. Given this high prevalence of PA, as well as the amount of cardiovascular damage and the available specific treatment, the question is raised whether screening of PA should be introduced in Dutch general practice. To answer this important question, several issues with regard to PA need to be elucidated:

  1. International studies report a prevalence of PA in general practice of 6-13%. Prevalence in the Dutch population is still unknown;
  2. Because of underdiagnosis of PA and long delay in diagnosis of PA after recognition of hypertension (mean eight years), data on characteristics of early diagnosed PA are lacking. Proof of early cardiovascular damage would strengthen the case of screening for PA and needs to be studied;
  3. Consequently, the diagnostic delay has lead to lack of data on optimal treatment in early PA. In the current guideline (NHG-guideline 'Cardiovascular risk management') a regimen of antihypertensive drugs is advised, and only if hypertension is refractory for >6 months patients are referred. It is unknown if hypertension is resistant to therapy in the initial phase of PA. If not, this would also argue for early biochemical screening for PA, because even if blood pressure is controlled, the detrimental effect of aldosterone itself will go on unopposed. It is therefore required to study the response to antihypertensive drugs (not MRA) in these patients.
Read the detailed description

Rationale: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent form of secondary hypertension. It is caused by autonomous secretion of aldosterone, encompassing a group of disorders which is for more than 99% predominated by unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH). Diagnosis of PA is relevant for two reasons: 1) independent of the level of blood pressure, hypertension due to autonomous aldosterone secretion causes more cardiovascular damage than essential hypertension; 2) PA requires specific treatment: adrenalectomy in case of APA and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in case of BAH.

Although previously presumed a rare condition (prevalence \<1%), PA is now estimated to affect 6 to 20% of the hypertensive population. Given this high prevalence of PA, as well as the amount of cardiovascular damage and the available specific treatment, the question has been raised whether screening of PA should be introduced in Dutch general practice. To answer this important question, several issues with regard to PA need to be elucidated:

  1. International studies report a prevalence of PA in general practice of 6-13%. Prevalence in the Dutch population is still unknown;
  2. Up to now, the laboratory test for screening for PA, the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR), is primarily used in secondary care. The relation between the ARR and outcomes in primary care is unknown;
  3. Because of underdiagnosis of PA and long delay in diagnosis of PA after recognition of hypertension (mean eight years), data on characteristics of early diagnosed PA are lacking. Indications of early cardiovascular damage would strengthen the case of screening for PA and needs to be studied.
02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Aldosteronism
  • Primary Hyperaldosteronism

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prevalence
  • Primary aldosteronism
  • Organ damage
  • Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
03

In context

Hyperaldosteronism

193 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperaldosteronism; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 700 is above the median of 200 across 98 observational studies indexed under Hyperaldosteronism.

Browse Hyperaldosteronism studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in general practice (primary care).

Inclusion criteria

Part 1:

  1. Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients (according to the NHG-guideline 'Cardiovascular risk management');
  2. 18 years or older;
  3. No use of antihypertensive medication.

Part 2:

  1. Patients with increased aldosterone/renin ratio;
  2. Positive sodium loading test;
  3. Written informed consent.

Part 2 + 3:

  1. Patients with normal aldosterone/renin ratio;
  2. Normal ARR;
  3. Written informed consent.

Part 3:

  1. Patients with increased aldosterone/renin ratio;
  2. Positive sodium loading test;
  3. Normokalemic;
  4. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of antihypertensive medication;
  2. Heart failure class II, III or IV (according to the New York Heart Association);
  3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
700 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Part 1

    - newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in general practice

  • Part 2:

    * newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism * newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with essential hypertension

  • Part 3:

    * newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with normokalemic primary aldosteronism * newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with essential hypertension

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PAGODE part 1: prevalence

    Prevalence of primary aldosteronism in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in Dutch general practice.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. PAGODE part 2: organ damage

    Difference in cardiorenovascular damage in patients with versus without primary aldosteronism, based on a composite of the following parameters: 1. Left ventricular mass index in g/m2; 2. Intima-media thickness of carotid artery in mm; 3. Pulse wave velocity in m/s; 4. Central aortic blood pressure in mmHg; 5. Flow-mediated dilation in %; 6. Albuminuria in mg albumin per mmol creatinin.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. PAGODE part 3: blood pressure regulation

    Difference in reduction of daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in patients with normokalemic primary aldosteronism versus patients with essential hypertension in a standardized treatment regimen during conventional antihypertensive therapy.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. PAGODE part 2: organ damage

    To observe differences between newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with versus without primary aldosteronism in: 1. Serum potassium; 2. Low density lipoprotein; 3. Total cholesterol to high density lipoprotein ratio.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. PAGODE part 3: blood pressure regulation

    To observe differences between newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with versus without primary aldosteronism in: 1. Reduction of daytime systolic ABPM in patients with primary aldosteronism versus patients with essential hypertension in a standardized treatment regimen during spironolactone (or eplerenone); 2. Serum potassium response using conventional antihypertensive medication; 3. Adverse effects using conventional antihypertensive medication; 4. Serum potassium response using spironolactone (or eplerenone); 5. Adverse effects using spironolactone (or eplerenone).

    Time frame: 4 months

Other outcomes

  1. PAGODE part 2: organ damage

    To observe differences between newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with versus without primary aldosteronism in: 1. Serum sodium; 2. Serum glucose; 3. Diastolic blood pressure.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. PAGODE part 3: blood pressure regulation

    To observe differences between newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with versus without primary aldosteronism in: 1. Reduction in 24 hour ABPM using conventional antihypertensive medication; 2. Reduction in 24 hour ABPM using mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Radboud university medical center
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6500 HB, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01728493
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Responsible party
JDeinum (Dr J Deinum, Radboud University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 19, 2012
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Apr 6, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion