CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01716572Updated Oct 8, 2015

Erythromycin Versus Gastric Lavage to Improve Quality of Endoscopy in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

A Phase 3 interventional study of Erythromycin and gastric lavage in Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Hematemesis, sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-08.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2015), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
122
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The researchers will investigate whether erythromycin infusion is better than gastric lavage prior to emergency endoscopy to improve the quality of examination in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Read the detailed description

The researchers will investigate whether erythromycin infusion is better than gastric lavage prior to emergency endoscopy to improve the quality of examination in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

One hundred and twenty-two patients admitted within 12 hours after hematemesis will be randomly assigned to receive erythromycin infusion or gastric lavage by nasogastric tube prior to emergency endoscopy. The endoscopic procedures will be recorded on Digital Video Disc (DVD). Two endoscopists blinded to the cleansing strategy will assess the quality of examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract by using scales designed by Frossard and Avgerinos .

Secondary endpoints will be the need for a second-look endoscopy, the mean number of blood units transfused, the need of surgery or arteriography, and the mean duration of hospitalization

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • Hematemesis

Keywords

  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Endoscopy
  • Erythromycin
  • Gastric lavage
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 122 is above the median of 87 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Browse Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • recent hematemesis (\<12 hours)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • macrolides allergy
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • treatment with terfenadine, astemizole or cyclosporine
  • prior gastrectomy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
122 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    gastric lavage

    gastric lavage by nasogastric tube with 1 liter saline before the endoscopy

    Procedure: gastric lavage

  • Active comparator
    erythromycin

    administration of 250mgr of erythromycin before the endoscopy

    Drug: Erythromycin

Interventions

  • DrugErythromycin

    Intravenous 250 mg of erythromycin, single-dose, 30 minutes before the endoscopy

    Also known as: Pantomicina Intravenosa

  • Proceduregastric lavage

    gastric lavage by nasogastric tube with 1 liter of saline before the endoscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual quality of endoscopy

    To assess the visual quality of endoscopy the investigators will use the Avgerinos' score modified by Frossard (Gastroenterology 2002;123:17-23). An score from 0 to 2(0 worst vision, where \< 25% of the surface was visible. 1, 25-75% visible and 2 \>75% visible) was derived from analysis of each area (fundus, body, antrum and bulbus). A score of 6 or greater is considered as a clear stomach, and a score of 5 or lower was considered as a full stomach.

    Time frame: The endoscopy will be recorded and subsequently it will be evaluated by two endoscopists unaware of the cleaning strategy. The recording's evaluation will be made within the first 30 days after endoscopy

Secondary outcomes

  1. need for a second-look endoscopy

    To assess the need of a second-look endoscopy due to a full stomach during the first endoscopy or due to rebleeding

    Time frame: within the first 30 days after endoscopy

  2. need of blood transfusion

    Time frame: within 30 days after endoscopy

  3. number of adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability

    Time frame: within the first 30 days after endoscopy

  4. length of hospitalisation

    Time frame: within the first 30 days after endoscopy

  5. length of endoscopic procedure

    Time frame: within the first 30 days after endoscopy

  6. need for arteriography or surgery

    Time frame: within the first 30 days after endoscopy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08907, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Frossard JL, Spahr L, Queneau PE, Giostra E, Burckhardt B, Ory G, De Saussure P, Armenian B, De Peyer R, Hadengue A. Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology. 2002 Jul;123(1):17-23. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34230. Erratum In: Gastroenterology 2002 Dec;123(6):2162. PubMed 12105828 ↗
  • Coffin B, Pocard M, Panis Y, Riche F, Laine MJ, Bitoun A, Lemann M, Bouhnik Y, Valleur P; Groupe des endoscopistes de garde a l'AP-HP. Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):174-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70174-0. PubMed 12145593 ↗
  • Carbonell N, Pauwels A, Serfaty L, Boelle PY, Becquemont L, Poupon R. Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1211-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00582.x. PubMed 16771939 ↗
  • Pateron D, Vicaut E, Debuc E, Sahraoui K, Carbonell N, Bobbia X, Thabut D, Adnet F, Nahon P, Amathieu R, Aout M, Javaud N, Ray P, Trinchet JC; HDUPE Collaborative Study Group. Erythromycin infusion or gastric lavage for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;57(6):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 17. PubMed 21333385 ↗
  • Barkun AN, Bardou M, Martel M, Gralnek IM, Sung JJ. Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011. PubMed 20970794 ↗
  • Winstead NS, Wilcox CM. Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 15;26(10):1371-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03516.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10. PubMed 17848180 ↗
  • Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, Sinclair P; International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):101-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009. PubMed 20083829 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01716572
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Collaborators
Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad
Responsible party
Dr Antonio Soriano Izquierdo (Physician Doctor, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2015
Completion
Dec 2015 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2015

Study contacts

Antonio Soriano, M D, Ph D
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion