CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01713868SMARTUpdated Jan 11, 2019Results posted

Social Media And Risk-reduction Training for Infant Care Practices (SMART)

An interventional study of Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding Nursery Education in Risk Reduction, sponsored by University of Virginia. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-11.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this proposal is to address serious and ongoing challenges related to adherence to public health recommendations known to reduce the risk of SIDS. Adherence has reached a plateau at an unacceptably low level both in the overall US population and especially in Black infants leading to a halt in the decline in infant mortality and a widening in the racial disparity in infant mortality. The current proposal is a collaborative effort that will capitalize on the extensive experience of the investigators in studying barriers to adherence to safe sleep practices to develop two complementary, culturally competent, intervention strategies and to test the effectiveness of each strategy as well as both strategies in combination. Innovative aspects of the Social Media and Risk-reduction Training of Infant Care Practices (SMART) study include its: 1) unique collaboration of leaders in the field; 2) leveraging of the currently operational infant care practices study infrastructure and hospitals; 3) use of two complementary interventions with the potential for synergistic impact; 4) use of social marketing strategies;5) use of mobile technology (mHealth) to deliver messages; and 6) collaboration with community resources and expertise. The SMART study will have four arms in which 16 hospitals are randomly assigned to one of the following study groups: 1) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging; 2) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; 3) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; 4) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging. A total of 1600 mothers will be recruited (100/hospital), with 400 in each study group. The primary aim is to assess the effectiveness of the interventions aimed at promoting safe sleep practices compared with the breastfeeding control interventions. The secondary aim is to assess potential mediating factors that may explain the intervention effects on infant care practices and that may inform areas for future improved intervention approaches. With the successful completion of the SMART study, effectiveness data will have been provided for two interventions to improve adherence to safe sleep practices that are practical to disseminate nationally in multiple diverse settings.

Read the detailed description

FOA PAR-11-242 seeks research that will improve the design, implementation, and effectiveness of interventions to prevent Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and unintentional injury-related infant deaths associated with the sleep environment. The SMART (Social Media and Risk Reduction Training) Infant Care Practices proposal is a collaborative effort among researchers who collectively have generated much of the data on infant care practices that underlie the need for this FOA, and who have access to an already existing and operational infrastructure that permits performance of a large randomized clinical trial to study preventative interventions. This infrastructure was created for the NICHD-funded SAFE Infant Care Practices study, for which mothers are being recruited in 2011, 2012, and 2013 at a nationally-representative group of birth hospitals, with completion of infant care practice surveys at 2-5 months after birth. These hospitals, which will complete their participation in SAFE during 2013, are geographically and culturally diverse, will have had 3 years of baseline infant care practice data collected, and have a proven track record of successful recruitment. We will use our collective extensive experience studying barriers to adherence to safe sleep practices to develop two complementary, culturally competent intervention strategies and to test the effectiveness of each strategy, as well as both strategies in combination. Both of the proposed intervention strategies, described below, were selected largely because they can be used in diverse populations and offer the potential to be rapidly disseminated nationwide.

Nursery Education: A nursery-based training program will be modeled after our successful pilot study and informed by our collective research on barriers to adopting safe sleep practices. We will use social marketing strategies to capture the attention of nursing staff and empower them to improve safe sleep practice modeling and messaging received by mothers and extended families during the post-partum hospital stay.

mHealth: We will use an innovative approach, using mobile messaging, that applies expertise in social marketing to provide multiple short culturally competent videos delivered via email from the end of the post-partum hospital stay through 2 months of age. This strategy will leverage the internet as a powerful tool to access health information, and mobile devices (e.g., cell phones), which have made internet access possible for many, particularly those who are younger, minority, and from lower socioeconomic and educational backgrounds. Using technology to deliver health-related information is likely to be a well-accepted and effective strategy, particularly among minority and low-income populations. Indeed, studies demonstrate that email may be an effective, inexpensive, and time-efficient strategy to transmit health information.

For each of the safe sleep practice interventions (Nursery Education and mHealth), we will develop control interventions in which the Nursery Education or mHealth approach is used to promote breastfeeding. We have chosen breastfeeding as the control intervention because it 1) is not expected to impact endpoints critical to the assessment of the safe sleep practice intervention, and 2) provides health promoting messages to control mothers.

In the SMART study, we propose a 4-arm RCT in which 16 hospitals completing participation in the SAFE study are randomly assigned to one of the following groups (with Safe Sleep Intervention and/or Breastfeeding Control): 1) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging; 2) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; 3) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and 4) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging. We are uniquely positioned to design, implement and test the effectiveness of these interventions in a methodologically rigorous way and propose the following specific aims: Primary Aim: To assess the effectiveness of the interventions aimed at promoting safe sleep practices compared with the breastfeeding controls.

Hypothesis:For each recommended safe sleep practice (supine sleep position, not bed sharing, pacifier use, avoiding use of soft bedding), when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging.

Secondary Aim: Assess potential mediating factors that may explain the intervention effects on infant care practices and that may inform areas for future improved intervention approaches.

Hypothesis: Changes in variables within each of the domains of the Theory of Planned Behavior (Attitudes/Beliefs, Social Norms, Perceived Control) will be mediators of the effectiveness of safe sleep interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Risk Reduction

Keywords

  • Breastfeeding
  • Safe Sleep
  • Messaging
  • Social Media
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • mothers must live in the US, deliver a healthy infant in one of the study hospitals, plan to take her baby home with her, and be able to receive emails.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mothers who are not English speaking, whose infant is deceased, those not having custody of the infant, and those whose infants require hospitalization for more than 1 week, or have an ongoing medical problem requiring subspecialty care and mothers who are unable to receive email messages.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
1,600 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth

    Participants will receive Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding Mobile Health messaging

    Behavioral: Safe Sleep Nursery Education · Behavioral: Breastfeeding Mobile Health Messaging

  • Other
    Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth

    Participants will receive the Breastfeeding Nursery Education and the Safe Sleep Mobile Health messaging

    Behavioral: Breastfeeding Nursery Education · Behavioral: Safe Sleep Mobile Health Messaging

  • Other
    Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth

    Participants will receive Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep Mobile Health messaging

    Behavioral: Safe Sleep Nursery Education · Behavioral: Safe Sleep Mobile Health Messaging

  • Other
    Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth

    Participants will receive Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Breastfeeding Mobile Health messaging

    Behavioral: Breastfeeding Nursery Education · Behavioral: Breastfeeding Mobile Health Messaging

Interventions

  • BehavioralSafe Sleep Nursery Education

    Nursery-based program for safe sleep

  • BehavioralBreastfeeding Nursery Education

    Nursery-based program to promote breastfeeding

  • BehavioralBreastfeeding Mobile Health Messaging

    Mobile messaging to provide multiple short culturally competent videos to promote breastfeeding delivered via email.

  • BehavioralSafe Sleep Mobile Health Messaging

    Mobile messaging to provide multiple short culturally competent videos to promote safe sleep practices delivered via email.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence With Recommended Supine Sleep Position

    Hypothesis:For supine sleep position, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Adherence With Recommended Roomsharing Without Bed Sharing

    Hypothesis: For roomsharing without bed sharing, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Adherence With Recommended Pacifier Use

    Hypothesis: For pacifier use, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Adherence With Recommended Avoiding Use of Soft Bedding

    Hypothesis: For each recommended avoidance of soft bedding use, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Supine Sleep

    Questions assessing attitudes toward sleep position included the mothers' ratings regarding if she believed that each infant sleep position (back, side, stomach) made the baby healthy, safer, more comfortable, and kept the baby from choking. Positive attitudes were defined as having positive attitudes toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive attitudes toward other behaviors (e.g., having positive attitudes towards both supine and side sleep would lead to a categorization of not having positive attitudes towards supine sleep only).

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.

    Questions assessing attitudes toward sleep location (bedsharing, roomsharing without bedsharing) assessed whether the location was pleasant for the baby and/or mother, safer for the baby, more comfortable for the baby and/or mother, and kept the baby from choking. Positive attitudes were defined as having positive attitudes toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive attitudes toward other behaviors (e.g., having positive attitudes towards both bedsharing and not bedsharing would lead to a categorization of not having positive attitudes towards bedsharing only).

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re Supine Sleep

    Social norms were assessed by asking if the people most important to the mother thought that the baby should sleep in each position or location. Positive social norms were defined as having positive norms toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive norms toward other behaviors.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re: Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.

    Social norms were assessed by asking if the people most important to the mother thought that the baby should sleep in each position or location. Positive social norms were defined as having positive norms toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive norms toward other behaviors

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 3, 2019
Limitations and caveats
There was a 21% loss to follow-up, not generalizable to non-English-speaking populations, not powered to assess adverse events, did not measure clinical outcomes (i.e., rates of sudden unexpected infant death), and the results were self-reported

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSafe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth
Started400400400400
Completed303335320305
Not completed97658095

Outcome measures

PrimaryAdherence With Recommended Supine Sleep Position

Hypothesis:For supine sleep position, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence With Recommended Supine Sleep Position
ParticipantsSafe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth
Usual supine sleep position230294294243
Usual nonsupine position71392560
Statistical analysis
  • Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth vs Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.03 (Adjusted education effect p=0.34. Adjusted mHealth effect p\<0.001. Test for interaction p=0.01. Adjusted education only effect p=0.74. Adjusted mHealth only effect p=0.02. Adjusted mHealth and education effect: p=0.03)
PrimaryAdherence With Recommended Roomsharing Without Bed Sharing

Hypothesis: For roomsharing without bed sharing, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence With Recommended Roomsharing Without Bed Sharing
ParticipantsSafe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth
Roomsharing without bedsharing218262269205
Not roomsharing without bedsharing75664486
Statistical analysis
  • Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth vs Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 (Adjusted education effect: p=0.22. Adjusted mHealth effect p\<0.001. Test for interaction p=0.08.)
PrimaryAdherence With Recommended Pacifier Use

Hypothesis: For pacifier use, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence With Recommended Pacifier Use
ParticipantsSafe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth
Usual pacifier use193226240174
Usual no pacifier use9710075117
Statistical analysis
  • Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth vs Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 (Adjusted education effect p=0.07. Adjusted mHealth effect p\<0.001. Test for interaction p=0.54)
PrimaryAdherence With Recommended Avoiding Use of Soft Bedding

Hypothesis: For each recommended avoidance of soft bedding use, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence With Recommended Avoiding Use of Soft Bedding
ParticipantsSafe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth
No soft bedding use204259262202
Soft bedding use96745897
Statistical analysis
  • Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth vs Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth vs Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 (Adjusted education effect p=0.33. Adjusted mHealth effect p\<0.001. Test for interaction p=0.29.)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Supine Sleep

Questions assessing attitudes toward sleep position included the mothers' ratings regarding if she believed that each infant sleep position (back, side, stomach) made the baby healthy, safer, more comfortable, and kept the baby from choking. Positive attitudes were defined as having positive attitudes toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive attitudes toward other behaviors (e.g., having positive attitudes towards both supine and side sleep would lead to a categorization of not having positive attitudes towards supine sleep only).

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Supine Sleep
ParticipantsControlmHealth Safe Sleep
# reporting positive attitudes re supine sleep313491
# reporting nonpositive attitudes re supine sleep295164
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs mHealth Safe Sleep · Difference in proportions: 0.16
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.

Questions assessing attitudes toward sleep location (bedsharing, roomsharing without bedsharing) assessed whether the location was pleasant for the baby and/or mother, safer for the baby, more comfortable for the baby and/or mother, and kept the baby from choking. Positive attitudes were defined as having positive attitudes toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive attitudes toward other behaviors (e.g., having positive attitudes towards both bedsharing and not bedsharing would lead to a categorization of not having positive attitudes towards bedsharing only).

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.
ParticipantsControlmHealth Safe Sleep
Positive attitude re: roomsharing w/o bedsharing306442
Nonpositive attitude re roomsharing w/o bedsharing302213
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs mHealth Safe Sleep · Difference in proportions: 0.14
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re Supine Sleep

Social norms were assessed by asking if the people most important to the mother thought that the baby should sleep in each position or location. Positive social norms were defined as having positive norms toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive norms toward other behaviors.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re Supine Sleep
ParticipantsControlmHealth Safe Sleep
Positive social norms re supine sleep332466
Nonpositive social norms re supine sleep276189
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs mHealth Safe Sleep · Difference in proportions: 0.14
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re: Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.

Social norms were assessed by asking if the people most important to the mother thought that the baby should sleep in each position or location. Positive social norms were defined as having positive norms toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive norms toward other behaviors

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re: Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.
ParticipantsControlmHealth Safe Sleep
Positive social norms re roomsharing w/o bedsharin297350
Nonpositive norms re roomsharing w/o bedsharing311305
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs mHealth Safe Sleep · Difference in proportions: 0.15

Adverse events

Collected over 24 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)
Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)
Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)
Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)0/400 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
<=18 years32144221109
Between 18 and 65 years3683863583791491
>=65 years00000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
Mean27.0 ± 5.929.3 ± 5.827.1 ± 5.927.6 ± 5.727.9 ± 5.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
Female3033353203051263
Male00000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
Hispanic or Latino128121144127520
Not Hispanic or Latino2722792562731080
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian122662064
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American17310195133502
White112205187141645
More than one race20117846
Unknown or Not Reported835710598343
Maternal educational level
Maternal educational level(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
Less than high school3611311088
High school or GED84637788312
Some college102114118104438
College or more8014792101420
Unknown10225
Household income
Household income(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
Less than $20,00049305547181
$20,000-49.99959625662239
$50,000 or more811759188435
Unknown11468118108408
Maternal marital status
Maternal marital status(Participants)Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealthBreastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthSafe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealthBreastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealthTotal
Married127203147163640
Never married158111151132552
Divorced, separated, or widowed142014856
Unknown418215
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Moon RY, Corwin MJ, Kerr S, Heeren T, Colson E, Kellams A, Geller NL, Drake E, Tanabe K, Hauck FR. Mediators of Improved Adherence to Infant Safe Sleep Using a Mobile Health Intervention. Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5):e20182799. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2799. PubMed 31015374 ↗
  • Moon RY, Hauck FR, Colson ER, Kellams AL, Geller NL, Heeren T, Kerr SM, Drake EE, Tanabe K, McClain M, Corwin MJ. The Effect of Nursing Quality Improvement and Mobile Health Interventions on Infant Sleep Practices: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jul 25;318(4):351-359. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8982. PubMed 28742913 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01713868
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Collaborators
Yale University, Boston University
Responsible party
Rachel Moon, MD (Rachel Moon, M.D., University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 25, 2012
Start date
Mar 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2017
Results posted
Jan 3, 2019
Last update
Jan 11, 2019

Study contacts

Michael Corwin, MD
principal investigator · Boston University
Eve R Colson, M.D.
principal investigator · Yale University
Fern R Hauck, M.D., M.S.
principal investigator · University of Virginia
Rachel Moon, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion