CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01707121Updated Nov 20, 2015

The Impact of Physical Activity on the Outcome of Surgery

An observational study in Physical Activity, Breast Neoplasm and Colorectal Neoplasm, sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-20.

Sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
450
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Over the last decades different life style factors have been established as risk factors for various diseases. The obesity pandemic displays a good example of a disease where great effort is undertaken to characterize risk factors associated with obesity (1). Smoking is another life style risk factor established since several decades, and where primary prevention has been increasingly successful (2, 3). Cardiovascular epidemiologic research at the University of Gothenburg recognized PA as a factor of importance early on and thus included PA related questions in the work up of studies with large cohorts (4-6). A 4-level scale was introduced in the late 1960:s by Saltin and Grimby (7) and has been used extensively since then. With this background it is of interest to record physical activity one year and one month prior to certain types of elective surgery and to study the relationship of PA to surgical complications and recovery is of interest.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a higher physical activity prior to a surgical procedure reduces hospital stay, sick leave and the complication rate.

A secondary aim is to investigate the effect of preoperative physical activity on the rate of resumption of QoL and normal physical function.

Read the detailed description

Physical activity (PA) has been in focus over the last two decades as a life style factor of importance. A review summarizing nearly 170 studies states that the scientific evidence for the association between lack of physical activity and cancer is convincing regarding breast and colon cancer and probable for prostate cancer and possible for lung and endometrial cancer (8). Regarding postoperative rehabilitation the benefits from preoperative physical exercise together with a postoperative early rehabilitation schedule has been reported for spinal surgery (9). In colorectal surgery the benefits of enhanced recovery programs have been clearly demonstrated (10). The impact of preoperative prehabilitation has been evaluated and seems beneficial (11, 12), however most studies have not used clinically important outcome measures such as complications or postoperative morbidity. The evidence for prehabilitation as a measure to reduce postoperative morbidity is scarce (12). To evaluate the recovery after a surgical procedure in a broader sense is difficult. Several scales have been tried to assess recovery (13-16).

The simple instrument for self-reported PA introduced by Saltin and Grimby has been shown to discriminate between sedentary and active counterparts regarding maximum oxygen uptake (17) and has been validated against biological measures (18). Indeed, studies have indicated that such single self-reported approximation of the level of PA, may predict risk for morbidity and cardiovascular as well as total mortality (19-21). The self-assessed PA-level concurs well with the actual physical fitness of the individual (22-24). This is also important, since cardiorespiratory fitness may also predict cardiovascular risk and mortality (25).

There are also studies indicating that other life-style factors such as alcohol consumption has a negative impact on outcome after surgery as well as outcome after health-care associated infections (26, 27). To screen for excessive alcohol consumption the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT) test has been used. Several recent studies have indicated that a shorter survey with the top three questions in the AUDIT questionnaire (AUDIT-C) is sufficient to provide information on alcohol use (28, 29).

Smoking is also a life-style factor that affects surgical outcome (30). It has been shown to increase the risk for complications and studies indicate that smoking cessation prior to the surgical procedure to reduce the risk for complications (31). Self-reported assessment of smoking seems to be accurate and reflect the actual nicotine use of the individual (32).

Length of hospital stay is of importance both to patients and the society. A surgical procedure that shortens hospital stay may be cost-effective even in cases with higher operation room costs (33). It is also of importance to consider time to work/sick leave; a cost for patients and society that can affect the cost analysis of a surgical procedure (34).

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a higher physical activity prior to a surgical procedure reduces hospital stay, sick leave and the complication rate.

A secondary aim is to investigate the effect of preoperative physical activity on the rate of resumption of QoL and normal physical function.

In order to explore the importance of PA for the outcome after a surgical procedure due to gallbladder disease, breast cancer and colorectal cancer we will ask all patients operated for any of the three above mentioned conditions to answer a short questionnaire (Appendix I) including the Saltin and Grimby (7) questions to study of the effects of the level of PA immediately before surgical operations. The patients will be asked to estimate their physical activity four weeks prior to the surgical procedure.

  1. Mostly sedentary
  2. Light PA (such as gardening or walking or bicycling to work) at least two hours a week
  3. Moderate PA such as aerobics, dancing, swimming, playing football or heavy gardening) at least two hours a week
  4. Vigorous PA (high intensity) at least five hours daily several times a week.

They will also be asked to report weight, length, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic situation, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and BMI as well as certain questions with relation to Quality of Life and their postoperative recovery (Appendix I). The questions are to some extent validated through previous research (28, 29, 32, 47, 48) but some questions are newly constructed. The new questions have been constructed by an expert panel consisting of colorectal and general surgeons, cardiologist and specialized nurses. The domains chosen have been related to previous research regarding recovery (42). The questionnaire has been face-to face validated by patients with gall bladder surgery planned or a previous cholecystectomy performed, patients with breast cancer both prior and after surgery and colorectal cancer patients prior and after surgery using the same validation methods previously described for prostate cancer (48).

All patients will be contacted by telephone and a subsequently receive a mailed questionnaire (similar to the pre-operative questionnaire) (Appendix II) regarding their self-assessed QoL post-operatively and postoperative recovery, the timing of this will be related to the estimated time for recovery as follows:

  • 3 weeks after gallbladder surgery
  • 3 and 6 weeks after surgery for breast cancer
  • 3 and 6 weeks after surgery for colorectal cancer
02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity
  • Breast Neoplasm
  • Colorectal Neoplasm
  • Gall Stones

Keywords

  • morbidity
  • sick-leave
  • hospital stay
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 450 is above the median of 204 across 1,683 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sahlgrenska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 259 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients planned for a surgical procedure with a planned hospital stay of at least 1 day.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients at including hospitals scheduled for any of the following procedures will be asked to participate: cholecystectomy, breast cancer surgery, colorectal cancer surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
450 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Surgical patients

    Patients with planned surgery for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and gall bladder disease

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of sick-leave/time to work

    for breast cancer and gallbladder surgery

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Length of hospital stay

    for colorectal surgery

    Time frame: 6 weekw

Secondary outcomes

  1. length of sick leave/time to work

    for colon and rectal cancer: length of sick leave/time to work

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. length of hospital stay

    cholecystectomy and breast cancer: length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Recovery

    Recovery measured as resumption of Quality of Life and return to normal function after surgery according to the patient's self-reported assessment in the postoperative questionnaire and measured as return to pre-operative levels.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Health economic analysis

    Health economic analysis of resource consumption

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra
    Göteborg, 416 85, Sweden
  • Skövde Kärnsjukhus
    Skövde, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nilsson H, Angeras U, Bock D, Borjesson M, Onerup A, Fagevik Olsen M, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E, Angenete E. Is preoperative physical activity related to post-surgery recovery? A cohort study of patients with breast cancer. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 14;6(1):e007997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007997. PubMed 26769776 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01707121
Lead sponsor
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Responsible party
Eva Angenete (Consultant surgeon, M.D., Ph.D., Sahlgrenska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2012
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Last update
Nov 20, 2015

Study contacts

Eva Angenete, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · SSORG, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion