ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01706913Updated Jan 16, 2026

Study Assessing Impact of Dermatology Consultation for Patients Admitted With Cellulitis

An interventional study of Dermatology consult in Cellulitis, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-16.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, controlled study to compare patients evaluated and managed by internal medicine hospitalists alone versus patients who are additionally evaluated by a dermatologist when they are admitted to the hospital, aiming to demonstrate that hospital admissions for cellulitis that involve early dermatology consultation will reduce hospital length of stay, readmission rates, prevalence of pseudocellulitis, cost, and antibiotic usage. The hypothesis of this study is that obtaining inpatient dermatology consultations, within 24 hours of a patient being admitted to the hospital for cellulitis, will reduce the length of stay, readmission rate, cost, and antibiotic usage of the patient"s admission as well as properly evaluate and diagnose patients with pseudocellulitis. The primary objective will be to measure the difference in the length of stay for patients who are randomized to a dermatology consultation within 24 hours of hospital admission (active arm) versus being managed by an internal medicine hospitalist alone, as is the standard of care (control arm). The length of stay for each arm will be assessed once the study has been completed. The secondary endpoint will be to measure readmission rates for cellulitis after patients are discharged from the hospital. An additional endpoint will be to determine if antibiotic usage differs between patients randomized to a dermatology consultation and those not. Exploratory analyses will assess the percentage of patients with a concomitant known predisposing factor for recurrent cellulitis such as lymphedema, leg ulceration, tinea pedis, or onychomycosis, as well as the association of fever >100.5 F and a history of a prior episode of cellulitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cellulitis

160 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulitis; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 246 is above the median of 157 across 124 interventional studies indexed under Cellulitis.

Browse Cellulitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to understand and sign
  • Able to complete study and comply with study procedures
  • Presumed clinical diagnosis of cellulitis by medicine team

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a known postoperative site infection or abscess
  • Have a human/animal bite
  • Have known osteomyelitis
  • Have a hardware/line infection
  • Are under the age of 18
  • Have a history of transplantation less than six months after initial transplant and/or if they have had an episode of acute rejection in the last 90 days
  • Known use of antithymocyte globulin or campath in the last 6 months or more than 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than 30 days -
  • Are a known prisoner.
  • Are decisionally-impaired.
  • Have abnormal vital signs defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20, or temperature > 100.5 F.
  • Are known to be pregnant.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
246 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    No consult

    Those who are in the control group will follow internal medicine hospitalist recommendations alone which will include when and what type of post-discharge follow-up appointments the patient will have. We would like to emphasize that as part of the standard of care, patients in the control arm may still receive a dermatology consult if it is deemed necessary and/or requested. We will not prevent patients or the patient's team of caregivers from requesting a dermatology consultation during the course of hospitalization. A follow-up phone call will be performed two weeks after discharge for patients in the control group in order to confirm the patient's outcome. There will also be a medical record review one month after the patient's initial discharge from the hospital to assess for readmission

  • Active comparator
    Dermatology Consult

    The patients randomized to the treatment group will obtain a dermatology evaluation within 24 hours of being admitted to MGH for their cellulitis. The skin and lymph node exam performed by the dermatologist on patients in the treatment group will be documented in the LMR for the subjects' medical records. Patients who are readmitted for cellulitis within one month of being discharged from the hospital will be considered treatment failures. Patients in the treatment group will have a follow-up visit in dermatology clinic within two weeks after being discharged. There will also be a medical record review performed one month after the patient's initial discharge from the hospital to assess for readmission.

    Other: Dermatology consult

Interventions

  • OtherDermatology consult
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Antibiotic usage

    We will be measuring the difference between antibiotic usage in patients in the control group as compared with the treatment group

    Time frame: 2 weeks after discharge from hospital stay

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    We will be comparing the length of admission between the control group and the treatment group to assess whether a dermatology consult has any impact on the length of a patient's hospital stay.

    Time frame: Will be measured at day of patient discharge

Other outcomes

  1. Readmission rate

    We will be measuring the readmission rate among patients in both groups in order to discover whether a dermatology consult has an impact on readmission rates among patients with cellultis.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after patient discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ko LN, Garza-Mayers AC, St John J, Strazzula L, Vedak P, Shah R, Dobry AS, Rao SR, Milne LW, Parry BA, Kroshinsky D. Effect of Dermatology Consultation on Outcomes for Patients With Presumed Cellulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 May 1;154(5):529-536. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.6196. PubMed 29453872 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01706913
Collaborators
Dermatology Foundation
Responsible party
Daniela Kroshinsky (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2018
Completion
Dec 31, 2018
Last update
Jan 16, 2026

Study contacts

Daniela Kroshinsky, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion