CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01695720VSI-001Updated May 31, 2013

Clinical Efficacy Study Comparing VisionScope Imaging (VSI) to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Injuries of the Knee

An interventional study of VisionScope Imaging (VSI) Exam in Meniscus Tears, Loose Bodies and Articular Osteoarthritis, sponsored by VisionScope Technologies. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-05-31.

Sponsored by VisionScope Technologies · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to accumulate efficacy data on VisionScope Imaging (VSI) for pre-operative diagnosis of certain knee injuries (meniscal and articular cartilage injuries). The study will compare VSI's accuracy to MRI's in diagnosing the same injuries.

The hypothesis is the VisionScope Imaging system will be able to provide direct visualization and diagnostic images of inside the joint capsule space without fluid distention in the knee. This study will provide valuable feedback on the ability of the VisionScope system to provide physicians with the information they need to make a definitive diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to accumulate efficacy data on the VisionScope Imaging System (VSI) for pre-operative diagnoses when it is used to provide illumination and visualization of articular cavities. The study will analyze the VisionScope system's accuracy compared to MRI in diagnosing and confirming meniscus tears, chondral defects, loose bodies, minor arthritis, and/or any articular or capsular trauma.

The hypothesis of the study is that the VisionScope System will be able to obtain direct visualization and diagnostic images of the intercapsular space without fluid distention in the knee. This study will provide feedback on the ability of the VisionScope system to potentially eliminate the need for MRI scans. Additionally, a cost-analysis comparison between the use of VSI vs. MRI for the diagnosis of orthopaedic knee injuries will be conducted. Finally, the study will help develop an algorithm of potential use for the VSI system in the management of knee pathologies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meniscus Tears
  • Loose Bodies
  • Articular Osteoarthritis
  • Articular or Capsular Trauma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Knee Injuries
  • Meniscus Injuries
  • Articular Cartilage Injuries
  • Orthopaedic Diagnostic
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,397 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 581 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with VisionScope Technologies as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Suspected meniscal injuries to the knee
  • Suspected articular cartilage injuries to the knee

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute traumatic hemarthroses and/or concomitant ligament injury
  • Active systemic infection
  • Allergy to silicone or any medication used during the procedure
  • Enrollment in another pharmacological or medical device study
  • Institutionalized persons, prisoners and persons with decisional incapacity
  • Investigator's own students and employees
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VisionScope Imaging (VSI) Exam

    A VisionScope Imaging (VSI) Exam is diagnostic arthroscopic procedure. Through a natural or surgical opening, an endoscope is inserted through a cannula to illuminate and visualize the interior cavity of a joint.

    Procedure: VisionScope Imaging (VSI) Exam

Interventions

  • ProcedureVisionScope Imaging (VSI) Exam

    The VisionScope Imaging (VSI) Exam \[the system itself\] is indicated for use in diagnostic and operative arthroscopic and endoscopic procedures to provide illumination, visualization, and the capture of still and motion pictures of an interior cavity of the body through a natural or surgical opening.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy

    Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed during the time of the procedure. There will be no patient followup in this study. Radiologists, post procedure, will compare/contrast the diagnostic findings of a patient's MRI, VSI and Dx Arthroscopy.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Foundation
    Los Angeles, California 90045, United States
  • Stanford School of Medicine
    Redwood, California 94063, United States
  • Santa Monica Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Group (SMOG)
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Andrews Research and Education Institute
    Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, United States
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • University of Texas SouthWestern
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • Mansfield Orthopaedics (Copley Hospital)
    Morrisville, Vermont 05661, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rheumatology 2000; 39: 700-706, British Society for Rheumatology
  • Ryzewicz M, Peterson B, Siparsky PN, Bartz RL. The diagnosis of meniscus tears: the role of MRI and clinical examination. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:123-33. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802fb9f3. PubMed 17279041 ↗
  • Ruwe PA, McCarthy SM. Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1994 Aug;2(3):475-9. PubMed 7489301 ↗
  • Rappeport ED, Wieslander SB, Stephensen S, Lausten GS, Thomsen HS. MRI preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in knee joint injuries. A double-blind comparison of 47 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Jun;68(3):277-81. doi: 10.3109/17453679708996701. PubMed 9246993 ↗
  • Rangger C, Klestil T, Kathrein A, Inderster A, Hamid L. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on indications for arthroscopy of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Sep;(330):133-42. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199609000-00016. PubMed 8804283 ↗
  • De Smet AA, Mukherjee R. Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic findings associated with failure to diagnose a lateral meniscal tear on knee MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jan;190(1):22-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2611. PubMed 18094289 ↗
  • Halinen J, Koivikko M, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in acute multi-ligament injuries. Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1733-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0689-6. Epub 2008 Dec 3. PubMed 19050885 ↗
  • Mandelbaum BR, Finerman GA, Reicher MA, Hartzman S, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Rauschning W, Dorey F. Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries. Anatomical and pathoanatomical correlations. Am J Sports Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;14(5):361-70. doi: 10.1177/036354658601400503. PubMed 3535549 ↗
  • Rayan F, Bhonsle S, Shukla DD. Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Int Orthop. 2009 Feb;33(1):129-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0520-4. Epub 2008 Feb 23. PubMed 18297284 ↗
  • von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A, Bouillon B, David A, Haage P, Lichtinger TK. Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Apr 20;11:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-75. PubMed 20406481 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01695720
Lead sponsor
VisionScope Technologies
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2012
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2013
Last update
May 31, 2013

Study contacts

Thomas J Gill, IV, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion