CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01694849Updated Nov 3, 2022Results posted

Phase IIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GFT505 Versus Placebo in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

A Phase 2 interventional study of GFT505 80mg and GFT505 120mg in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), sponsored by Genfit. Completed at 56 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-03.

Sponsored by Genfit · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
275
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Abdominal obesity and type-2 Diabetes are associated with chronic liver disorders resulting from the accumulation of fat in the liver (steatosis), which may progress towards hepatitis and possibly lead to cirrhosis and liver cancer. NAFLD (Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) is considered as the most common form of chronic liver disease in adults in the United States, Australia, Asia and Europe. In the USA, the estimated prevalence of NAFLD is 20-30% of the adult population.

Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressing form of NAFLD, which corresponds to hepatic steatosis associated with inflammation and liver cell injury upon microscopic examination of a liver biopsy. This condition may lead to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis and deserves serious medical management. Up to now, there is no effective drug which has clearly demonstrated therapeutic efficacy which may help lifestyle and dietary recommendations in the resolution of NASH.

In this context, GENFIT is developing a new liver targeted drug candidate, GFT505, for the treatment of NASH and the reduction of multiple cardiometabolic risk factors associated with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 Diabetes.

This phase IIb study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of GFT505 80mg and 120mg once daily for 52 weeks on the reversal of NASH without worsening of fibrosis, based on liver biopsy assessments.

Read the detailed description

The study duration per patient will be 80 weeks. A screening period (from 4 to 16 weeks) will precede a 52-week double-blind treatment period and a 3 months follow-up period.

The study will be conducted in 270 patients (90 patients in the placebo arm, 90 patients in the GFT505 80mg arm, and 90 patients in the GFT505 120mg arm).

Enrollment will be performed in two phases: during the first phase, the patients will receive either GFT505 at a dose of 80 mg either the placebo. An independent expert committee will review the safety data when 45 patients receiving the dose at 80 mg will have been treated for 6 months. The committee approval will be necessary to start the second phase, while the patients will receive either GFT505 at a dose of 80 mg, or GFT505 at a dose of 120 mg or the placebo.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Keywords

  • PPARs
  • NASH
  • Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis
  • Liver Diseases
  • Fibrosis
03

In context

Fatty Liver

1,451 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatty Liver; 292 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 275 is above the median of 60 across 1,003 interventional studies indexed under Fatty Liver.

Browse Fatty Liver studies →

Lead sponsor

Genfit is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females (females must be either of non-child bearing potential or using an efficient double contraception). For male participants, contraceptive measures must be taken during the study, either by the male participant or his female partner.
  • Body Mass Index ≤ 45 kg/m².
  • Patients agree to have one liver biopsy during the screening period for diagnostic purpose (if no historical biopsy within 6 months before randomization is available) and one at the end of the treatment period for assessment of the treatment effects.
  • For hypertensive patients, hypertension must be controlled by stable dose of anti-hypertensive medication for at least 2 months prior to screening (and the stable dose can be maintained throughout the study).
  • Patients treated with vitamin E (>400IU/d), or Polyunsaturated fatty acids (>2g/day)or Ursodeoxycholic acid can be included if drugs are stopped at least 3 months prior to diagnostic liver biopsy and up to the end of the study.
  • Histological confirmation of steatohepatitis on a diagnostic liver biopsy. Histological diagnostic is confirmed by central reading of the slides (steatosis > 5% + lobular inflammation, any grade + ballooning, any amount).
  • For patients with Type 2 Diabetes, glycemia must be controlled (Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c ≤8.5%). If glycemia is controlled by anti-diabetic drugs, qualitative change is not permitted within 6 months prior to randomization and should be avoided during the study. Treatments with metformin, Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 inhibitors, Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, sulfamides, insulin are authorized. Sulfamides and insulin are permitted if glycemia is self-monitored by the patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known heart failure (Grade I to IV of New York Heart Association classification).
  • Weight loss of more than 5% within 6 months prior to randomization.
  • History of bariatric surgery.
  • Uncontrolled Blood Pressure.
  • Type 1 diabetes patients.
  • Patients who had an acute cardiovascular episode within the 6 months prior to screening, or with a history of coronary angioplasty, history of stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, Coronary Heart Disease.
  • Compensated and uncompensated cirrhosis. Notably, NASH patients with fibrosis stage = 4 according to the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system are excluded.
  • Known alcohol and/or any other drug abuse or dependence in the last five years.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Other well documented causes of chronic liver disease
  • Known intolerance or contra-indication to the list of excipients of GFT505.
  • Evidence of any other unstable or, untreated clinically significant immunological, neoplastic, endocrine, haematological, gastrointestinal, neurological or psychiatric disorder.
  • Positive HBsAg (Hepatitis B Surface Antigen), Positive anti-HIV, positive HCV-RNA (Hepatitis C Virus).
  • Uncontrolled hypothyroidism defined as Thyroid Stimulating Hormone > 2X the upper limit of normal (ULN). Thyroid dysfunction controlled for at least 6 months prior to screening is permitted.
  • Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic renal failure (defined as creatinine clearance \< 60 mL/mn and serum creatinine >180 μmol/L).
  • Unexplained serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) > 3X the upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with a reason for CPK elevation may have the measurement repeated prior to randomization; a CPK retest > 3X ULN leads to exclusion.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
275 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GFT505 80mg

    Hard gelatin capsules dosed at 40mg, oral administration, 3 capsules per day before breakfast with a glass of water.

    Drug: GFT505 80mg

  • Experimental
    GFT505 120mg

    Hard gelatin capsules dosed at 40mg, oral administration, 3 capsules per day before breakfast with a glass of water.

    Drug: GFT505 120mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    hard gelatin capsules, oral administration, 3 capsules per day before breakfast with a glass of water.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGFT505 80mg
  • DrugGFT505 120mg
  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Responders With Disappearance of Steatohepatitis Without Worsening of Fibrosis (ie, Participants no Longer Meeting the Criteria for Steatohepatitis)

    Percentage of responders from baseline to Week 52 defined by the disappearance of steatohepatitis (ie, participants no longer meeting the criteria for steatohepatitis) without worsening of fibrosis. Worsening of fibrosis was evaluated using Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) fibrosis staging system and defined as: * Progression to stage 3 or 4 for participants at stage 0, 1 or 2 on diagnostic liver biopsy * Progression to stage 4 for participants at stage 3 on diagnostic liver biopsy

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg the change from baseline to Week 52, in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS score). NAS score is a composite score equal to the sum of the steatosis grade (0 to 3), lobular inflammation grade (0 to 3) and hepatocellular ballooning grade (0 to 2). The overall scale of the NAS is 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The outcome measure, change from baseline in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS), has a possible range from -8 to +8, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  2. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score of at Least 2 Points

    To evaluate the number of participants with at least a 2 point decrease from baseline in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or 120mg. The NAS refers to the severity of ongoing liver injury as assessed by a liver biopsy and is used to assess the activity of the disease. It is based on the NASH CRN methodology for scoring the severity of steatosis (score of 0 to 3), inflammation (score of 0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (score of 0 to 2), with a maximum score of 8. A total NAS score of five or greater correlates with the diagnosis of steatohepatitis. In table below for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 2 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at Least 2 points decrease on their NAS after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 20% (2 out of 10).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  3. Number of Participants With Decrease in Steatosis Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, number of participants with a decrease in steatosis score of at least 1 point between baseline and Week 52. Steatosis is assessed by a liver biopsy and evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe steatosis. A score of 0 indicating a lower severity with low parenchymal involvement (\<5%), while a score of 3 is indicative of higher involvment/severity (\> 66%). In below table and for helping how results are reported, as an example for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 1 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at least 1 point decrease Steatosis Score after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 10% (1 out of 10).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  4. Number of Participants With Decrease in Lobular Inflammation Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, number of participants with a decrease in lobular inflammation score of at least 1 point between baseline and Week 52. Lobular inflammation is assessed by a liver biopsy and evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3. A score of 0 indicating the absence of inflammation loci, while a score of 3 is indicative of a higher degree of inflammation with more than 4 inflammation loci 200 x field. In below table and for helping how results are reported, as an example for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 1 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at least 1 point decrease of Lobular Inflammation Score after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 10% (1 out of 10).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  5. Title: Number of Participants With Decrease in Ballooning Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, number of participants with a decrease in ballooning score of at least 1 point between baseline and Week 52. Ballooning is assessed by a liver biopsy and evaluated on a scale of 0 to 2 with higher scores indicating more severe ballooning (0: No ballooned cells, 1: Few \[rare but definite\] ballooned hepatocytes; 2: Many ballooned cells/prominent ballooning). In below table and for helping how results are reported, as an example for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 4 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at least 1 point decrease of Ballooning Score after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 10% (1 out of 10).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  6. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in the Stages of Fibrosis

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in stages of fibrosis (based on Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network \[NASH CRN\] scoring). Fibrosis is assessed on a scale of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe fibrosis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  7. Changes From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Liver Enzymes

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in liver enzymes.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  8. Changes From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Aspartate Transaminase/Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in aspartate transaminase/alanine aminotransferase ratio

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  9. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK 18-M65

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in CK 18-M65 (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  10. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK18 M30

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in CK18 M30 (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for CK18 M30 at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  11. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Adiponectin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in adiponectin (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  12. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Ferritin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in ferritin (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for Ferritin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  13. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: FG19 and FG21

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in FG19 and FG21 (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  14. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Alpha2 Macroglobulin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in alpha2 macroglobulin (a non-invasive marker of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for Alpha2 Macroglobulin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  15. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Hyaluronic Acid, N-terminal Pro-peptide of Collagen Type III (PIIINP), and Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloprotease-1 (TIMP-1)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in hyaluronic acid, N-terminal pro-peptide of collagen type III (PIIINP), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloprotease-1 (TIMP-1) (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  16. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrotest

    Fibrotest combines α2-macroglobulin (a2m), apolipoprotein A1 (aA1), total bilirubin (BIL), haptoglobin (h), GGT, and ALT with adjustment for age and gender. Fibrotest is calculated as: z = 4.467 x log(a2m) - 1.357 x log(h) + 1.017 x log(GGT) + 0.0281 x Age + 1.737 x log(BIL) - 1.184 x (aA1) + 0.301 x Gender - 5.54 where Gender = 1 for male and Gender = 0 for female. The score is then: 1/(1+e\^-z). Calculated score range from 0 (no fibrosis) to 1 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) In below table for "Fibrotest" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as: the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Fibrotest calculated in 81 participants is -0.06 with a standard deviation of 0.08.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  17. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Steatotest

    SteatoTest combines α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, total bilirubin, GGT, fasting glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, and ALT, adjusted for patient's age, sex, weight, and height. Patented formula. Calculated score range from 0 (no steatosis) to 1 (severe steatosis) In below table for "Steatotest" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as: the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Steatotest calculated in 81 participants is -0.09 with a standard deviation of 0.11.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  18. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Angulo Index or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score

    Angulo Index or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score is based on age, hyperglycemia, BMI, platelet count, albumin level, and AST/ALT ratio. Score is calculated using the following formula: -1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 × IFG/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 × platelet (×10\^9/l) - 0.66 × albumin (g/dl). A score of \<-1.455 indicates no advanced fibrosis and a score of \>0.676 indicates liver fibrosis. In below table for "Angulo index" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as: the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Angulo index calculated in 82 participants is 0.06 with a standard deviation of 0.53.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  19. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF)

    Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) combines measurements of tissue inhibitor of metalloprotein-ases-1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and hyaluronic acid (HA) . The ELF score is calculated as : 2.278 + 0.851 ln (HA) + 0.751 ln (PIIINP) + 0.394 ln (TIMP-1). ELF score range from An ELF score of less than 7.7 indicates no fibrosis. An ELF score greater than or equal to 9.8 indicates severe fibrosis. An ELF score of 11.3 or greater indicates cirrhosis. A decrease in ELF score represents a positive outcome In below table for "Enhanced Liver Fibrosis" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis calculated in 81 analysed participants is -0.01 with a standard deviation of 0.54.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  20. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fatty Liver Index (FLI)

    The Fatty Liver Index (FLI) combines triglycerides, BMI, GGT and Waist circumference. FLI is calculated as : (e0.953×loge\[triglycerides\]+0.139× Body Mass Index\[BMI\]+0.718×loge Gamma- Glutamyl Transferase \[GGT\]+0.053×waistcircumference-15.745)/ (1 +e0.953×loge\[triglycerides\]+0.139×BMI+0.718×loge \[GGT\]+0.053×waistcircumference-15.745) × 100. Calculated index range from 0 to 100. FLI score below 30 indicate absence of Fatty Liver and FLI Score of 60 and above indicates presence of Fatty Liver. In below table for "Fatty Liver Index" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Fatty Liver Index calculated in 82 analysed participants is -7.94 with a standard deviation of 11.74.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  21. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrometer

    Fibrometer combines Platelets, AST, ALT, ferritin, glucose (fasting plasma), Weight and gender. Patented formula. Score ranges from 0 (no fibrosis) to 1 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) In below table for "Fibrometer" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Fibrometer calculated in 81 analysed participants is 0.04 with a standard deviation of 0.23.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  22. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Total Bilirubin and Conjugated Bilirubin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in total bilirubin and conjugated bilirubin (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  23. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Prothrombin Ratio

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in prothrombin ratio (non-invasive marker of fibrosis and steatosis). The Prothrombin ratio is the ratio of a participants measured prothrombin time (in seconds) to the normal laboratory reference prothrombin time. Participants with missing data for Prothrombin ratio at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  24. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: International Normalized Ratio (INR)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in international normalized ratio (INR; non-invasive marker of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for International Normalized Ratio (INR) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  25. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid Parameters (Cardiovascular Risk Profile)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in lipid parameters (used to assess cardiovascular risk)

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  26. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Outcomes Related to Biochemistry

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in secondary outcomes related to biochemistry

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  27. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Leptin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in leptin (to assess insulin resistance).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  28. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Insulin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in insulin (to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Insulin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  29. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: C Peptide

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in C peptide (to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for C Peptide at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  30. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Homeostatic Model Assessment-insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; to assess insulin resistance). The HOMA-IR is expressed as the following: HOMA-IR = fasting serum insulin (μU/ml) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) / 22.5 A decrease in HOMA-IR indicates a positive outcome. HOMA-IR values of greater than 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance and levels above 2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance. Participants with missing data for HOMA-IR at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  31. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Free Fatty Acids (FFA)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in free fatty acids (FFA; to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Free Fatty Acids (FFA) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  32. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Plasma Glucose

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in plasma glucose (to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Plasma Glucose at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  33. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  34. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Fructosamine

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in Fructosamine (to assess insulin resistance).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  35. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in fibrinogen and haptoglobin (inflammatory markers).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  36. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha and Interleukine 6

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukine 6 (inflammatory markers).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  37. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1; inflammatory marker). Participants with missing data for Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  38. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in C-Reactive Protein (CRP; inflammatory marker).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  39. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine (Renal Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in creatinine (safety markers; renal function parameter).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  40. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine Clearance (Renal Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in creatinine clearance (safety marker; renal function parameter).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  41. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Uric Acid (Renal Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in uric acid (safety marker; renal function parameter).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  42. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN; Renal Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in blood urea nitrogen (BUN; safety marker; renal function parameter).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  43. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Cystatin C (Renal Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in cystatin C (safety marker; renal function parameter). Participants with missing data for Cystatin C at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  44. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Beta2-microglobulin (Renal Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in beta2-microglobulin (safety marker; renal function parameter). Participants with missing data for Beta2-microglobulin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  45. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP; Cardiac Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; safety marker; cardiac function parameter). Participants with missing data for NT-proBNP at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  46. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Troponin T (Cardiac Function Parameter)

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in troponin T (safety marker; cardiac function parameter). Participants with missing data for Troponin T at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

  47. Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Weight

    To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in body weight.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)

07

Results

Posted Nov 3, 2022

Participant flow

Recruitment for the GFT505-212-7 study began in September 2012. This was a phase IIb, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted in three parallel groups: placebo, GFT505 80mg and GFT505 120mg (after DSMB review of 6 month safety data of the 80mg dose on at least 50% of participants) once daily for 52 weeks.

Treatment Period (Visit 2 to Visit 8)
Participant flow — Treatment Period (Visit 2 to Visit 8)
MilestoneGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Started939092
Randomized939092
Randomised and received treatment (full analysis set and safety set)938992
Efficacy evaluable set827877
Completed847978
Not completed91114
Withdrew: Adverse event674
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject137
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up001
Withdrew: Protocol violation101
Withdrew: Non-compliance101
Withdrew: Randomized and not treated010
Follow-up Period (to Visit 9)
Participant flow — Follow-up Period (to Visit 9)
MilestoneGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Started847978
Completed837677
Not completed131
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject010
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up121

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Responders With Disappearance of Steatohepatitis Without Worsening of Fibrosis (ie, Participants no Longer Meeting the Criteria for Steatohepatitis)

Percentage of responders from baseline to Week 52 defined by the disappearance of steatohepatitis (ie, participants no longer meeting the criteria for steatohepatitis) without worsening of fibrosis. Worsening of fibrosis was evaluated using Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) fibrosis staging system and defined as: * Progression to stage 3 or 4 for participants at stage 0, 1 or 2 on diagnostic liver biopsy * Progression to stage 4 for participants at stage 3 on diagnostic liver biopsy

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Responders With Disappearance of Steatohepatitis Without Worsening of Fibrosis (ie, Participants no Longer Meeting the Criteria for Steatohepatitis)
ParticipantsGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Efficacy evaluable set — Responders211916
Efficacy evaluable set — Non-responders615961
Full analysis set — Responders211916
Full analysis set — Non-responders727076
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.8539 (To deal with multiplicity of comparisons, a step-down approach was adopted to control the type I error to 0.05. The contrast GFT120 mg versus placebo was examined first. If not significant the GFT 80mg versus placebo contrast was not examined.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.092 · 95% CI 0.427 to 2.795Standard error of the estimate
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.8160 (To deal with multiplicity of comparisons, a step-down approach was adopted to control the type I error to 0.05. The contrast GFT120 mg versus placebo was examined first. If not significant the GFT 80mg versus placebo contrast was not examined.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.897 · 95% CI 0.361 to 2.232Standard error of the estimate
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg the change from baseline to Week 52, in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS score). NAS score is a composite score equal to the sum of the steatosis grade (0 to 3), lobular inflammation grade (0 to 3) and hepatocellular ballooning grade (0 to 2). The overall scale of the NAS is 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The outcome measure, change from baseline in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS), has a possible range from -8 to +8, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · NAS score
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score
NAS scoreGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score-0.65 ± 1.33-0.64 ± 1.68-0.45 ± 1.34
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.225 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.75 to 0.2Standard error of the least squares mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.254 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.28 · 95% CI -0.76 to 0.2Standard error of the least squares mean
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score of at Least 2 Points

To evaluate the number of participants with at least a 2 point decrease from baseline in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or 120mg. The NAS refers to the severity of ongoing liver injury as assessed by a liver biopsy and is used to assess the activity of the disease. It is based on the NASH CRN methodology for scoring the severity of steatosis (score of 0 to 3), inflammation (score of 0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (score of 0 to 2), with a maximum score of 8. A total NAS score of five or greater correlates with the diagnosis of steatohepatitis. In table below for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 2 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at Least 2 points decrease on their NAS after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 20% (2 out of 10).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score of at Least 2 Points
ParticipantsGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Mild (Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)225
Moderate (Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 4-5)11129
Severe (Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 6-8)8127
Total212621
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.8586 · Odds ratio (or): 1.073 · 95% CI 0.493 to 2.339Standard error of the estimate
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.2265 · Odds ratio (or): 1.601 · 95% CI 0.747 to 3.432Standard error of the estimate
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Decrease in Steatosis Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, number of participants with a decrease in steatosis score of at least 1 point between baseline and Week 52. Steatosis is assessed by a liver biopsy and evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe steatosis. A score of 0 indicating a lower severity with low parenchymal involvement (\<5%), while a score of 3 is indicative of higher involvment/severity (\> 66%). In below table and for helping how results are reported, as an example for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 1 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at least 1 point decrease Steatosis Score after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 10% (1 out of 10).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Decrease in Steatosis Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52
ParticipantsGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Mild (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)110
Moderate (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 4-5)131012
Severe (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 6-8)3103
Total172115
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5231 · Odds ratio (or): 0.723 · 95% CI 0.267 to 1.958Standard error of the estimate
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.8459 · Odds ratio (or): 1.102 · 95% CI 0.415 to 2.924Standard error of the estimate
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Decrease in Lobular Inflammation Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, number of participants with a decrease in lobular inflammation score of at least 1 point between baseline and Week 52. Lobular inflammation is assessed by a liver biopsy and evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3. A score of 0 indicating the absence of inflammation loci, while a score of 3 is indicative of a higher degree of inflammation with more than 4 inflammation loci 200 x field. In below table and for helping how results are reported, as an example for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 1 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at least 1 point decrease of Lobular Inflammation Score after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 10% (1 out of 10).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Decrease in Lobular Inflammation Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52
ParticipantsGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Mild (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)127
Moderate (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 4-5)10118
Severe (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 6-8)141612
Total252927
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5229 · Odds ratio (or): 0.638 · 95% CI 0.161 to 2.529Standard error of the estimate
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5646 · Odds ratio (or): 1.433 · 95% CI .421 to 4.875Standard error of the estimate
SecondaryTitle: Number of Participants With Decrease in Ballooning Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, number of participants with a decrease in ballooning score of at least 1 point between baseline and Week 52. Ballooning is assessed by a liver biopsy and evaluated on a scale of 0 to 2 with higher scores indicating more severe ballooning (0: No ballooned cells, 1: Few \[rare but definite\] ballooned hepatocytes; 2: Many ballooned cells/prominent ballooning). In below table and for helping how results are reported, as an example for raw "Mild (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)" and the column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : 4 participants (out of 10 participants analysed with a baseline NAS at 3) had at least 1 point decrease of Ballooning Score after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg. It corresponds to 10% (1 out of 10).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Title: Number of Participants With Decrease in Ballooning Score of at Least 1 Point Between Baseline and Week 52
ParticipantsGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Mild (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 3)436
Moderate (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 4-5)171513
Severe (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score 6-8)10125
Total313024
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.1983 · Odds ratio (or): 0.382 · 95% CI 0.088 to 1.656Standard error of the estimate
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 1.0000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.000 · 95% CI 0.288 to 3.466Standard error of the estimate
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in the Stages of Fibrosis

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in stages of fibrosis (based on Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network \[NASH CRN\] scoring). Fibrosis is assessed on a scale of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe fibrosis.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · Change in fibrosis score
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in the Stages of Fibrosis
Change in fibrosis scoreGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in the Stages of Fibrosis-0.23 ± 0.84-0.06 ± 0.96-0.23 ± 0.90
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.3543 · Odds ratio (or): 0.653 · 95% CI 0.265 to 1.609Standard error of the estimate
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5780 · Odds ratio (or): 1.270 · 95% CI 0.547 to 2.953Standard error of the estimate
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Liver Enzymes

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in liver enzymes.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Liver Enzymes
U/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Gamma-glutamyl transferase-24.32 ± 36.39-20.59 ± 40.456.22 ± 50.64
Aspartate transaminase1.88 ± 27.76-1.37 ± 24.74-1.32 ± 16.63
Alanine aminotransferase-7.02 ± 36.21-12.54 ± 44.72-3.26 ± 24.67
Alkaline phosphatases-18.82 ± 13.23-20.44 ± 16.473.44 ± 13.16
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.711 · Difference in least square mean change: 1.24 · 95% CI -5.33 to 7.81Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.78 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.94 · 95% CI -7.58 to 5.7Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.221 · Difference in least square mean change: -6.13 · 95% CI -15.97 to 3.71Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.062 · Difference in least square mean change: -9.45 · 95% CI -19.4 to 0.49Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -23.02 · 95% CI -27.16 to -18.88Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -23.85 · 95% CI -28.04 to 2.12Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -31.41 · 95% CI -43.78 to -19.05Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -29.31 · 95% CI -41.84 to -16.77Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Aspartate Transaminase/Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in aspartate transaminase/alanine aminotransferase ratio

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Changes From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Aspartate Transaminase/Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio
ratioGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 52) in Aspartate Transaminase/Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio0.15 ± 0.210.20 ± 0.250.01 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.14 · 95% CI 0.06 to 0.21Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.19 · 95% CI 0.11 to 0.26Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK 18-M65

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in CK 18-M65 (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK 18-M65
U/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK 18-M65104.4 ± 804.96-185.01 ± 658.14-45.53 ± 437.21
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.095 · Difference in least square mean change: 141.78 · 95% CI -24.99 to 308.55Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.412 (Baseline parameter value and presence of diabetes as random factors) · Difference in least square mean change: -70.57 · 95% CI -239.85 to 98.71Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK18 M30

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in CK18 M30 (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for CK18 M30 at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · pmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK18 M30
pmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: CK18 M30-28.08 ± 574.50-66.40 ± 432.02-51.39 ± 349.64
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.592 · Difference in least square mean change: 32.39 · 95% CI -86.63 to 151.42Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.61 · Difference in least square mean change: 31.35 · 95% CI -89.42 to 152.12Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Adiponectin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in adiponectin (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Adiponectin
μg/mLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Adiponectin4.98 ± 20.251.90 ± 8.342.54 ± 9.48
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.459 · Difference in least square mean change: 1.67 · 95% CI -2.77 to 6.11Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.764 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.67 · 95% CI -5.06 to 3.72Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Ferritin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in ferritin (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for Ferritin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Ferritin
μg/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Ferritin-23.52 ± 145.61-19.68 ± 81.91-19.26 ± 122.57
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.466 · Difference in least square mean change: -12.92 · 95% CI -47.79 to 21.95Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.745 · Difference in least square mean change: -5.82 · 95% CI -41.07 to 29.42Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: FG19 and FG21

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in FG19 and FG21 (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: FG19 and FG21
pg/mLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
FG19-27.25 ± 94.19-26.03 ± 91.5911.64 ± 87.10
FG21258.74 ± 1138.36319.68 ± 433.6373.05 ± 360.41
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.018 · Difference in least square mean change: -26.57 · 95% CI -48.59 to -4.54Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -40.39 · 95% CI -62.61 to -18.17Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.101 · Difference in least square mean change: 190.07 · 95% CI -37.38 to 417.52Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.052 · Difference in least square mean change: 228.33 · 95% CI -2.16 to 458.82Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Alpha2 Macroglobulin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in alpha2 macroglobulin (a non-invasive marker of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for Alpha2 Macroglobulin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Alpha2 Macroglobulin
g/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Alpha2 Macroglobulin-0.14 ± 0.29-0.26 ± 0.360.01 ± 0.28
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.002 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.29 to -0.01Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.34 to -0.15Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Hyaluronic Acid, N-terminal Pro-peptide of Collagen Type III (PIIINP), and Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloprotease-1 (TIMP-1)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in hyaluronic acid, N-terminal pro-peptide of collagen type III (PIIINP), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloprotease-1 (TIMP-1) (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Hyaluronic Acid, N-terminal Pro-peptide of Collagen Type III (PIIINP), and Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloprotease-1 (TIMP-1)
ng/mLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Hyaluronic acid26.12 ± 230.9712.14 ± 48.0412.49 ± 48.68
PIIINP-0.50 ± 3.43-0.57 ± 3.750.29 ± 4.87
TIMP-115.21 ± 35.38-6.32 ± 39.759.08 ± 49.54
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.203 · Difference in least square mean change: -16.54 · 95% CI -42.07 to 8.98Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.603 · Difference in least square mean change: -6.79 · 95% CI -32.49 to 18.9Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.235 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.73 · 95% CI -1.95 to 0.48Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.193 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.81 · 95% CI -2.04 to 0.41Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.348 · Difference in least square mean change: 6.21 · 95% CI -6.81 to 19.22Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.029 · Difference in least square mean change: -14.66 · 95% CI -27.81 to 1.51Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrotest

Fibrotest combines α2-macroglobulin (a2m), apolipoprotein A1 (aA1), total bilirubin (BIL), haptoglobin (h), GGT, and ALT with adjustment for age and gender. Fibrotest is calculated as: z = 4.467 x log(a2m) - 1.357 x log(h) + 1.017 x log(GGT) + 0.0281 x Age + 1.737 x log(BIL) - 1.184 x (aA1) + 0.301 x Gender - 5.54 where Gender = 1 for male and Gender = 0 for female. The score is then: 1/(1+e\^-z). Calculated score range from 0 (no fibrosis) to 1 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) In below table for "Fibrotest" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as: the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Fibrotest calculated in 81 participants is -0.06 with a standard deviation of 0.08.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrotest
score on a scaleGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrotest-0.06 ± 0.08-0.07 ± 0.09-0.01 ± 0.10
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.05 · 95% CI -0.07 to -0.02Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.05 · 95% CI -0.08 to -0.02Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Steatotest

SteatoTest combines α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, total bilirubin, GGT, fasting glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, and ALT, adjusted for patient's age, sex, weight, and height. Patented formula. Calculated score range from 0 (no steatosis) to 1 (severe steatosis) In below table for "Steatotest" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as: the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Steatotest calculated in 81 participants is -0.09 with a standard deviation of 0.11.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Steatotest
score on a scaleGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Steatotest-0.09 ± 0.11-0.08 ± 0.150.03 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.15 to -0.07Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.15 to -0.07Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Angulo Index or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score

Angulo Index or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score is based on age, hyperglycemia, BMI, platelet count, albumin level, and AST/ALT ratio. Score is calculated using the following formula: -1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 × IFG/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 × platelet (×10\^9/l) - 0.66 × albumin (g/dl). A score of \<-1.455 indicates no advanced fibrosis and a score of \>0.676 indicates liver fibrosis. In below table for "Angulo index" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as: the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Angulo index calculated in 82 participants is 0.06 with a standard deviation of 0.53.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Angulo Index or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score
score on a scaleGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Angulo Index or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score0.06 ± 0.53-0.26 ± 0.57-0.01 ± 0.51
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.471 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.06 · 95% CI -0.11 to 0.23Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.005 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.25 · 95% CI -0.42 to -0.08Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF)

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) combines measurements of tissue inhibitor of metalloprotein-ases-1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and hyaluronic acid (HA) . The ELF score is calculated as : 2.278 + 0.851 ln (HA) + 0.751 ln (PIIINP) + 0.394 ln (TIMP-1). ELF score range from An ELF score of less than 7.7 indicates no fibrosis. An ELF score greater than or equal to 9.8 indicates severe fibrosis. An ELF score of 11.3 or greater indicates cirrhosis. A decrease in ELF score represents a positive outcome In below table for "Enhanced Liver Fibrosis" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis calculated in 81 analysed participants is -0.01 with a standard deviation of 0.54.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF)
score on a scaleGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF)-0.01 ± 0.54-0.01 ± 0.640.08 ± 0.70
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.457 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.27 to 0.12Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.428 · Difference in least square mean: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.28 to 0.12Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fatty Liver Index (FLI)

The Fatty Liver Index (FLI) combines triglycerides, BMI, GGT and Waist circumference. FLI is calculated as : (e0.953×loge\[triglycerides\]+0.139× Body Mass Index\[BMI\]+0.718×loge Gamma- Glutamyl Transferase \[GGT\]+0.053×waistcircumference-15.745)/ (1 +e0.953×loge\[triglycerides\]+0.139×BMI+0.718×loge \[GGT\]+0.053×waistcircumference-15.745) × 100. Calculated index range from 0 to 100. FLI score below 30 indicate absence of Fatty Liver and FLI Score of 60 and above indicates presence of Fatty Liver. In below table for "Fatty Liver Index" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Fatty Liver Index calculated in 82 analysed participants is -7.94 with a standard deviation of 11.74.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fatty Liver Index (FLI)
score on a scaleGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fatty Liver Index (FLI)-7.94 ± 11.74-7.81 ± 14.291.34 ± 11.65
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -9.22 · 95% CI -13.19 to -5.24Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -9.08 · 95% CI -13.12 to -5.04Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrometer

Fibrometer combines Platelets, AST, ALT, ferritin, glucose (fasting plasma), Weight and gender. Patented formula. Score ranges from 0 (no fibrosis) to 1 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) In below table for "Fibrometer" and for column "GFT505 80mg" the result should be read as : the mean of change from baseline to week 52 of Fibrometer calculated in 81 analysed participants is 0.04 with a standard deviation of 0.23.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrometer
score on a scaleGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Fibrometer0.04 ± 0.230 ± 0.200.02 ± 0.22
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.531 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.02 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.09Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.638 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.05Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Total Bilirubin and Conjugated Bilirubin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in total bilirubin and conjugated bilirubin (non-invasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · umol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Total Bilirubin and Conjugated Bilirubin
umol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Total bilirubin-1.53 ± 3.66-1.38 ± 4.85-1.46 ± 3.77
Conjugated bilirubin-0.35 ± 1.26-0.15 ± 1.24-0.26 ± 1.05
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.831 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.14 · 95% CI -1.39 to 1.12Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.754 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.2 · 95% CI -1.07 to 1.47Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.848 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.36 to 0.3Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.511 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.11 · 95% CI -0.22 to 0.45Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Prothrombin Ratio

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in prothrombin ratio (non-invasive marker of fibrosis and steatosis). The Prothrombin ratio is the ratio of a participants measured prothrombin time (in seconds) to the normal laboratory reference prothrombin time. Participants with missing data for Prothrombin ratio at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Prothrombin Ratio
ratioGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: Prothrombin Ratio-3.85 ± 11.571.29 ± 10.030.51 ± 14.28
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.075 · Difference in least square mean change: -2.83 · 95% CI -5.95 to 0.29Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.491 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.11 · 95% CI -4.29 to 2.07Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: International Normalized Ratio (INR)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in international normalized ratio (INR; non-invasive marker of fibrosis and steatosis). Participants with missing data for International Normalized Ratio (INR) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: International Normalized Ratio (INR)
ratioGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-invasive Markers of Fibrosis and Steatosis: International Normalized Ratio (INR)0.03 ± 0.09-0.01 ± 0.080.03 ± 0.39
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.393 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.04Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.289 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.11 to 0.03Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid Parameters (Cardiovascular Risk Profile)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in lipid parameters (used to assess cardiovascular risk)

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid Parameters (Cardiovascular Risk Profile)
mmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Triglycerides-0.33 ± 0.76-0.48 ± 0.900.16 ± 1.12
Cholesterol-0.42 ± 0.78-0.42 ± 0.720.02 ± 0.66
Non-high Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol-0.45 ± 0.79-0.47 ± 0.710.07 ± 0.67
High Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol0.02 ± 0.170.06 ± 0.23-0.06 ± 0.21
Very Low Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol-0.17 ± 0.28-0.17 ± 0.320.05 ± 0.23
Low Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol-0.27 ± 0.70-0.25 ± 0.61-0.01 ± 0.51
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.47 · 95% CI -0.73 to -0.21Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.55 · 95% CI -0.81 to -0.29Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.35 · 95% CI -0.56 to -0.14Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.43 · 95% CI -0.64 to -0.23Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.46 · 95% CI -0.67 to -0.24Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.54 · 95% CI -0.75 to -0.32Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.005 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.09 · 95% CI 0.03 to 0.15Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.11 · 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.18 · 95% CI -0.26 to -0.11Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.17 · 95% CI -0.25 to -0.09Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.031 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.38 to -0.02Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.009 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.42 to -0.06Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Outcomes Related to Biochemistry

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to week 52, in secondary outcomes related to biochemistry

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Outcomes Related to Biochemistry
mg/dLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Apo A11.63 ± 15.592.85 ± 20.42-3.90 ± 16.53
Apo B-12.80 ± 20.87-8.42 ± 16.030.94 ± 14.29
Apo AII-0.15 ± 6.634.25 ± 4.36-3.36 ± 4.82
Apo CIII-1.79 ± 3.91-0.69 ± 3.420.77 ± 4.30
Apo CIII/B-1.44 ± 2.98-0.65 ± 2.980.53 ± 3.05
Apo CIII/nonB-0.35 ± 1.79-0.04 ± 0.760.24 ± 2.53
Small dense Low Density Lipoproteins-2.09 ± 11.02-2.62 ± 6.080.60 ± 7.52
Lp(a)-0.57 ± 12.24-0.91 ± 13.750.80 ± 4.46
Apo E-1.72 ± 2.75-1.38 ± 2.99-0.29 ± 3.67
Apo E/B-1.43 ± 2.43-1.48 ± 2.64-0.21 ± 2.59
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.038 · Difference in least square mean change: 5.73 · 95% CI 0.31 to 11.14Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.012 · Difference in least square mean change: 7.07 · 95% CI 1.59 to 12.55Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -12.41 · 95% CI -17.56 to -7.25Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -9.61 · 95% CI -14.81 to -4.41Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 3.55 · 95% CI 2.14 to 4.96Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 6.1 · 95% CI 4.67 to 7.53Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -2.27 · 95% CI -3.29 to -1.25Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.004 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.5 · 95% CI -2.52 to -0.49Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.78 · 95% CI -2.63 to -0.92Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.009 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.15 · 95% CI -2 to -0.29Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.002 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.46 · 95% CI -0.75 to -0.17Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.008 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.39 · 95% CI -0.68 to -0.1Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.069 · Difference in least square mean change: -2.35 · 95% CI -4.89 to 0.19Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.01 · Difference in least square mean change: -3.39 · 95% CI -5.95 to -0.84Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.549 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.84 · 95% CI -1.93 to 3.61Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.728 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.49 · 95% CI -2.28 to 3.26Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.38 · 95% CI -2.14 to -0.61Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.004 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.12 · 95% CI -1.89 to -0.36Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.18 · 95% CI -1.82 to -0.53Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.08 · 95% CI -1.72 to -0.43Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Leptin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in leptin (to assess insulin resistance).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Leptin
ng/mLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Leptin-0.21 ± 9.553.51 ± 10.673.01 ± 8.08
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.066 · Difference in least square mean change: -2.8 · 95% CI -5.79 to 0.18Least square mean changes from baseline
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.615 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.77 · 95% CI -2.24 to 3.77Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Insulin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in insulin (to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Insulin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · pmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Insulin
pmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Insulin-33.88 ± 189.64-26.12 ± 111.768.92 ± 112.26
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.307 · Difference in least square mean change: -17.4 · 95% CI -50.88 to 16.08Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.213 · Difference in least square mean change: -21.41 · 95% CI -55.17 to 12.34Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: C Peptide

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in C peptide (to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for C Peptide at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · nmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: C Peptide
nmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: C Peptide-0.17 ± 0.55-0.03 ± 0.480.12 ± 0.58
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.003 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.23 · 95% CI -0.37 to -0.08Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.068 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.29 to 0.01Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Homeostatic Model Assessment-insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; to assess insulin resistance). The HOMA-IR is expressed as the following: HOMA-IR = fasting serum insulin (μU/ml) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) / 22.5 A decrease in HOMA-IR indicates a positive outcome. HOMA-IR values of greater than 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance and levels above 2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance. Participants with missing data for HOMA-IR at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · HOMA-IR score
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Homeostatic Model Assessment-insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA-IR scoreGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Homeostatic Model Assessment-insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)-1.10 ± 10.76-1 ± 6.861.01 ± 4.96
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.448 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.8 · 95% CI -2.86 to 1.27Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.267 · Difference in least square mean change: -1.17 · 95% CI -3.25 to 0.9Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Free Fatty Acids (FFA)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in free fatty acids (FFA; to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Free Fatty Acids (FFA) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Free Fatty Acids (FFA)
mmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Free Fatty Acids (FFA)-0.04 ± 0.25-0.04 ± 0.240.05 ± 0.26
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.095 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.05 · 95% CI -0.11 to 0.01Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.022 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.13 to -0.01Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Plasma Glucose

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in plasma glucose (to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Plasma Glucose at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Plasma Glucose
mmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Plasma Glucose0.17 ± 1.230.22 ± 1.700.67 ± 1.95
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.077 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.46 · 95% CI -0.96 to 0.05Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.172 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.36 · 95% CI -0.87 to 0.16Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; to assess insulin resistance). Participants with missing data for Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of HbA1c
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
percentage of HbA1cGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)0.22 ± 0.560.03 ± 0.700.25 ± 0.69
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.732 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.24 to 0.17Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.062 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.01Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Fructosamine

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in Fructosamine (to assess insulin resistance).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · umol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Fructosamine
umol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin Resistance: Fructosamine16.27 ± 27.53-8.24 ± 28.2111.29 ± 28.62
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4 · Difference in least square mean change: 3.66 · 95% CI -4.89 to 12.2Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -16.22 · 95% CI -24.99 to -7.44Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in fibrinogen and haptoglobin (inflammatory markers).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin
g/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Fibrinogen-0.37 ± 0.70-0.37 ± 0.79-0.05 ± 0.66
Haptoglobin-0.19 ± 0.32-0.20 ± 0.400.09 ± 0.35
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.36 · 95% CI -0.54 to -0.17Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.005 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.46 to -0.08Baseline parameter value and presence of diabetes as random factors
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.25 · 95% CI -0.35 to -0.15Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.37 to -0.17Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha and Interleukine 6

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukine 6 (inflammatory markers).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha and Interleukine 6
pg/mLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha1.37 ± 6.14-2.45 ± 38.580.19 ± 10.46
Interleukine 60.37 ± 4.20-1.14 ± 10.33-0.06 ± 1.37
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.742 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.57 · 95% CI -2.9 to 4.06Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.107 · Difference in least square mean change: 2.9 · 95% CI -0.63 to 6.43Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.362 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.5 · 95% CI -0.58 to 1.59Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.894 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.07 · 95% CI -1.03 to 1.18Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1; inflammatory marker). Participants with missing data for Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)
ng/mLGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)-0.51 ± 3.510.21 ± 4.28-0.14 ± 4.74
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.229 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.76 · 95% CI -2 to 0.48Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.463 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.45 · 95% CI -1.67 to 0.76Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg or GFT505 120mg the changes from baseline to Week 52, in C-Reactive Protein (CRP; inflammatory marker).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · Log (mg/L)
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Log (mg/L)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-0.04 ± 0.72-0.05 ± 0.810.20 ± 0.74
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.065 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.21 · 95% CI -0.42 to 0.01Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.098 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.19 · 95% CI -0.41 to 0.03Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine (Renal Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in creatinine (safety markers; renal function parameter).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · μmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine (Renal Function Parameter)
μmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine (Renal Function Parameter)2.03 ± 7.895.61 ± 8.181.27 ± 7.85
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.553 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.7 · 95% CI -1.61 to 3.01Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 4.31 · 95% CI 1.97 to 6.64Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine Clearance (Renal Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in creatinine clearance (safety marker; renal function parameter).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine Clearance (Renal Function Parameter)
mL/minGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Creatinine Clearance (Renal Function Parameter)-0.06 ± 0.94-0.56 ± 2.22-0.09 ± 0.62
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.861 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.04 · 95% CI -0.37 to 0.44Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.052 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.81 to 0Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Uric Acid (Renal Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in uric acid (safety marker; renal function parameter).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Uric Acid (Renal Function Parameter)
mmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Uric Acid (Renal Function Parameter)0 ± 0.060.01 ± 0.05-0.01 ± 0.06
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.473 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.124 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.01 · 95% CI 0 to 0.03Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN; Renal Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in blood urea nitrogen (BUN; safety marker; renal function parameter).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mmol urea/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN; Renal Function Parameter)
mmol urea/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN; Renal Function Parameter)0.61 ± 1.280.67 ± 1.22-0.17 ± 1.14
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.81 · 95% CI 0.47 to 1.15Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.85 · 95% CI 0.5 to 1.19Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Cystatin C (Renal Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in cystatin C (safety marker; renal function parameter). Participants with missing data for Cystatin C at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Cystatin C (Renal Function Parameter)
mg/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Cystatin C (Renal Function Parameter)0.05 ± 0.100.04 ± 0.220.04 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.842 · Difference in least square mean change: 0 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.04Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.589 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.05Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Beta2-microglobulin (Renal Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in beta2-microglobulin (safety marker; renal function parameter). Participants with missing data for Beta2-microglobulin at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Beta2-microglobulin (Renal Function Parameter)
μg/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Beta2-microglobulin (Renal Function Parameter)-22.26 ± 326.420.11 ± 466.43-83.48 ± 279.31
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.325 · Difference in least square mean change: 48.93 · 95% CI -8.73 to 146.6Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.066 · Difference in least square mean change: 93.21 · 95% CI -6.06 to 192.49Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP; Cardiac Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; safety marker; cardiac function parameter). Participants with missing data for NT-proBNP at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · pmol/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP; Cardiac Function Parameter)
pmol/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP; Cardiac Function Parameter)1.54 ± 4.160.38 ± 4.81-1.24 ± 5.35
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Difference in least square mean change: 2.41 · 95% CI 1.1 to 3.72Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.019 · Difference in least square mean change: 1.59 · 95% CI 0.26 to 2.91Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Troponin T (Cardiac Function Parameter)

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to week 52, in troponin T (safety marker; cardiac function parameter). Participants with missing data for Troponin T at baseline (Visit 2) or Visit 8 were not imputed in the analysis explaining the difference with the number of participants reported in the "Efficacy Evaluable Set" of the Participant Flow.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/L
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Troponin T (Cardiac Function Parameter)
μg/LGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Safety Markers: Troponin T (Cardiac Function Parameter)0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.447 · Difference in least square mean change: 0 · 95% CI 0 to 0Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.758 · Difference in least square mean change: 0 · 95% CI 0 to 0Standard error of the least square mean
SecondaryChanges From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Weight

To evaluate after 52 weeks of daily administration of GFT505 80mg, or GFT505 120mg, the changes from baseline to Week 52, in body weight.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2; Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Weight
kgGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Changes From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Weight0.11 ± 3.61-0.69 ± 4.09-0.04 ± 3.40
Statistical analysis
  • GFT505 80mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.942 · Difference in least square mean change: -0.04 · 95% CI -1.12 to 1.04Standard error of the least square mean
  • GFT505 120mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.304 · Difference in least square mean change: 0.57 · 95% CI -0.52 to 1.66Standard error of the least square mean

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event information was collected at every study visit from screening up to the termination of the study corresponding to 64 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GFT505 80mg0/93 (0%)12/93 (12.9%)85/93 (91.4%)
GFT505 120mg0/89 (0%)14/89 (15.7%)86/89 (96.6%)
Placebo0/92 (0%)9/92 (9.8%)85/92 (92.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 41
Most frequent serious events
EventGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
Pancreatitis AcuteGastrointestinal disorders0/932/890/92
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/931/890/92
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/931/890/92
SepsisInfections and infestations0/931/890/92
Ankle fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/931/890/92
OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/931/890/92
Diabetes mellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/931/890/92
Diabetes ketoacidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/931/890/92
Lumbar spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/931/890/92
Parathyroid tumour benignNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/931/890/92
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 51
Most frequent other events
EventGFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders18/9317/8914/92
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/9312/8915/92
FatigueGeneral disorders13/9312/8914/92
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders14/939/896/92
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders12/939/8913/92
LeukocyturiaRenal and urinary disorders10/938/8912/92
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders9/9311/8911/92
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications6/9311/8910/92
BronchitisInfections and infestations10/936/898/92
InfluenzaInfections and infestations10/933/895/92

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Mean53.26 ± 11.0252.88 ± 11.6352.88 ± 11.9953.01 ± 11.51
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Female444237123
Male494755151
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Race — Caucasian887185244
Race — Black25310
Race — Asian0617
Race — Other37313
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Mean31.80 ± 5.2031.04 ± 4.3930.91 ± 4.1531.25 ± 4.61
Type 2 diabetes
Type 2 diabetes(participants)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Type 2 diabetes (Yes)373733107
Type 2 diabetes (No)565259167
Height
Height(cm)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Mean167.77 ± 9.30170.21 ± 10.69169.21 ± 10.23169.05 ± 10.09
Weight
Weight(kg)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Mean89.62 ± 17.7690.15 ± 15.5788.72 ± 15.7989.49 ± 16.36
Waist Circumference
Waist Circumference(cm)GFT505 80mgGFT505 120mgPlaceboTotal
Mean106.41 ± 13.09106.26 ± 10.28104.68 ± 10.52105.78 ± 11.37
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • Site 920
    Fresno, California CA 9372, United States
  • Site 903
    La Jolla, California CA 92037, United States
  • Site 911
    Aurora, Colorado CO 80045, United States
  • Site 912
    Gainesville, Florida FL 32610-0277, United States
  • Site 924
    Atlanta, Georgia GA 30303, United States
  • Site 917
    Atlanta, Georgia GA 30322, United States
  • Site 909
    New Orleans, Louisiana LA 70112-2600, United States
  • Site 921
    Worcester, Massachusetts MA 01655, United States
  • Site 902
    Detroit, Michigan MI 48202, United States
  • Site 927
    New York, New York NY 10029-6574, United States
  • Site 908
    Durham, North Carolina NC 27710, United States
  • Site 919
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania PA 19104, United States
  • Site 916
    Memphis, Tennessee TN 38104, United States
  • Site 913
    Fort Sam Houston, Texas TX 78234, United States
  • Site 923
    Houston, Texas TX 77030, United States
  • Site 906
    San Antonio, Texas TX 78215, United States
  • Site 931
    Salt Lake City, Utah UT 84132, United States
  • Site 930
    Charlottesville, Virginia VA 22908, United States
  • Site 901
    Richmond, Virginia VA 23298, United States
  • Site 205
    Brussels, 1070, Belgium
  • Site 201
    Edegem, B-2650, Belgium
  • Site 204
    Gent, B-9000, Belgium
  • Site 202
    Haine-Saint-Paul, 7100, Belgium
  • Site 203
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Site 106
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Site 102
    Angers, 49933, France
  • Site 114
    Clichy, 92110, France
  • Site 103
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Site 113
    Lyon, 69317, France
  • Site 111
    Marseille, 13285, France
  • Site 108
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Site 104
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • Site 109
    Nice, 06202, France
  • Site 112
    Paris, 75571, France
  • Site 101
    Paris, 75651, France
  • Site 107
    Pessac, 33604, France
  • Site 405
    Bonn, 53127, Germany
  • Site 404
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Site 507
    Milano, 20122, Italy
  • Site 503
    Palermo, 90127, Italy
  • Site 504
    Roma, 00133, Italy
  • Site 501
    Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Site 303
    Amsterdam, 1100, Netherlands
  • Site 302
    Nijmegen, 6500, Netherlands
  • Site 603
    Bucharest, 021105, Romania
  • Site 601
    Bucharest, 022328, Romania
  • Site 602
    Bucharest, 022328, Romania
  • Site 703
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Site 707
    Majadahonda, 28222, Spain
  • Site 705
    Malaga, 29010, Spain
  • Site 706
    Santander, 39008, Spain
  • Site 701
    Sevilla, 41014, Spain
  • Site 802
    Camberley, GU16 7UJ, United Kingdom
  • Site 808
    Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
  • Site 801
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
  • Site 803
    Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Francque S, Bedossa P, Lehert P, Serfaty L, Romero-Gomez M, Boursier J, Abdelmalek M, Caldwell S, Drenth J, Anstee QM, Hum D, Hanf R, Roudot A, Megnien S, Staels B, Sanyal A; GOLDEN-505 Investigator Study Group. Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-alpha and -delta, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Without Fibrosis Worsening. Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(5):1147-1159.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.038. Epub 2016 Feb 11. Erratum In: Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):2084. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.017. PubMed 26874076 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01694849
Lead sponsor
Genfit
Collaborators
Naturalpha, Premier Research Group plc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 27, 2012
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
Nov 3, 2022
Last update
Nov 3, 2022

Study contacts

Rémy HANF, PhD
study director · Development Director Genfit, France
Pr. Vlad RATZIU, M.D.
study chair · International Coordinator - La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital - Paris 13, France
Pr. Arun SANYAL, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator -Virginia Commonwealth University - Richmond - USA
Dr. Sven FRANCQUE, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator - UZA - Edegem - Belgium
Dr. Jost PH DRENTH, MD, Ph.D
principal investigator · National Coordinator - UMC St Radboud Nijmegen - Nijmegen - The Netherlands
Pr. Michael Manns, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator - Medical School of Hannover - Hannover - Germany
Pr. Elisabetha BUGIANESI, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator - University of Torino - S. Giovanni Battista Hospital - Torino - Italy
Pr. Mihai VOICULESCU, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator - Center of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute - Bucharest - Romania
Pr. Manuel ROMERO-GOMEZ, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator - Valme University hospital - Sevilla - Spain
Pr. Quentin M. ANSTEE, M.D.
principal investigator · National Coordinator - Freeman Hospital - Newcastle - UK

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion