ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01690078Updated Apr 20, 2017

Functional Modeling of the Pediatric Airway

An observational study in Subglottic Stenosis (SGS), Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) and Micrognathia, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-20.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
39
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hypothesize that a functional computational model that simulates the mechanical and aerodynamic behavior of the upper airway in children with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) and laryngeal lesions (e.g. subglottic stenosis or SGS) can be used as an effective diagnostic and treatment planning tool.

02

Conditions studied

  • Subglottic Stenosis (SGS)
  • Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS)
  • Micrognathia
  • Normal Controls From CT Scans of the Upper Airway

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Airway modeling
  • Pierre Robin Sequence or PRS
  • Micrognathia
  • Subglottic Stenosis or SGS
03

In context

Micrognathism

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Micrognathism; 7 are open to participants now.

Browse Micrognathism studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children \< 18 years of age with a diagnosis of either Pierre Robin Sequence, Micrognathia or Subglottic Stenosis.

Clinically indicated control data will be collected from CT scans of neck and maxillofacial CT scans performed on children \< 18 years of age

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Micrognathia, Suspected or Diagnosis of PRS, defined (Gorlin) as:

    micrognathia (mandibular hypoplasia), cleft palate and airway obstruction, and/or

    Diagnosis of SGS defined (Bluestone) as:

    • subglottic airway diameter of 4 mm or less in a term neonate;
    • subglottic airway diameter of 3.5 mm or less in a premature neonate;
    • inability to pass an endotracheal tube of expected size for age
  2. by parent or legal guardian
  3. Age \< 18 years at enrollment
  4. Scheduled for clinically indicated endoscopic upper airway evaluation
  5. Ability to comply with study visits and study procedures as judged by the site investigator

Inclusion criterion also included for Specific Aim 2 (Longitudinal):

Subjects must be scheduled for an operative procedure to correct or bypass upper airway obstruction (i.e. mandibular distraction, endoscopic airway surgery, laryngotracheoplasty, cricotracheal resection, or tracheostomy) OR recently (within past 4 weeks) diagnosed as having an anomaly not currently requiring surgical management.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute, intercurrent respiratory infection, defined as an increase from baseline in cough, wheezing, or respiratory rate with onset in the preceding week.
  2. Physical findings at screening that would compromise the safety of the participant or the quality of the study (i.e. fever, increased respiratory rate above baseline, significant acute emesis, or alteration in baseline neurologic status).
  3. For research CT scans any sedation risk, such as Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) with upper airway obstruction, residual oxygen requirement, and an unsecured airway.

Control data will be collected from clinically indicated neck or maxillofacial CT imaging data that include the entire airway with no noted airway obstructions or airway abnormalities.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Cross sectional

    Cross sectional study where subjects with PRS, micrognathia, or SGS will have a single study visit that will be scheduled within 14 days of a clinically indicated upper airway endoscopy. CT scans of the neck or maxillofacial CT will be obtained in all subjects. During upper airway endoscopy, airway measurements will be conducted. Cohort may include subjects who have previously undergone medical or surgical intervention for their airway obstruction, or who are currently undergoing multidisciplinary team management. The following data will be collected: clinical parameters, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)OSA-18 (quality of life) questionnaire, and lung function tests (subjects \> 4 years of age). Clinically indicated swallowing studies and voice evaluations will be collected.

  • Longitudinal

    The prospective, longitudinal cohort arm of the study is designed to describe the effects of treatment on clinical and computational model endpoints. This is performed in a subset of subjects with PRS, micrognathia, or SGS who are scheduled for clinically indicated upper airway endoscopy and who are scheduled to complete a definitive treatment course which necessitates multiple endoscopic evaluations and follow-up imaging. Subjects will have an entry visit comparable to the cross-sectional entry visit. Longitudinal subjects will have up to 3 additional study visits over a 12 to 15-month period.

  • Normal Control Data

    Normal de-identified control data is retrospectively collected from clinically indicated CT scans of the neck and maxillofacial CT scans in children less than 18 years of age.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional computational model outcome parameters

    Change in functional computational modeling parameters as compared to the change in percent of total time spent with oxygen saturation \< 90% as noted on polysomnogram (physiologic measure) and change in airway measurements obtained via clinically indicated upper airway endoscopy (anatomic measure) pre and post-intervention(medical or surgical)

    Time frame: years 1- 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Validation of Computational model

    Apply the computational model to infants and children being evaluated for Pierre Robin Sequence and Subglottic Stenosis, to determine the ability of the model to accurately predict the results of various potential interventions on anatomic and physiologic metrics.

    Time frame: year 4

07

Study locations

1 site
  • North Carolina Children's Hospital
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Calloway HE, Kimbell JS, Davis SD, Retsch-Bogart GZ, Pitkin EA, Abode K, Superfine R, Zdanski CJ. Comparison of endoscopic versus 3D CT derived airway measurements. Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2136-41. doi: 10.1002/lary.23836. PubMed 24167819 ↗
  • Mitran S. Continuum-kinetic-microscopic model of lung clearance due to core-annular fluid entrainment. J Comput Phys. 2013 Jul 1;244:193-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.037. PubMed 23729842 ↗
  • Mitran (2012c), Predictive Modeling of Upper Airway Flow in Young Children, Proceedings, 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC'12), San Diego, CA, (accepted).
  • Mitran, S. (2012b), "Lattice Fokker-Planck Method Based on Wasserstein Gradient Flows", Phys. Rev.E., (under review).
  • Alabi OS, Wu X, Harter JM, Phadke M, Pinto L, Petersen H, Bass S, Keifer M, Zhong S, Healey C, Taylor RM 2nd. Comparative Visualization of Ensembles Using Ensemble Surface Slicing. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2012 Jan 22;8294:82940U. doi: 10.1117/12.908288. PubMed 23560167 ↗
  • Yi Hong, Yundi Shi, Martin Styner, Mar Sanchez, and Marc Niethammer. Simple Geodesic Regression for Image Time-Series. Accepted to the 5th Workshop on Biomedical Image Registration. 2012.
  • Hong Y, Joshi S, Sanchez M, Styner M, Niethammer M. Metamorphic geodesic regression. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 3):197-205. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_25. PubMed 23286131 ↗
  • Zdanski, C., Kimbell, J.S., Superfine, R.S., and Davis, S. (2012). Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Pediatric Airway Utilizing Computed Tomography in Children with Pierre Robin Sequence. Poster presentation, European Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 20-23, 2012.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01690078
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2012
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Aug 2015
Last update
Apr 20, 2017

Study contacts

Stephanie D Davis, MD
principal investigator · Indiana University School of Medicine
Carlton Zdanski, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Richard Superfine, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion