CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01673282VICTOSUpdated Nov 15, 2016Results posted

Study Evaluating Changes in Total Drug Load and Seizure Frequency Using Vimpat® (Lacosamide) in Combination Therapy

An observational study in Focal Epilepsy With and Without Secondary Generalization, sponsored by UCB Pharma GmbH. Completed at 42 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-15.

Sponsored by UCB Pharma GmbH · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
315
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to investigate how VIMPAT® is used as adjunctive therapy in clinical practice and will also evaluate the subsequent change in the drug load of patients after addition of VIMPAT® to their treatment regimen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Focal Epilepsy With and Without Secondary Generalization

Keywords

  • Lacosamide
  • Vimpat
  • Focal Epilepsy
  • Drug Load
  • AED
  • SP1065
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,804 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 417 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 315 is above the median of 102 across 521 observational studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

UCB Pharma GmbH is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with focal epilepsy with or without secondary generalization.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has not received Vimpat® more than 7 days prior to start of Non-Interventional Study (NIS)
  • The patient must have a diagnosis of epilepsy with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization
  • Based on the physician's clinical judgment, it is in the patient's best interest to be prescribed adjunctive Vimpat® (ie, the decision to prescribe Vimpat® is made by the physician)
  • Patient must be at least 18 years of age
  • The patient must have had at least one seizure within the last 3 months prior to enrolment
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
315 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Vimpat + Na Channel Blocking AED

    Patients prescribed adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) added to one or more baseline Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) to include at least 1 sodium channel blocking AED.

    Drug: Lacosamide

  • Vimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED

    Patients prescribed adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) added to one or more baseline Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs), none of which is a sodium channel blocking AED.

    Drug: Lacosamide

Interventions

  • DrugLacosamide

    Route of Administration: oral/subcutaneous Form and Dosage: Tablet (50 mg/100 mg/150 mg, 200 mg); Syrup (10 mg/ml); Solution for infusion (10 mg/ml).

    Also known as: Vimpat, LCM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Percent Change in Ratio of Dose and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for the Drug Load of Concomitant Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) From Baseline to the End of Observation Period (Day 0 to 6 Months)

    Drug load is defined as the sum of the ratios of the actual doses divided by the defined daily dose for all concomitant AEDs.

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day 0) to 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 15, 2016

Participant flow

This study started to enroll subjects in Austria and Germany in July 2012 and concluded in July 2015.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED
Started153158
Completed120132
Not completed3326
Withdrew: Adverse drug reaction - vimpat95
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy92
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1110
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject33
Withdrew: Other16

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Percent Change in Ratio of Dose and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for the Drug Load of Concomitant Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) From Baseline to the End of Observation Period (Day 0 to 6 Months)

Drug load is defined as the sum of the ratios of the actual doses divided by the defined daily dose for all concomitant AEDs.

Time frame:
From Baseline (Day 0) to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percent change of ratio in dose
The Percent Change in Ratio of Dose and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for the Drug Load of Concomitant Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) From Baseline to the End of Observation Period (Day 0 to 6 Months)
percent change of ratio in doseVimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED
The Percent Change in Ratio of Dose and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for the Drug Load of Concomitant Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) From Baseline to the End of Observation Period (Day 0 to 6 Months)-15.0 ± 64.8-4.4 ± 31.9
Statistical analysis
  • Vimpat + Na Channel Blocking AED vs Vimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED · ANCOVA · p = =0.0003 · Least square mean: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.36 to -0.11

Adverse events

Collected over During the entire study period (day 0 - month 6). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Vimpat + Na Channel Blocking AED—1/153 (0.7%)22/153 (14.4%)
Vimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED—6/158 (3.8%)9/158 (5.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventVimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders1/1530/158
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders0/1531/158
PalpitationsCardiac disorders0/1531/158
Electrocardiogram QT prolongedInvestigations0/1531/158
EpilepsyNervous system disorders0/1531/158
SeizureNervous system disorders0/1531/158
Adverse eventGeneral disorders0/1531/158
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders0/1531/158
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1531/158
Respiratory arrestRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1531/158
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventVimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AED
Off label useInjury, poisoning and procedural complications15/1537/158
OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications15/1537/158
Drug ineffectiveGeneral disorders9/1532/158

Baseline characteristics

The analysis group for Baseline Characteristics is the Safety Set (SS). The Safety Set consists of all patients who received at least 1 dose of Lacosamide.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Vimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AEDTotal Title
<=18 years101
Between 18 and 65 years135117252
>=65 years174158
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Vimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AEDTotal Title
Mean44.0 ± 16.452.5 ± 16.048.3 ± 16.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Vimpat + Na Channel Blocking AEDVimpat + Non-Na Channel Blocking AEDTotal Title
Female7966145
Male7492166
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • 60
    Innsbruck, Austria
  • 61
    Mauer bei Amstetten, Austria
  • 63
    Ried, Austria
  • 18
    Berlin, Germany
  • 34
    Berlin, Germany
  • 43
    Berlin, Germany
  • 66
    Berlin, Germany
  • 23
    Bonn, Germany
  • 25
    Dortmund, Germany
  • 35
    Duesseldorf, Germany
  • 48
    Erbach, Germany
  • 59
    Erlangen, Germany
  • 30
    Essen, Germany
  • 47
    Giessen, Germany
  • 29
    Goettingen, Germany
  • 37
    Goettingen, Germany
  • 05
    Haag, Germany
  • 12
    Halle, Germany
  • 19
    Halle, Germany
  • 39
    Heidenheim, Germany
  • 54
    Ibbenbueren, Germany
  • 27
    Jena, Germany
  • 04
    Jülich, Germany
  • 13
    Kehl-Kork, Germany
  • 36
    Kiel, Germany
  • 28
    Koeln, Germany
  • 40
    Koeln, Germany
  • 38
    Leipzig, Germany
  • 52
    Magdeburg, Germany
  • 67
    Mainz, Germany
  • 49
    Mittweida, Germany
  • 01
    München, Germany
  • 08
    Oranienburg, Germany
  • 17
    Osnabrück, Germany
  • 14
    Radeberg, Germany
  • 15
    Rüsselsheim, Germany
  • 16
    Senftenberg, Germany
  • 41
    Stuttgart, Germany
  • 09
    Troisdorf, Germany
  • 22
    Tübingen, Germany
  • 20
    Ulm, Germany
  • 07
    Westerstede, Germany
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01673282
Lead sponsor
UCB Pharma GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2012
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Results posted
Nov 15, 2016
Last update
Nov 15, 2016

Study contacts

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
study director · UCB Pharma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion