CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01672684Updated Oct 17, 2014

Phase I: At-Home Support for Rural Women Using Group Video Calling

A Phase 1 interventional study of support group therapy and educational intervention in Depression, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Recurrent Breast Cancer, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-17.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized phase I trial studies at-home group video calling sessions in quality of life in rural patients with breast cancer. At-home group video calling support sessions may improve the well-being and quality of life of women who have breast cancer

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To examine whether delivering at-home professionally-led breast cancer support using group video calling is feasible, acceptable and satisfactory for women in rural northern California.

II. To evaluate the feasibility of using on-line tools to recruit, screen, treat, and assess this population for a subsequent randomized clinical trial.

III. Assess whether the rate of recruitment of women in this region in this study using predominantly on-line means of recruitment can be improved over that of the previous study using predominantly face-to-face means of recruitment.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Estimate effect size changes in measures of quality of life (post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, depression symptoms, perceived stress, and positive states of mind), satisfaction with social support, and self-efficacy for coping with cancer.

II. Prescribe sample size. III. Perform I and II for all of these outcomes.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I (experimental arm): Participants complete at-home group video calling sessions for 1 1/2 hours once weekly for 8 weeks.

ARM II (control arm): Participants receive an educational workbook journal.

After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up for 1 week.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Recurrent Breast Cancer
  • Stage IA Breast Cancer
  • Stage IB Breast Cancer
  • Stage II Breast Cancer
  • Stage IIIA Breast Cancer
  • Stage IIIB Breast Cancer
  • Stage IIIC Breast Cancer
  • Stage IV Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • quality of life
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • To be eligible for this study, the participant must have been diagnosed with breast cancer within the previous 5 years prior to study entry; individuals who have been diagnosed with any stage of breast cancer are eligible
  • There are no limitations regarding allowable type and amount of prior therapy
  • There are no race/ethnic restrictions
  • There are no life expectancy restrictions
  • Neither Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) nor Karnofsky performance status will be employed
  • There are no requirements for organ and marrow function
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document; this will be assessed in the telephone screen conducted by Lisa Frankel as she will review each section of the consent form with the participant and ask if she has any questions about it; this telephone screen will have been approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (IRB), and Lisa Frankel will conduct the interviews in a private location to ensure confidentiality
  • Eligibility for this study requires that a woman be a resident of one of 27 rural counties in California (Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Glenn, Imperial, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne, or Yuba, except we will not include women living within the following cities: Chico, Madera, Redding, Rocklin, Roseville or Yuba City, due to this study's more rural focus)
  • Eligibility for this study requires that a woman has sufficient hearing to be able to engage in conversation over the phone
  • Eligibility for this study requires that a woman has a private place available where she can access the internet
  • Eligibility for this study requires that a woman is potentially available to meet at the day of the week and time of the day that the group intervention is scheduled â in the event that she is randomly assigned to receive the at-home group calling intervention
  • Eligibility for this study requires that women have broadband or digital subscriber line (DSL) internet access
  • Eligibility for this study requires that women have a computer with a webcam and either a microphone or a phone available to call into the video conference

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no therapy restrictions
  • There are no restrictions regarding use of other investigational agents
  • There are no exclusion requirements due to co-morbid disease or incurrent illness
  • Requirements regarding history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to investigational agent or device are not applicable to this study
  • There are no exclusion criteria relating to concomitant medications or substances that have the potential to affect the activity or pharmacokinetics of the study agent
  • There are no other agent-specific exclusion criteria
  • Pregnancy or nursing patients will not be excluded from the study
  • Patients who are cancer survivors or those who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive will not be excluded from the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (experimental arm)

    Participants complete at-home group video calling sessions for 1 1/2 hours once weekly for 8 weeks.

    Procedure: support group therapy

  • Active comparator
    Arm II (control arm)

    Participants receive an educational workbook journal.

    Other: educational intervention

Interventions

  • Proceduresupport group therapy

    Complete at-home group video calling support sessions

  • Othereducational intervention

    Receive an educational workbook journal

    Also known as: intervention, educational

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of the study protocol as determined primarily through qualitative analysis of the group sessions and the interview data

    The major criterion for determining feasibility is to determine whether we can recruit rural women with breast cancer more rapidly using predominantly on-line procedures in this study than in our previous study that predominantly used face-to-face procedures. The qualitative data for determining the feasibility will be collected during the at-home group video calling sessions and from women's interviews conducted at the end of the study. Will be assessed using mixed methods.

    Time frame: At 1 week post-intervention

  2. Acceptability of the study protocol as determined primarily through qualitative analysis of the group sessions and the interview data

    The qualitative data for determining the acceptability will be collected during the at-home group video calling sessions and from women's interviews conducted at the end of the study. Will be assessed using mixed methods.

    Time frame: At 1 week post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in quality of life (posttraumatic stress, depression symptoms, perceived stress, and positive states of mind)

    Treatment effect size will be estimated for each measure for the purpose of prescribing the sample size for a subsequent larger randomized clinical trial examining efficacy of the intervention. Will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 1 week post-intervention

  2. Changes in satisfaction with social support

    Treatment effect size will be estimated for each measure for the purpose of prescribing the sample size for a subsequent larger randomized clinical trial examining efficacy of the intervention. Will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 1 week post-intervention

  3. Changes in self-efficacy for coping with cancer

    Treatment effect size will be estimated for each measure for the purpose of prescribing the sample size for a subsequent larger randomized clinical trial examining efficacy of the intervention. Will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 1 week post-intervention

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Sierra Streams Institute
    Nevada City, California 95959, United States
  • Stanford University Cancer Institute
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01672684
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
California Breast Cancer Research Program
Responsible party
Cheryl Koopman (Professor (Research) of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Jun 2014
Last update
Oct 17, 2014

Study contacts

Cheryl Koopman
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion