CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01667445Updated Apr 28, 2015

Evaluation of the Use of Spinal Epimorph in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Phase 4 interventional study of Epimorph and Spinal analgesia in Post-operative Pain and Osteoarthritis, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-28.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of spinal epimorph to patient's perioperative pain management in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study is designed to determine whether spinal epimorph and its associated complications is a necessary addition to provide adequate analgesia given the multimodal approach to pain management. It is hypothesized that perioperative local infiltration with a cocktail of local and systemic analgesics will provide equal analgesia to patients who are given both local infiltration and spinal epimorph perioperatively.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomized control trial comparing two patient populations obtained from patients who will receive a primary total knee arthroplasty at LHSC University Campus. Patient participants will be recruited and consented from the arthroplasty clinic and from the preadmit clinic at University Hospital. Both the patients and those measuring the primary outcome, namely, visual pain scales will be blinded to the experimental treatment received.

Patients will be randomized to receive either a spinal with epimorph (150ug) or a spinal with no epimorph at the time of their total hip arthroplasty. This is determined as a result of a computer generated randomization within blocks of 10 (every 10 patients there will be an even number of patients within each group). As each patient signs up they are given a consecutive study number which will determine which group they are assigned to. Note should be made that at the current time patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty may or may not receive epimorph preoperatively depending on their anaesthesiologist (personal communication with Sue Ganapathy) and so both treatment arms represent the current standard of care at LHSC. Again, spinal epimorph is currently being administered for total joint replacement, irregardless of whether or not this study is being done. It is an acceptable standard of care analgesic that is available to each anesthetist should they choose to use it. Many choose to use it as they feel it improves analgesia in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, which are recognized as very painful procedures (especially total knees). This is no different that one anesthetist preferring to use dilaudid for pain control and another choosing to use morphine. Both are within accepted standard of care guidelines and it is up to the individual staff to utilize the drug they feel is most beneficial. This decision is based on each individual consultant's interpretation of the available literature as well as their personal practice experience. I hope this justifies our study as we are not introducing any new treatment. Patients will receive spinal epimorph whether or not we conduct this study. As such, no formal study discontinuation rules are applicable. Both patient groups will receive medical treatment as required around the time of their procedure.

Both groups of patients will receive standardized preoperative analgesia including gabapentin (600mg), acetaminophen (975 mg) and naprosyn (500mg). Both groups will receive local anaesthesia in the form of local infiltration of the wound with a previously studied cocktail of morphine, ketoralac, epinephrine and ropivicaine. (3) Post operatively patients will remain on PCA until post operative day one and then will be changed to a standardized oral protocol including long and short acting narcotics on a PRN basis, acetaminophen (975 mg Q6h x 48hrs and then on a PRN basis), naproxyn (500mg BID x 7 days) and gabapentin (300mg BID x 7 days).

Postoperatively visual analogue pain scales will be recorded at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48hrs as well as at 1 week. Foley usage, oxygen usage, nausea/vomiting and use of antiemetics and antipruritics will also be carefully documented. Both patient groups will receive the standard post operative physiotherapy and will be discharged home with a prescription for the narcotic or analgesics that were providing them with suitable analgesia during their hospital stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-operative Pain
  • Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • total knee arthroplasty
  • epimorph
  • analgesia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 113 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 352 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must receive a primary total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to have a spinal anaesthetic
  • Intolerance to narcotic pain medication
  • Inability to use a Patient Controlled Analgesia
  • Revision total knee arthroplasty
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
113 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    epimorph

    single dose administration of 150mcg epimorph

    Drug: Epimorph

  • Active comparator
    spinal analgesia

    spinal alone

    Drug: Spinal analgesia

Interventions

  • DrugEpimorph

    Patient to receive 150ug of Epimorph with Spinal anaesthetic. Injection Cocktail includes: 10mg Morphine, 30mg Ketorolac, 3.5ug/ml (385ug total) of Ropivicaine, 2.5ug /ml (275ug total) Epinephrine with the remainder of the solution made of Normal Saline to a total volume of 110ml.

    Also known as: morphine sulfate, Duramorph PF, MS Contin, Roxano

  • DrugSpinal analgesia

    Patient to receive only Spinal anaesthetic (NO EPIMORPH). Injection Cocktail includes: 10mg Morphine, 30mg Ketorolac, 3.5ug/ml (385ug total) of Ropivicaine, 2.5ug /ml (275ug total) Epinephrine with the remainder of the solution made of Normal Saline to a total volume of 110ml.

    Also known as: Analgesia cocktail

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. visual analogue scale for pain

    Time frame: 1 week post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. patient report of nausea

    Time frame: 48hours post-operatively

  2. patient report of pruritus

    Time frame: 48hours post-operatively

  3. catheterization requirements

    Time frame: 48hours post-operatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01667445
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Responsible party
James Howard (Orthopaedic surgeon, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 17, 2012
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Last update
Apr 28, 2015

Study contacts

James L Howard, MD
principal investigator · London Health Sciences Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion