CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01656772VERSATILEUpdated Jul 1, 2015Results posted

Vdrive Evaluation of Remote Steering and Testing in Lasso Electrophysiology Procedures Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of Vdrive Lasso navigation and Manual Lasso navigation in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Stereotaxis. Completed at 5 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-01.

Sponsored by Stereotaxis · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the use of a robotic device that is remotely controlled to maneuver a circular mapping catheter in the left atrium during Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures.

Read the detailed description

Key to the success of an electrophysiology procedure is the ability to accurately map, sense and pace the heart. Electrophysiology mapping catheters are available in a variety of shapes and electrode configurations. The majority of these catheters are manipulated manually by the physician. The Vdrive simplifies these manipulations by allowing an operator to mechanically advance, retract, rotate, deflect and maneuver a circular mapping catheter. The circular mapping catheter is not altered in structure, function or indication in the same manner as the predicate device (Cardiodrive Catheter Advancement System).

This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded, controlled study comparing manual navigation of a circular mapping catheter with mechanical navigation by the Vdrive. A total of 120 patients are expected to complete the study: 80 patients in the Vdrive navigation arm and 40 patients in the manual navigation arm. Patients will be enrolled at a minimum of one site in the European Union where the product is currently marketed and the United States, where the Vdrive is considered to be investigational.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • magnetic navigation
  • robotic control
  • RMT ThermoCool catheter
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Stereotaxis is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Left atrial AF ablation procedure requiring the use of a Lasso mapping catheter
  • Subject must be at least 18 years of age
  • Subject must be male, female of no childbearing potential, or a female that has a negative pregnancy test prior to randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to safely expose subject to a magnetic field
  • Prior AF ablation procedure
  • Patients with fewer than 4 PVs are excluded
  • Patients with persistent AF in whom early recurrence of AF following cardioversion would preclude completion of the pacing maneuvers described in the protocol or patients with other conditions that would similarly preclude completion of the pacing maneuvers
  • Contraindication to procedure or unable to return for follow-up
  • History of clotting disorder, bleeding abnormalities or contraindication to anticoagulation
  • Actively participating in other cardiac device trial(s)
  • Currently pregnant
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Prosthetic valves
  • Atrial abnormalities (thrombus, myxoma or baffle)
  • Other exclusions per the investigator
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Manual Lasso navigation

    Use of conventional manual navigation techniques with the Lasso catheter

    Procedure: Manual Lasso navigation

  • Experimental
    Vdrive Lasso navigation

    Use of the Vdrive to remotely and robotically control the manipulation of a Lasso catheter

    Device: Vdrive Lasso navigation

Interventions

  • DeviceVdrive Lasso navigation

    Remote robotic Lasso navigation

  • ProcedureManual Lasso navigation

    Manually maneuver a Lasso catheter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Effectiveness Endpoint is the Successful Navigation and EGM Recording of Each Pre-specified Pulmonary Vein Per Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.

    Success was navigating and sensing by obtaining an EGM at the pre-specified targeted PVs. The null hypothesis was to be tested at the α = 0.05 significance level using a test statistic Z based on the Farrington and Manning likelihood score statistic with adjustment to take into account the correlation between multiple observations (PVs) on the same subject. The null hypothesis was to be rejected if Z \> 1.645 or, equivalently, if the corresponding p-value was less than 0.05.

    Time frame: Peri-procedural

  2. Safety Outcome to be Assessed by Comparing the Rate of Adjudicated Serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of the Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.

    The Vdrive will allow physicians to manipulate compatible circular mapping catheters while maintaining a safety profile that is not inferior to manual circular catheter navigation. The one-sided null hypothesis was to be tested at the α = 0.05 significance level using a standard unpooled asymptotically normal test statistic. The null hypothesis was to be rejected if Z \< -1.7046 or, equivalently, if the corresponding p-value was less than 0.05.

    Time frame: 7 days Follow-up

07

Results

Posted Jun 4, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneManual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso Navigation
Started4377
Completed4377
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Primary Effectiveness Endpoint is the Successful Navigation and EGM Recording of Each Pre-specified Pulmonary Vein Per Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.

Success was navigating and sensing by obtaining an EGM at the pre-specified targeted PVs. The null hypothesis was to be tested at the α = 0.05 significance level using a test statistic Z based on the Farrington and Manning likelihood score statistic with adjustment to take into account the correlation between multiple observations (PVs) on the same subject. The null hypothesis was to be rejected if Z \> 1.645 or, equivalently, if the corresponding p-value was less than 0.05.

Time frame:
Peri-procedural
Reported as:
Number · Pulmonary Veins
The Primary Effectiveness Endpoint is the Successful Navigation and EGM Recording of Each Pre-specified Pulmonary Vein Per Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.
Pulmonary VeinsManual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso Navigation
The Primary Effectiveness Endpoint is the Successful Navigation and EGM Recording of Each Pre-specified Pulmonary Vein Per Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.167295
Statistical analysis
  • Manual Lasso Navigation vs Vdrive Lasso Navigation · Farrington and Manning · p = 0.0405 (Adjusted to take into account the correlation between multiple PVs on the same subject. The sample estimate of the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated as the Pearson sample correlation coefficient for all pairs of observations.)
PrimarySafety Outcome to be Assessed by Comparing the Rate of Adjudicated Serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of the Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.

The Vdrive will allow physicians to manipulate compatible circular mapping catheters while maintaining a safety profile that is not inferior to manual circular catheter navigation. The one-sided null hypothesis was to be tested at the α = 0.05 significance level using a standard unpooled asymptotically normal test statistic. The null hypothesis was to be rejected if Z \< -1.7046 or, equivalently, if the corresponding p-value was less than 0.05.

Time frame:
7 days Follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
Safety Outcome to be Assessed by Comparing the Rate of Adjudicated Serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of the Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.
participantsManual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso Navigation
Safety Outcome to be Assessed by Comparing the Rate of Adjudicated Serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of the Procedure Between Both the Control and the Investigational Device Groups.13
Statistical analysis
  • Manual Lasso Navigation vs Vdrive Lasso Navigation · Z-statistic · p = .0441

Adverse events

Collected over If an event was reported by a site as a serious adverse event, SAE, and possibly, probably, or definitely related to the device or the procedure, it is included in the tabulation and the analysis of major adverse events through seven (7) day follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Manual Lasso Navigation—1/43 (2.3%)2/43 (4.7%)
Vdrive Lasso Navigation—3/77 (3.9%)6/77 (7.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventManual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso Navigation
DementiaSurgical and medical procedures1/430/77
PseudoaneurysmSurgical and medical procedures0/431/77
Cardiac TamponadeSurgical and medical procedures0/431/77
BleedingSurgical and medical procedures0/431/77
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventManual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso Navigation
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders0/434/77
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders2/430/77
HematomaVascular disorders0/432/77

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Manual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso NavigationTotal
Mean62.8 ± 9.262.4 ± 9.862.6 ± 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Manual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso NavigationTotal
Female91423
Male346397
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Manual Lasso NavigationVdrive Lasso NavigationTotal
Belgium112334
United States203353
Germany122133
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Central Baptist Hospital
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
  • Baylor Research Institute
    Dallas, Texas 75204, United States
  • ZNA Campus Middelheim Lindendreef 1
    Antwerpen, 2020, Belgium
  • IKFE HDZ GbmH
    Bad Oeynhausen, 32545, Germany
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01656772
Lead sponsor
Stereotaxis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2012
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Jun 4, 2015
Last update
Jul 1, 2015

Study contacts

Qun Sha, MD
study director · Stereotaxis Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion