An interventional study of Using Flow measurements to guide fistula angioplasty (Transonics) in End Stage Renal Failure on Dialysis and Renal Failure, sponsored by Richard Lindsay. Terminated at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-27.
Sponsored by Richard Lindsay · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study is to assess whether using a flow measurement device, in this case the Transonics flow device, as an end-point to interventional treatment of diseased dialysis fistulae can help increase immediate treatment success in terms of quality of dialysis immediately following the treatment and increasing time to reintervention.
This is a prospective randomized study. All intervention will be carried out by experienced radiologists in the two study centres.
At least fifty (50) consecutive subjects meeting the eligibility criteria, scheduled for angiographic assessment (with a view to PTA if necessary), will be invited to participate in the study. Subjects who consent will undergo their procedure, which will be performed by a qualified interventional radiology doctor (IRD). Patients will be randomly allocated to each group. All previous Transonics measurements will be available to the treating IRD. A target flow rate will be pre-decided in all patients in consultation with the nephrology service.
1,994 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency; 173 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 43 across 1,503 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency.
Browse Renal Insufficiency studies →Richard Lindsay is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention will be guided by flow through the fistula as guided by Transonics flow measurements
Device: Using Flow measurements to guide fistula angioplasty (Transonics)
Patient will undergo normal fistula intervention guided only by angiographic assessment
Transonics flow measurements in the fistula would be used to guide the fistula intervention
Time to reintervention
Time between intervention and the need for repeat intervention (based on standard dialysis screening systems).
Time frame: 6 months
Effect of treatment on rate of change in Transonics flow measurements
Analysis of Transonics flow measurements obtained post intervention during the follow-up of six months
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, one, two three and 6 months
Change in dialysis efficiency post treatment
Comparison of Dialysis efficiency scores pre and post treatment
Time frame: One month, 2, 3 and six months
Significance of stenoses as detected by Transonics, compared with angiography
Assessment of extent to which using flow measurements can improve ability to detect hemodynamically significant stenoses.
Time frame: 1 day, ie.will be asessed immediately following intial intervention only.
Nature of Procedure using Transonics versus Angiographic assessment
Comparison of procedures carried out between the group where Transonics flow measurements are used to guide intervention, versus the group where angiographic assessment is used.
Time frame: Six months
This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.