CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01635439Updated Feb 6, 2014Results posted

Prostin and Propess in Induction of Labor

A Phase 3 interventional study of Propess and Prostin E2 in Labor Pain, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-06.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two agents used in induction of labor Propess (Controlled release dinoprostone, PGE2, pessary) and Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone vaginal Tablet).

Read the detailed description

A controlled release hydrophilic matrix (Controlled Therapeutics Ltd., East Kilbride, Scotland) which provides a gradual release of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) was introduced in 1995 (Propess, Ferring Pharmaceuticals). This preparation is used for the initiation or enhancement of cervical ripening in women at or after term with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation. Prostaglandin E2 causes softening and dilatation of the cervix and subsequently produces uterine contractions which may induce labour.

02

Conditions studied

  • Labor Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Labor Pain

397 studies on the registry are indexed under Labor Pain; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 100 across 327 interventional studies indexed under Labor Pain.

Browse Labor Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,879 studies on the registry; 424 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Gestational age 37 weeks or more
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cesarean section
  • Any contraindication for vaginal delivery
  • Suspected Cephalo-Pelvic Disproportion
  • Unexplained antepartum Hemorrhage
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Propess

    Propess insert is a preparation of PGE2 packaged in a hydrogel polymer matrix and designed for slow intravaginal release of 10 mg dinoprostone at a rate of 0.3 mg/h.

    Drug: Propess

  • Active comparator
    Prostin E2

    PROSTIN E2 Vaginal Suppository, an oxytocic, contains dinoprostone as the naturally occurring prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)3 mg/suppository.

    Drug: Prostin E2

Interventions

  • DrugPropess

    The vaginal insert is removed 24 h after the application. It is only to be removed earlier in case of the onset of active labour, the rupture of the membranes, or at the occurrence of hyperstimulation.

    Also known as: Intravaginal PGE2 insert

  • DrugProstin E2

    3 mg tab is placed in the posterior vaginal fornix. dose can be repeated every 6 hours till onset of active labour, the rupture of the membranes, or the occurrence of hyper-stimulation.

    Also known as: Dinoprostone (PGE2)vaginal tablets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Induction to Delivery Interval

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Induction to Onset of Labor Interval

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Uterine Hyper-stimulation Rate

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Need for Syntocinon Augmentation

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Normal Vaginal Delivery Rate

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Results

Posted Oct 4, 2012

Participant flow

290 women were assessed for eligibility, 62 women were excluded (35 did not meet the inclusion criteria, 21 declined to participate and 6 refused induction of labor as a method of delivery)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropessProstin E2
Started100100
Completed100100
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryInduction to Delivery Interval
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Induction to Delivery Interval
hoursPropessProstin E2
Induction to Delivery Interval22.3 ± 5.721.2 ± 5.3
SecondaryInduction to Onset of Labor Interval
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Induction to Onset of Labor Interval
hoursPropessProstin E2
Induction to Onset of Labor Interval18.8 ± 5.317.7 ± 5.4
SecondaryUterine Hyper-stimulation Rate
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Number · participants
Uterine Hyper-stimulation Rate
participantsPropessProstin E2
Uterine Hyper-stimulation Rate11
SecondaryNeed for Syntocinon Augmentation
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Number · participants
Need for Syntocinon Augmentation
participantsPropessProstin E2
Need for Syntocinon Augmentation510
SecondaryNormal Vaginal Delivery Rate
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Number · participants
Normal Vaginal Delivery Rate
participantsPropessProstin E2
Normal Vaginal Delivery Rate7985

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propess—1/100 (1%)14/100 (14%)
Prostin E2—2/100 (2%)13/100 (13%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPropessProstin E2
Cord pH < 7.1Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/1002/100
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPropessProstin E2
Maternal adverse outcomesPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions12/10013/100
Uterine tachysystolePregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions2/1003/100
Apgar score < 7Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1001/100

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PropessProstin E2Total
Mean26 ± 4.326.8 ± 5.126.4 ± 4.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PropessProstin E2Total
Female100100200
Male000
Body mass index
Body mass index(kg/m^2)PropessProstin E2Total
Mean23 ± 2.723.5 ± 3.523.3 ± 3.1
Parity
Parity(participants)PropessProstin E2Total
P0444993
P1202343
P2201434
P311819
P4336
P5235
Gestational age
Gestational age(weeks)PropessProstin E2Total
Mean40.6 ± 0.940.4 ± 1.340.5 ± 1.2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NWAFH, North west Armed Forces Hospital
    Tabuk, Box 100 Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Abdelaziz A, Mahmoud AA, Ellaithy MI, Abees SH. Pre-induction cervical ripening using two different dinoprostone vaginal preparations: A randomized clinical trial of tablets and slow release retrievable insert. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;57(4):560-566. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.016. PubMed 30122579 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01635439
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Collaborators
North West Armed Forces Hospital
Responsible party
Mohamed Ellaithy (Lecturer of Obstetrics & Gynecology/ Consultant of Obstetrics & Gynecology AFHSR, Ain Shams University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 9, 2012
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Results posted
Oct 4, 2012
Last update
Feb 6, 2014

Study contacts

Ahmed Abdelaziz, M.D.
principal investigator · North West Armed Forces Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion