CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01628874JTIPUpdated Jun 21, 2019Results posted

Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children

An interventional study of J-Tip and EMLA in Lumbar Puncture and Topical Analgesia, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-21.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to low recruitment numbers, the study was terminated.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a needle-free jet-injection system with 1% buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia for lumbar punctures compared to a topical anesthetic agent. Our hypothesis is: A needle-free jet-injection system (J-Tip) with 1% lidocaine will provide local anesthesia that is comparable to that of a topical anesthetic agent (EMLA cream) when performing lumbar punctures in children.

Read the detailed description

Lumbar punctures are a common procedure performed in children in the emergency department. In febrile infants they are frequently performed as part of a sepsis evaluation, and in older children they are used in the evaluation of possible meningitis, new seizures, altered mental status and other neurologic emergencies.

Several studies in the pediatric emergency medicine literature have found a positive association between lumbar puncture success and the use of local anesthesia in infant lumbar punctures. Despite this data, studies have shown that 70-76% of lumbar punctures in the emergency department are performed without any form of pain management, with up to 95% of infants receiving no form of pain management. Common reasoning for providers to forgo pain management include the time for topical anesthetics to be effective (30-45 minutes), the pain already associated with injectable lidocaine, and obscuring of anatomic landmarks with injectable lidocaine.

A recent development in pain management for pediatric procedures is the use of needle-free jet injection of lidocaine. One such device is the J-Tip, which uses a compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) cartridge to deliver medication to the subcutaneous tissues to a depth of 5-8 mm in 0.2 seconds. It has been shown to be largely pain-free for children. Multiple studies have shown it to be effective in reducing pain associated with peripheral IV placement in children. The J-Tip has recently been approved for peripheral IV starts in the Children's Hospital Colorado emergency department.

Some hospitals anecdotally report using the device for lumbar punctures, but to date no randomized studies have evaluated its effectiveness in pain management compared to other methods. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the J-Tip in lumbar punctures. It offers the advantage of providing much faster anesthesia compared to topical creams, yet does not require the initial skin puncture of injectable lidocaine. If a rapid form of local anesthesia is available, it may increase the overall use of local anesthesia and improve pain management in the pediatric population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Puncture
  • Topical Analgesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lumbar Puncture
  • J-Tip
  • Jet injection
  • Local Analgesia
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is above the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≤4 months or 4-18 years
  • ability to report VAS for patients 4-18 years
  • require lumbar puncture as part of their clinical care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ages 5-47 months
  • developmental delay or inability to complete VAS in older patients
  • allergy to lidocaine
  • requirement of sedation for procedure
  • pre-procedural analgesia treatment except for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine Injection

    0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine injection given with the J-Tip

    Device: J-Tip · Drug: EMLA · Drug: Lidocaine

  • Active comparator
    lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA) Cream

    Patients in this arm will receive 1g EMLA cream if they are in the younger age group and 10g EMLA cream if they are in the older age group. This will be placed for a minimum of 30 minutes.

    Device: J-Tip · Drug: EMLA · Drug: Lidocaine

Interventions

  • DeviceJ-Tip

    Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.

    Also known as: Needle-free jet-injection system

  • DrugEMLA

    In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.

    Also known as: EMLA Cream

  • DrugLidocaine

    5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.

    Time frame: Immediately Post-Procedure

  2. Pain Score

    The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.

    Time frame: At Needle Insertion

  3. Pain Score

    The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.

    Time frame: At time J-TIP is used

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success

    The success of lumbar puncture was defined as obtaining Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first attempt and \<1000 Red Blood Cells/millimeter cubed

    Time frame: Immediately following lumbar puncture

  2. Change in Heart Rate

    Heart rate was measured at 5 points in time (pre-procedure, application of J-Tip, at LP needle insertion, while the needle is in place, and post-procedure) and was compared for significant differences

    Time frame: At 5 specific points during the procedure

07

Results

Posted Jun 21, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Low enrollment leading to small number of subjects analyzed; Low enrollment of older age range (4 years-18 years) leading to termination of that study arm prior to analysis (6 subjects excluded from analysis, no data for VAS collected).

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip
Started3432
Completed2929
Not completed53
Withdrew: Physician decision11
Withdrew: Age >4 months42

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Score

The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.

Time frame:
Immediately Post-Procedure
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pain Score
score on a scaleEMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip
Pain Score0 (0 to 0.5)0 (0 to 0)
PrimaryPain Score

The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.

Time frame:
At Needle Insertion
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pain Score
score on a scaleEMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip
Pain Score5 (5 to 5)5 (4 to 5)
PrimaryPain Score

The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.

Time frame:
At time J-TIP is used
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pain Score
score on a scaleEMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip
Pain Score5 (5 to 5)5 (5 to 5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success

The success of lumbar puncture was defined as obtaining Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first attempt and \<1000 Red Blood Cells/millimeter cubed

Time frame:
Immediately following lumbar puncture
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success
ParticipantsEMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip
Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success816
SecondaryChange in Heart Rate

Heart rate was measured at 5 points in time (pre-procedure, application of J-Tip, at LP needle insertion, while the needle is in place, and post-procedure) and was compared for significant differences

Time frame:
At 5 specific points during the procedure
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per Minute
Change in Heart Rate
Beats per MinuteEMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip
Pre-procedure154 ± 40156 ± 28
J-Tip application160 ± 37167 ± 29
Needle insertion170 ± 49169 ± 35
Needle in place172 ± 54178 ± 40
Post-procedure157 ± 30159 ± 26

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-Tip—0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)
Placebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-Tip—0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(days)EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-TipTotal
Median30 (19 to 48)41 (28 to 50)35.5 (20 to 51.5)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-TipTotal
Female121022
Male171936
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-TipTotal
Hispanic or Latino101121
Not Hispanic or Latino191837
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)EMLA Cream, Then Placebo Via J-TipPlacebo Cream, Then Lidocaine Via J-TipTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American178
White201636
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported7411
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 May;26(5):357-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181db2026. PubMed 20404782 ↗
  • Baxter AL, Welch JC, Burke BL, Isaacman DJ. Pain, position, and stylet styles: infant lumbar puncture practices of pediatric emergency attending physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):816-20. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148030.99339.fe. PubMed 15572969 ↗
  • Spanos S, Booth R, Koenig H, Sikes K, Gracely E, Kim IK. Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):511-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816a8d5b. PubMed 18645542 ↗
  • Quinn M, Carraccio C, Sacchetti A. Pain, punctures, and pediatricians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993 Feb;9(1):12-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199302000-00005. No abstract available. PubMed 8488137 ↗
  • Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1168-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1609. Epub 2010 Oct 4. PubMed 20921070 ↗
  • Baxter AL, Fisher RG, Burke BL, Goldblatt SS, Isaacman DJ, Lawson ML. Local anesthetic and stylet styles: factors associated with resident lumbar puncture success. Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):876-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0519. Erratum In: Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1870. PubMed 16510670 ↗
  • Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):28-31. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111517. PubMed 11145767 ↗
  • Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23. PubMed 17321005 ↗
  • Jimenez N, Bradford H, Seidel KD, Sousa M, Lynn AM. A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):411-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194293.10549.62. PubMed 16428534 ↗
  • Kaur G, Gupta P, Kumar A. A randomized trial of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics during lumbar puncture in newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1065-70. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1065. PubMed 14609894 ↗
  • Rushforth JA, Levene MI. Behavioural response to pain in healthy neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F174-6. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.3.f174. PubMed 8198409 ↗
  • Grunau RVE, Craig KD. Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain. 1987 Mar;28(3):395-410. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90073-X. PubMed 3574966 ↗
  • Caltagirone R, Raghavan VR, Adelgais K, Roosevelt GE. A Randomized Double Blind Trial of Needle-free Injected Lidocaine Versus Topical Anesthesia for Infant Lumbar Puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):310-316. doi: 10.1111/acem.13351. Epub 2017 Dec 26. PubMed 29160002 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01628874
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2012
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Results posted
Jun 21, 2019
Last update
Jun 21, 2019

Study contacts

Ryan Caltagirone, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver
Kathleen Adelgais, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion