CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01624311Updated Jun 1, 2015

Pilot Study For Hypothermia Treatment In Hyperammonemic Encephalopathy In Neonates And Very Young Infants

A Phase 2 interventional study of Therapeutic Hypothermia and Standard of Care Therapy in Urea Cycle Disorders and Organic Acidemias, sponsored by Uta Lichter-Konecki. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 30 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-01.

Sponsored by Uta Lichter-Konecki · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
1 Day to 30 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a pilot study which will test the safety and feasibility of hypothermia treatment as adjunct therapy to conventional treatment of hyperammonemic encephalopathy (HAE) in neonates versus conventional treatment (dialysis, nutritional therapy, and ammonia scavenging drugs) only. The endpoint of the pilot study will be reached when either 24 patients have been enrolled and no serious adverse events were observed, when no patient has been enrolled in 5 years, or when serious adverse events occur which are clearly linked to the use of hypothermia. These would be serious complications not seen in patients on conventional therapy (dialysis , nutritional therapy, ammonia scavenging drugs) for HAE.

Read the detailed description

Children with neonatal onset Urea Cycle Disorders or Organic Acidemias develop hyperammonemia (high ammonia levels) and fall into coma often causing brain damage. For these children to be able to benefit maximally from available long-term treatment and solid organ transplant, outcome of the neonatal onset crisis must be improved. Animal experiments and small clinical trials have indicated that hypothermia protects the brain during hyperammonemia. This pilot study investigates whether adjunct hypothermia therapy in addition to standard of care treatment is feasible and safe in babies with high ammonia levels in coma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urea Cycle Disorders
  • Organic Acidemias

Keywords

  • High ammonia level
  • Hyperammonemia
  • Poor suck
  • Lethargy
  • Coma
  • Encephalopathy
  • Seizures
  • Brain edema
  • Urea Cycle Disorder
  • Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency
  • Carbamoyl Phosphate Synthetase Deficiency
  • Citrullinemia
  • Argininosuccinic Aciduria
  • Organic Acidemia
  • Propionic Aciduria
  • Methylmalonic Aciduria
  • Isovaleric Aciduria
03

In context

Brain Diseases

758 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Diseases; 202 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 58 across 454 interventional studies indexed under Brain Diseases.

Browse Brain Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Uta Lichter-Konecki as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 30 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Newborns >36 wks gestation and ≥2200g birth weight without co-morbidity (see exclusion criteria) that have clinical signs and symptoms of an Urea Cycle Disorders or Propionic , Methylmalonic, or Isovaleric acidemia and hyperammonemia and encephalopathy requiring renal replacement therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hyperammonemia that have clinical signs and symptoms of lysinuric protein intolerance, mitochondrial disorders, congenital lactic acidosis, and fatty acid oxidation disorders, patients with rare and unrelated serious comorbidities and other genetic diseases, e.g., Down syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage in the newborn period, traumatic brain injury, and low birth weight (\<2,200 g at >36 wks gestation).
  • Infants in extremis for which no additional intensive therapy will be offered by the attending neonatologist.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adjunct Hypothermia Arm

    Patients that receive adjunct therapeutic hypothermia in addition to standard of care therapy

    Other: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Other
    Historic Controls

    Patients that were treated with standard of care therapy for the same conditions at the sponsoring institution over the past 10 years.

    Other: Standard of Care Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherTherapeutic Hypothermia

    After obtaining written consent, patients are cooled to 33.5°C (+/- 1°C ) for 72 hours and and then rewarmed by 0.5°C per every 3 hours over 18 hours.

    Also known as: Hypothermia, Hypothermia Therapy, Cooling

  • OtherStandard of Care Therapy

    Patients with hyperammonemia and encephalopathy requiring renal replacement therapy due to a urea cycle disorder or organic acidemia that were treated at Children's National Medical Center over the past 10 years.

    Also known as: Dialysis, Hemodialysis, CVVH, CVVHD

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with unexpected Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    The DSMB meets within 3 weeks of each case, no later than 5 weeks after initiation of hypothermia therapy and assesses the safety and feasibility of adjunct hypothermia treatment in this patient group. The treatment of neonates and very young infants in hyperammonemic coma is very complex and adding hypothermia therapy to this treatment could not be feasible, the pilot study therefore also assesses the feasibility of adding hypothermia therapy to the standard of care treatment.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks

  2. Feasibility of hypothermia therapy as adjunct therapy to the complex standard of care therapy

    The standard of care therapy is very complex. It includes renal replacement therapy, metabolic diet intervention, and ammonia scavenger use. The pilot study will assess primarily for the first 72 hours of treatment and secondarily for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks, whether adding hypothermia to this already complex treatment is feasible.

    Time frame: During the first 72h of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to normalization of ammonia level

    One of the effects of hypothermia treatment is an overall slowing of metabolism which should cause less ammonia to be produced. If this is correct this should lead to a faster normalization of the ammonia level by renal replacement therapy.

    Time frame: During the first 72 hours of treatment

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Columbia University, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
    New York, New York 10027, United States
  • Medical College Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01624311
Lead sponsor
Uta Lichter-Konecki
Collaborators
Children's National Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin
Responsible party
Uta Lichter-Konecki (MD, Columbia University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2012
Start date
Aug 2007
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2015
Last update
Jun 1, 2015

Study contacts

Uta Lichter-Konecki, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion