ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01624220Updated May 12, 2026Results posted

A Prospective Study Using Implanted Fiducial Markers to Assess Treatment Accuracy and Esophageal Toxicity in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

An interventional study of Spinal SBRT (Standard Dose) and Spinal SBRT (Higher Dose) in Spinal Tumor, sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the first part of this clinical research study is to learn how to deliver more accurate radiation treatment of tumors in the spine. Researchers also want to learn how internal organs might move during radiation treatment.

The goal of the second part of this study is to learn if it is safe to allow slightly more radiation to the normal esophagus when spinal tumors close by are being treated. This may result in better tumor control.

Read the detailed description

Study Groups:

If you are found to be eligible to take part in this study, you will be assigned to a study group based on when you join this study. Up to 3 groups of 10 participants will be enrolled in the first part of the study, and up to 2 groups of 10 participants will be enrolled in the second part of the study. Only participants who will receive a single spinal SBRT treatment are eligible for the second part of the study.

The participants in the first part of the study will receive standard doses of radiation therapy to normal organs while treating the tumor. In the second part of the study, each new group will receive a higher dose of radiation to the esophagus than the group before it, if no intolerable side effects were seen.

Radiation Planning and Treatment:

Before starting radiation treatment, you will be asked to complete a questionnaire about any symptoms you might be having and any drugs that you are taking. It should take about 10 minutes to complete. After treatment, you will be given copies of the questionnaire to take with you, and asked to fill it out 1 time a week for the next 4 weeks. You should return the questionnaires by mail. Self-addressed stamped envelopes will be given to you.

During all radiation treatments, the images that are taken during your treatment will be closely analyzed after treatment is over. You will have 1 to 3 radiation treatment sessions depending on your doctor's decision.

If you are in the second part of the study, you will receive slightly more radiation than usual to the normal esophagus.

The rest of your radiation treatment planning and treatment delivery appointments will be unchanged. The dose given to the tumor and number of treatments you receive will be determined by your doctor, and is not affected by taking part in this study.

Follow-Up Visits:

After your radiation treatment schedule ends, you will return for follow-up visits at the following time points:

  • At 3 months
  • Then, every 3 months for 1 year
  • Every 6 months during year 2, and then
  • 1 time a year after that, for as long as possible

Additional follow up visits may be scheduled, if your doctor thinks they are needed.

At these visits, the following tests and procedures will be performed:

  • Any updates to your medical history will be recorded and you will be asked about any side effects you may be having.
  • Your performance status will be recorded.
  • Your completed symptom questionnaires will be reviewed.
  • You will have a physical, including measurement of your vital signs
  • You will have a neurological exam.
  • You will have follow-up imaging (such as an MRI) to check the status of the disease.

This is an investigational study. Radiation therapy is delivered using FDA-approved and commercially available methods. It is considered investigational to give increased radiation to the esophagus.

Up to 57 patients will take part in this study. All will be enrolled at MD Anderson.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Tumor

Keywords

  • Spinal tumor
  • Tumor of the mid or lower spine
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Breast cancer
  • Prostate cancer
  • Renal cell cancer
  • Melanoma
  • Gastrointestinal cancer
  • Sarcoma
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Head and neck primary cancer
  • Carcinoma of unknown primary
  • Fiducial markers
  • Gold seed markers
  • Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy
  • Spinal SBRT
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy
03

In context

Spinal Cord Neoplasms

105 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Neoplasms; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 50 across 69 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Neoplasms.

Browse Spinal Cord Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 3,047 studies on the registry; 578 are open to participants now.

Of its 612 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 409 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. STAGE 1: >/= 18 years old
  2. STAGE 1: confirmed diagnosis of cancer, including, but not limited to non-small cell lung cancer, breast, prostate, renal cell, melanoma, gastrointestinal, sarcoma, thyroid, head and neck primary, and carcinoma of unknown primary
  3. STAGE 1: Signed
  4. STAGE 2: 1-3 above, and Patients undergoing single fraction spinal SBRT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. STAGE 1: Patient with radiosensitive histologies (lymphoma, multiple myeloma, small cell carcinomas, germ cell tumors)
  2. STAGE 1: Extensive (> 50%) height loss of the involved vertebral body
  3. STAGE 1: Inability to tolerate lying flat on treatment table for greater than 30 minutes
  4. STAGE 1: Pregnancy
  5. STAGE 2: Prior irradiation of the spine site and level to be treated
  6. STAGE 2: Patients with primary disease arising in the posterior elements of the VB in question
  7. STAGE 2: History of Barrett's esophagus, esophageal webbing, stricture, or fistula
  8. STAGE 2: Prior radiation to the esophagus
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hypofractionated Radiation

    All patients receive CT-guided spinal SBRT using IMRT to maximize conformality of treatment plan to target volume, while sparing normal structures. Dose given to tumor and number of treatments received determined by patient's doctor. In second stage, characterize tolerance of esophagus to hypofractionated radiation doses through prospective constraint relaxation and toxicity monitoring. Data collected from Group 1 in first stage will give data on dose delivered to esophagus. Second stage of protocol will begin accrual once Group 1 has filled. Dose constraints used for Groups 3 allow higher dose. Dose constraints for Group 4 represent modest increase of esophageal dose maximums.

    Radiation: Spinal SBRT (Higher Dose) · Procedure: Gold Seed Implantation · Behavioral: Questionnaires

  • Experimental
    ExacTrac Positioning System

    Analysis performed of ExacTrac positioning system with and without fiducial guidance. Four dimensional CT datasets for simulation will allow use of data from this portion of protocol to characterize degree to which organ at risk (OAR) motion is relevant at each spinal level. 20 patients accrued in two groups of 10, with 10 patients in each rostral-caudal position in the spine (Group 1: T4-T12, Group 2: L1-L5). Imaging done with fiducial markers for this study will not impact patient management. Patients will treated with standard dose constraints to normal tissues.

    Radiation: Spinal SBRT (Standard Dose) · Procedure: Gold Seed Implantation · Behavioral: Questionnaires

Interventions

  • RadiationSpinal SBRT (Standard Dose)

    Group 1 and 2: Standard doses of radiation therapy to the normal esophagus while treating the tumor. Up to 2 groups of 10 participants enrolled.

    Also known as: XRT

  • RadiationSpinal SBRT (Higher Dose)

    Group 3 and 4: Higher dose of radiation to esophagus than group before it, if no intolerable side effects were seen. 2 groups of 10 participants enrolled in the second part of study. Only participants who will receive a single spinal SBRT treatment are eligible for second part of study.

    Also known as: XRT

  • ProcedureGold Seed Implantation

    4 gold seeds implanted into bones of spine: 2 gold seeds above and 2 gold seeds below the area of tumor to be treated.

    Also known as: Fiducial implantation

  • BehavioralQuestionnaires

    Completion of questionnaire before radiation treatment starts, and 1 time a week for the next 4 weeks. It should take about 10 minutes to complete.

    Also known as: Surveys

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Response at Protocol Treatment Site

    Patients will be monitored at each follow-up visit, with MRI of the spine performed at each follow-up time point during the first year. Treated lesions will be classified as progressive (defined as \> 25% increased volume), stable (defined as radiographically unchanged), or smaller, and spinal tumor progression-free survival (PFS) will be calculated.

    Time frame: 10 years and 9.5 months

07

Results

Posted May 12, 2026

Participant flow

A total of 41 patient enrolled to this study from Aug 3, 2012 to Jun 1, 2015. Stage 1 in 38 patient and stage 2 in 3 patients

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStage 1Stage 2
Started383
Completed353
Not completed30
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject30

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Response at Protocol Treatment Site

Patients will be monitored at each follow-up visit, with MRI of the spine performed at each follow-up time point during the first year. Treated lesions will be classified as progressive (defined as \> 25% increased volume), stable (defined as radiographically unchanged), or smaller, and spinal tumor progression-free survival (PFS) will be calculated.

Time frame:
10 years and 9.5 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Response at Protocol Treatment Site
ParticipantsStage 1Stage 2
Stable disease232
Progression disease70
Unknown81

Adverse events

Collected over From date of protocol registration until the date of documented development of AEs in both treatment groups (sate 1 and Stage 2), assessed in every visit, approximately 3 years and 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stage 118/38 (47.4%)0/38 (0%)10/38 (26.3%)
Stage 21/3 (33.3%)0/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStage 1Stage 2
Chest pain, abdominal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/381/3
FeverGeneral disorders2/380/3
painNervous system disorders2/380/3
weakness / DC diagnoses: new epidural diseaseMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/380/3
Cathecholamine excess (causing severe swings in BP and obstipation)Metabolism and nutrition disorders1/380/3
Failure to thriveGastrointestinal disorders1/380/3
Foot dropMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/380/3
GI bleedGastrointestinal disorders1/380/3
HemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/380/3

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Stage 1Stage 2Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years24226
>=65 years14115
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stage 1Stage 2Total
Female17118
Male21223
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stage 1Stage 2Total
Hispanic or Latino516
Not Hispanic or Latino10212
Unknown or Not Reported23023
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stage 1Stage 2Total
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American202
White29231
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported415
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Stage 1Stage 2Total
United States38341
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01624220
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 20, 2012
Start date
Aug 3, 2012
Primary completion
Apr 14, 2023
Completion
Apr 14, 2023
Results posted
May 12, 2026
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

Amol J. Ghia, MD
principal investigator · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion