CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01618253Updated Sep 5, 2013

Radiation Therapy With Sorafenib for TACE-Resistant Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 1 interventional study of Sorafenib and Conventional fractionation (2 Gy per day) external beam radiation therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Hepatocellular Cancer and Hepatoma, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-09-05.

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Closed due to poor accrual.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine the maximum tolerated radiation dose with concurrent sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that has not responded to transarterial chemoembolization.

Read the detailed description

In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is first line therapy. Non-responders to TACE (i.e. stable or progressive disease) represent a poor prognosis population with limited options. Sorafenib is indicated for first line salvage therapy, however it only improves survival 2-3 months and just has a 2-3% response rate. Thus, sorafenib is merely a cytostatic agent that delays progression and does not cytoreduce disease.

Radiation therapy (RT) is a non-invasive treatment that can cytoreduce HCC with minimal morbidity using modern techniques. A meta-analysis and multiple retrospective series suggest TACE + RT improve survival when compared to TACE alone. Higher RT doses are similarly associated with increased survival due to improved local control. Paradoxically, some series suggest that RT can induce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression which may stimulate HCC.

Pre-clinical data suggest that combining RT with concurrent sorafenib (a VEGF inhibitor) improves tumor control. However, clinical data is limited to case reports and safety has not been well characterized. Prior to determining if this combination can improve control of HCC in this poor prognosis population, the optimal radiation dose with concurrent sorafenib must be determined by a phase I dose escalation trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Hepatocellular Cancer
  • Hepatoma
  • Liver Cancer

Keywords

  • Transarterial Chemoembolization
  • TACE
  • Sorafenib Tosylate
  • Sorafenib
  • Nexavar
  • External Beam Radiation Therapy
  • Radiation Therapy
  • Radiotherapy
  • Radiation
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 540 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.

Of its 71 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Radiographic or histologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
  • Maximum of 3 HCC lesions within the liver.
  • No evidence of lymphadenopathy or metastatic disease per either CT or PET.
  • Prior transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE) at least 28 days prior to initiation of protocol therapy.
  • Evidence of either progressive disease or stable disease following TACE.
  • Child Pugh Class A (score 5-6) or B (score 7).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤1 (or Karnofsky ≥70%).
  • Normal organ and marrow function (platelets >60,000/mc; hemoglobin ≥8.5 g/dL; international normalized ratio (INR) ≤2.3; albumin ≥2.8 g/dL; total bilirubin ≤3 mg/dL; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) / alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \<5x upper limit of normal; creatinine ≤1.5x upper limit of normal).
  • Negative human immunodeficiency virus serology.
  • Negative pregnancy test for women of child bearing age.
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 800 cc of normal liver.
  • Child Pugh Class B (score 8-9) or C (score 10-15).
  • Acute/active hepatitis B infection.
  • Prior systemic chemotherapy or abdominal radiation therapy.
  • Portal venous (main, primary right, or primary left trunks) or inferior vena cava thrombosis.
  • Prior malignancy within 5 years of enrollment except for non-melanoma skin cancer.
  • Prior history of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or esophageal variceal bleed in the last 6 months.
  • Pre-existing heart failure with either a clinical classification of New York Heart Association Class III or IV or cardiac ejection fraction of \<45%.
  • Systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg or diastolic pressure > 100 mmHg despite optimal medical management.
  • Pulmonary hemorrhage or other serious bleeding event (grade 2+) within 4 weeks initiation of protocol therapy.
  • Prior history of scleroderma or active systemic lupus erythematosus.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiation therapy with concurrent sorafenib

    Drug: Sorafenib · Radiation: Conventional fractionation (2 Gy per day) external beam radiation therapy

Interventions

  • DrugSorafenib

    Sorafenib 400 mg PO bid will be started two weeks prior to initiation of radiation therapy (RT) and continue until the end of protocol specified radiation dose.

    Also known as: Sorafenib Tosylate, Nexavar

  • RadiationConventional fractionation (2 Gy per day) external beam radiation therapy

    Patients will be stratified by the maximum diameter of HCC in any plane (≤10 cm or \>10 cm) based on post-TACE, contrast enhanced MRI or CT. If only 1 lesion is present, the maximum diameter of that lesion in any plane determines stratification. If \>1 but ≤3 lesions are present, the sum of the maximum diameter in any plane of all the lesions determines stratification. The MTD will be determined utilizing a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme (4 Gy increase per bin). For lesions ≤10 cm, the starting RT dose bin will be 42 Gy and escalate to a pre-determined maximum of 62 Gy if no DLT's are experienced. For lesions \>10 cm, the starting RT dose bin will be 40 Gy and escalate to a pre-determined maximum of 52 Gy if no DLT's are experienced.

    Also known as: External Beam Radiation Therapy, Radiation Therapy, Radiotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose

    Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined by dose limiting toxicity (DLT) that is observed in either the acute (during treatment) or subacute (up to 3 months after treatment) setting. Acute DLT will be defined by grade 3-5 hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, hematologic, or pulmonary toxicity per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), v4.0. Subacute DLT will be defined by radiation induced liver disease (RILD) or grade 3-5 gastrointestinal, hematologic, or pulmonary toxicity per CTCAE, v4.0.

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until 3 months after completion of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiographic Response

    Evaluated by either contrast enhanced MRI (preferred) or CT.

    Time frame: 1 & 3 months post-treatment.

  2. Patterns of Failure

    Classified as local (in-field), regional (intrahepatic out-of-field), or distant (extrahepatic, which includes porta hepatic lymph nodes).

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of first documented progression, last known folow-up, or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 years.

  3. Progression Free Survival

    From date of enrollment until first local, regional, or distant failure following RT, last follow-up, or death from any cause.

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of first documented progression, last known folow-up, or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 years.

  4. Overall Survival

    From date of enrollment until last follow-up or death.

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of last known folow-up or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 years.

  5. Health Related Quality of Life

    FACT-Hep survey will be utilized to establish pre-treatment baseline and then compared to post-treatment evaluations at months 1, 2, and 3.

    Time frame: 1, 2, & 3 months post-treatment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chung YL, Jian JJ, Cheng SH, Tsai SY, Chuang VP, Soong T, Lin YM, Horng CF. Sublethal irradiation induces vascular endothelial growth factor and promotes growth of hepatoma cells: implications for radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 May 1;12(9):2706-15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2721. PubMed 16675562 ↗
  • Plastaras JP, Kim SH, Liu YY, Dicker DT, Dorsey JF, McDonough J, Cerniglia G, Rajendran RR, Gupta A, Rustgi AK, Diehl JA, Smith CD, Flaherty KT, El-Deiry WS. Cell cycle dependent and schedule-dependent antitumor effects of sorafenib combined with radiation. Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 1;67(19):9443-54. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1473. PubMed 17909054 ↗
  • Ren ZG, Zhao JD, Gu K, Chen Z, Lin JH, Xu ZY, Hu WG, Zhou ZH, Liu LM, Jiang GL. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an irradiation dose escalation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 1;79(2):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.070. Epub 2010 Apr 24. PubMed 20421145 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01618253
Lead sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 13, 2012
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 5, 2013

Study contacts

Beth A. Erickson-Wittmann, M.D.
principal investigator · Medical College of Wisconsin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion