CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01593917Updated Feb 11, 2025Results posted

Trifecta™ Long Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

An observational study in Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Regurgitation and Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Completed at 11 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-11.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
329
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Trifecta™ LTFU Study is a single-arm, multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, post-market study conducted in the United States and Canada to collect long-term safety and effectiveness data through 10 years after implant of the Trifecta™ aortic bioprosthetic valve. The Trifecta™ is a tri-leaflet stented pericardial valve designed for supraannular placement in the aortic position. The Trifecta™ LTFU Study is an extension of the Trifecta™ Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Study (NCT00475709) conducted to support United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Trifecta™ valve. All Trifecta™ LTFU Study subjects received Trifecta™ valve implants during participation in the Trifecta™ IDE study and subsequently consented to extended annual follow-up through 10 years under the Trifecta™ LTFU protocol.

Read the detailed description

This clinical study was designed as an extension of the Trifecta™ IDE Study supporting FDA approval of the Trifecta™ valve. A total of 11 Trifecta™ IDE Study investigational sites in the United States (n=9) and Canada (n=2) participated in the Trifecta™ LTFU Study. Study enrollment included 329 subjects implanted from 2007 through 2009 at these 11 sites during the IDE Study who consented to participate in continued annual follow-up through 10 years post-implant. Of these 329 subjects, 140 also participated in the FDA-mandated Trifecta™ Post-Approval Study (PAS, NCT01514162) prior to consenting to additional annual follow-up under the Trifecta™ LTFU protocol. The remaining 189 subjects entered the Trifecta™ LTFU Study directly from the Trifecta™ IDE Study.

The Trifecta™ LTFU Study database subsumes all data collected in the 329 participants under the Trifecta™ IDE and Trifecta™ PAS protocols and extends these data through 10 years from each subject's original date of implant in the Trifecta™ IDE Study. The Trifecta™ LTFU Study data thus encompass 10 years of continuous annual post-implant follow-up in the 329 participants as well as their pre-implant Baseline Visit data. Data collected includes adverse events, assessments of heart failure symptoms by New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and echocardiographic assessments of Trifecta™ valve function.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency
  • Aortic Valve Regurgitation
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Aortic Valve Incompetence

Keywords

  • Aortic valve
  • Heart valve
  • Tissue valve
  • Bioprosthesis
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 282 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 329 is above the median of 200 across 424 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices is the lead sponsor of 525 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects previously implanted with a Trifecta prosthetic valve

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient currently has a Trifecta™ aortic valve that was implanted at one of the U.S. or Canadian investigational sites during the Trifecta™ IDE study.
  2. Patient met eligibility criteria prior to enrollment in the Trifecta™ IDE study.
  3. Patient agrees to complete all required follow-up visits.
  4. Patient provided written informed consent prior to any study related procedure, as approved by the governing Institutional Review Board (IRB) or the Ethics Committee (EC) of the investigational site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is currently participating or planning to participate in any other study unless approved by the Sponsor.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
329 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Subjects previously implanted with a Trifecta™ valve in the Trifecta™ IDE Study

    Subjects enrolled in this clinical study were implanted with the Trifecta™ aortic bioprosthetic valve during 2007, 2008 and 2009 as part of the Trifecta™ IDE Study conducted to obtain FDA approval.

    Device: Trifecta™ Valve

Interventions

  • DeviceTrifecta™ Valve

    Aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta™ aortic bioprosthesis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Reoperation for Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant

    Percentage of participants free from surgical explant or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for treatment of structural deterioration of the Trifecta™ valve through 10 years post-implant. This percentage is estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Structural valve deterioration is deterioration intrinsic to the bioprosthetic valve, due to leaflet calcification, leaflet tears, or other causes, that results in prosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation.

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant

    Percentage of participants free of death from any cause through 10 years after implant with the Trifecta™ valve, estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

  2. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Valve-Related Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant

    Percentage of participants free from death related to the Trifecta™ valve through 10 years after implant, estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Valve-related mortality includes deaths due to any of the following events involving the study valve: structural valvular deterioration, nonstructural valve dysfunction, valve thrombosis, embolism, bleeding events, endocarditis, or reoperation. Sudden, unexplained deaths of participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve are also counted as valve-related mortality.

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

  3. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant

    Percentage of participants free of structural deterioration of the Trifecta valve through 10 years after implant, estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Structural valve deterioration is deterioration intrinsic to the bioprosthetic valve, due to leaflet calcification, leaflet tears, or other causes, that results in prosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation. The presence of structural valve deterioration is determined by direct visualization of the valve at explant or autopsy or by echocardiographic or other cardiac imaging criteria for assessment of valvular stenosis and regurgitation.

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Late Adverse Events Per 100 Patient-Years of Follow-up

    Late adverse events are defined those occurring from 31 days through 10 years post-implant. This outcome measure is calculated by dividing the number of late adverse events of each type by the total number of patient-years of follow-up accumulated from 31 days through 10 years post-implant, expressed in hundreds of years.

    Time frame: 31 days through 10 years post-implant

  2. Participants' Average Mean Transvalvular Gradient at 10 Years Post-implant by Valve Size

    Average of participants' mean aortic transvalvular pressure gradient measured by echocardiography at 10 years post-implant. Averages are reported for each valve size separately. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient is the mean difference in pressure between the inlet side and outlet side of the aortic valve during systole, measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

  3. Participants' Mean Aortic Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement at 10 Years Post-Implant by Valve Size

    Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve estimated by echocardiography. Mean EOA in square centimeters is reported separately for each valve size.

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

  4. Number of Participants by Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Grade at 10 Years Post-Implant

    Regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve does not fully seal, allowing backflow of blood through the closed valve. The amount of aortic regurgitation in this study was graded as none, trivial, mild, moderate or severe by echocardiographic assessment. Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation can cause symptoms of heart failure, such as fatigue, shortness of breath and exercise intolerance.

    Time frame: 10 years post-implant

  5. Number of Participants by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class, Preoperatively and at 10 Years Post-Implant

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates heart failure symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

    Time frame: Preoperative through 10 years

07

Results

Posted Feb 1, 2021

Participant flow

A total of 329 subjects were enrolled into the Trifecta™ Long Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study at 11 sites in the United States and Canada. All 329 subjects had received Trifecta™ implants in 2007, 2008 and 2009 during their participation in the Trifecta™ Investigational Device Exemption Study (IDE) Study (NCT00475709). Trifecta™ LTFU study enrollments occurred between 02 July, 2012 and 27 March, 2017. The final 10-years post-Trifecta™-implant follow-up visit was completed on 26 September, 2019.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Started329
Completed159
Not completed170
Withdrew: Death67
Withdrew: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) or surgical explant60
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject23
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12
Withdrew: Protocol violation5
Withdrew: Physician decision3

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Reoperation for Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant

Percentage of participants free from surgical explant or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for treatment of structural deterioration of the Trifecta™ valve through 10 years post-implant. This percentage is estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Structural valve deterioration is deterioration intrinsic to the bioprosthetic valve, due to leaflet calcification, leaflet tears, or other causes, that results in prosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation.

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Reoperation for Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant
Percentage of ParticipantsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Reoperation for Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant75.7 (70.0 to 80.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant

Percentage of participants free of death from any cause through 10 years after implant with the Trifecta™ valve, estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant
Percentage of ParticipantsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From All-Cause Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant77.1 (71.6 to 81.6)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Valve-Related Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant

Percentage of participants free from death related to the Trifecta™ valve through 10 years after implant, estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Valve-related mortality includes deaths due to any of the following events involving the study valve: structural valvular deterioration, nonstructural valve dysfunction, valve thrombosis, embolism, bleeding events, endocarditis, or reoperation. Sudden, unexplained deaths of participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve are also counted as valve-related mortality.

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Valve-Related Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant
Percentage of ParticipantsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Valve-Related Mortality at 10 Years Post-Implant98.4 (95.7 to 99.4)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant

Percentage of participants free of structural deterioration of the Trifecta valve through 10 years after implant, estimated from time-to-event data using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Structural valve deterioration is deterioration intrinsic to the bioprosthetic valve, due to leaflet calcification, leaflet tears, or other causes, that results in prosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation. The presence of structural valve deterioration is determined by direct visualization of the valve at explant or autopsy or by echocardiographic or other cardiac imaging criteria for assessment of valvular stenosis and regurgitation.

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant
Percentage of ParticipantsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration at 10 Years Post-Implant68.4 (62.1 to 73.8)
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Late Adverse Events Per 100 Patient-Years of Follow-up

Late adverse events are defined those occurring from 31 days through 10 years post-implant. This outcome measure is calculated by dividing the number of late adverse events of each type by the total number of patient-years of follow-up accumulated from 31 days through 10 years post-implant, expressed in hundreds of years.

Time frame:
31 days through 10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Number of events per 100 patient-years
Number of Late Adverse Events Per 100 Patient-Years of Follow-up
Number of events per 100 patient-yearsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
All-Cause Mortality2.34
Valve-Related Mortality0.17
Structural Valve Deterioration (SVD)2.93
Reoperation for SVD (surgical explant or transcatheter valve-in-valve implant)2.27
Thromboembolism0.52
Valve Thrombosis0.03
Major Bleeding1.05
Major Paravalvular Leak0.00
Endocarditis0.17
Other pre-specifiedParticipants' Average Mean Transvalvular Gradient at 10 Years Post-implant by Valve Size

Average of participants' mean aortic transvalvular pressure gradient measured by echocardiography at 10 years post-implant. Averages are reported for each valve size separately. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient is the mean difference in pressure between the inlet side and outlet side of the aortic valve during systole, measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Participants' Average Mean Transvalvular Gradient at 10 Years Post-implant by Valve Size
mmHgSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
19 mm24.9 ± 12.4
21 mm17.7 ± 8.3
23 mm16.0 ± 9.1
25 mm13.2 ± 12.4
27 mm8.7 ± 5.7
29 mm11.0 ± 3.0
Other pre-specifiedParticipants' Mean Aortic Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement at 10 Years Post-Implant by Valve Size

Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve estimated by echocardiography. Mean EOA in square centimeters is reported separately for each valve size.

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · square centimeters
Participants' Mean Aortic Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement at 10 Years Post-Implant by Valve Size
square centimetersSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
19 mm1.0 ± 0.3
21 mm1.2 ± 0.3
23 mm1.4 ± 0.3
25 mm1.7 ± 0.5
27 mm1.7 ± 0.4
29 mm1.7 ± 0.1
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants by Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Grade at 10 Years Post-Implant

Regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve does not fully seal, allowing backflow of blood through the closed valve. The amount of aortic regurgitation in this study was graded as none, trivial, mild, moderate or severe by echocardiographic assessment. Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation can cause symptoms of heart failure, such as fatigue, shortness of breath and exercise intolerance.

Time frame:
10 years post-implant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Grade at 10 Years Post-Implant
ParticipantsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
None60
Trivial53
Mild30
Moderate12
Severe0
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class, Preoperatively and at 10 Years Post-Implant

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates heart failure symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Time frame:
Preoperative through 10 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class, Preoperatively and at 10 Years Post-Implant
ParticipantsSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Preoperative — NYHA Class I23
Preoperative — NYHA Class II166
Preoperative — NYHA Class III133
Preoperative — NYHA Class IV7
10 Years — NYHA Class I111
10 Years — NYHA Class II26
10 Years — NYHA Class III14
10 Years — NYHA Class IV1

Adverse events

Collected over 10 Years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta Valve67/329 (20.4%)272/329 (82.7%)—
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 79
Most frequent serious events
EventSubjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta Valve
Cardiac ArrhythmiasCardiac disorders93/329
Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders55/329
Major BleedingBlood and lymphatic system disorders42/329
Heart Failure Signs and SymptomsCardiac disorders34/329
Structural Valve Deterioration, Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve ImplantCardiac disorders34/329
Structural Valve Deterioration, ExplantedCardiac disorders31/329
MalignanciesNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)28/329
Myocardial IschemiaCardiac disorders26/329
Lower Respiratory Tract And Lung InfectionsInfections and infestations24/329
Urinary Tract DisordersRenal and urinary disorders24/329

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Mean69.7 ± 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Female105
Male224
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Canada102
United States227
Preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification III or IV
Preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification III or IV(Participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Count of participants140
History of Coronary Artery Disease
History of Coronary Artery Disease(Participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Count of participants180
History of Hypertension
History of Hypertension(Participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Count of participants260
History of Diabetes
History of Diabetes(Participants)Subjects Previously Implanted With a Trifecta™ Valve
Count of participants80

10 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

11 sites
  • USC University Hospital
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Mission Health & Hospitals
    Asheville, North Carolina 28801, United States
  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Main Line Health Center/Lankenau Hospital
    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Intermountain Salt Lake Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84103, United States
  • St. Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Hôpital Laval)
    Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bavaria JE, Desai ND, Cheung A, Petracek MR, Groh MA, Borger MA, Schaff HV. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.12.087. Epub 2013 Mar 7. PubMed 23477687 ↗
  • Goldman S, Cheung A, Bavaria JE, Petracek MR, Groh MA, Schaff HV. Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):561-569.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089. Epub 2016 Nov 18. PubMed 27964975 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 9, 2012

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01593917
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 8, 2012
Start date
Jul 2, 2012
Primary completion
Sep 26, 2019
Completion
Sep 26, 2019
Results posted
Feb 1, 2021
Last update
Feb 11, 2025

Study contacts

Barathi Sethuraman
study director · Abbott Structural Heart

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion