CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01592409Updated Feb 11, 2019Results posted

Cannabis Effects on Driving-related Skills of Young Drivers

An interventional study of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and Placebo in Psychomotor Impairment, sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-11.

Sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death for young people. The investigators have recently found that driving after using cannabis is more common among young Canadian drivers than driving after drinking. While this observation raises concerns, the effects of cannabis on driving-related skills in this age group are not well understood. As well, evidence suggests that residual effects of cannabis on driving-related skills may be observed up to 24 hours later. These residual effects may have important implications for the effects of cannabis use on collision risk, but little evidence on them in available. This study will examine the effects of a single dose of cannabis (marijuana) on driving-related skills immediately following consumption, 24 hours later, and 48 hours later. To date, the residual effect at 48 hours has not been examined. A total of 142 subjects aged 19 to 25 years old will be randomly assigned to smoke either a placebo or active cannabis cigarette (12.5% THC potency). Following an eligibility screening and practice session, participants will attend 3 testing days; drug-administration, 24-hour follow-up and 48-hour follow-up. The effects of cannabis/placebo on performance of driving-related skills using a high-fidelity driving simulator will be assessed on each testing day. The effects of cannabis on mood, cognition, memory and complex reaction time will also be assessed. Identifying factors that affect the collision risks experienced by young drivers is a public health priority. While many young people believe that cannabis does not impair driving, some recent studies suggest that these may be very dangerous beliefs. This study will provide important information on how cannabis may affect the driving skills of young drivers, to inform efforts to understand and address cannabis-related collision in this age group.

Read the detailed description

This study will test the prediction that residual effects of an acute dose of cannabis on driving-related skills will be observed in a group of young drivers 48 hours following a single dose of smoked cannabis, and will also examine the effects of an acute dose of cannabis on those skills using driving simulator technology.

Study Objectives

  1. Examine the residual effects of a moderate dose of cannabis (12.5% THC) on driving simulator performance of young drivers. Simulated driving performance, tests of cognition, verbal memory, and mood will be measured concurrently with levels of cannabinoids in biological fluids at approximately 24 and 48 hours following acute drug exposure in male and female drivers aged 19 to 25. We will test the hypothesis that performance on a high-fidelity driving simulator task will be significantly impaired approximately 24 hours following a dose of cannabis in comparison to a placebo condition.
  2. Examine the acute effects of a moderate dose of cannabis (12.5% THC) on driving simulator performance of young drivers. Simulated driving performance, tests of cognition, verbal memory, and mood will be measured concurrently with levels of cannabinoids in biological fluids before and after drug administration. Cannabinoid levels in biological fluids will be measured over a 6 hour period following drug exposure. We will examine the relationship of cannabinoid levels to performance measures in this time frame.
  3. Explore the effects of driving history, driving attitudes, and individual difference measures (e.g., demographics, drug and alcohol use, etc.) on the acute and residual effects of cannabis on driving simulator performance of young drivers. Exploratory analyses will be undertaken to determine if the acute and residual effects of cannabis on the driving simulator task are influenced by these measures.
  4. Determine if a relationship exists between genetics and THC response. As an ancillary aim, blood samples may be collected for future research to determine if a relationship exists between genetic polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to cannabis.

Study Design and Duration

The study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled mixed-design study, including a randomized between-subjects comparison of the effects of smoked cannabis and both between- and within-subjects examination of its residual effects at 24 and 48 hours following one-time drug administration. Although a placebo condition is part of the study, this is not a treatment study.

Initial contact with potential subjects will be made via telephone, and study personnel will conduct a telephone screen for eligibility. Upon eligibility confirmation by telephone, participants will be asked to attend CAMH for an eligibility assessment. The study will consist of 5 sessions for each subject (an eligibility assessment, a practice day, and three subsequent testing days). Participants will be asked not to use cannabis for 48 hours prior to attending the practice day (Session 2). Although Session 1 can be completed at any time prior to the remaining study sessions, Sessions 2 - 5 must be performed on consecutive days.

In certain instances, the Qualified Investigator may ask a participant to return for re-screening, e.g. repeat of urine test or other assessments performed for eligibility assessment. Also, in case of unforeseen delays in scheduling study participation, the Qualified Investigator will determine if there is a need to ask a participant to repeat some assessments, e.g., physical examination.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychomotor Impairment

Keywords

  • cannabis impaired driving
  • driving simulation
  • acute psychopharmacologic effects of cannabis
  • residual effects of cannabis
  • young drivers
03

In context

Psychomotor Disorders

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychomotor Disorders; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is above the median of 49 across 15 interventional studies indexed under Psychomotor Disorders.

Browse Psychomotor Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females aged 19 to 25
  • Regular cannabis users (between one and four times per week)
  • Held a valid class G or G2 Ontario driver's license (or equivalent from another jurisdiction) for at least 12 months.
  • Willing to abstain from cannabis use for the duration of the study, and for 48 hours prior to Session 2.
  • Provides written and informed consent
  • Urine toxicology result positive for THC (indicating recent use of cannabis).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive breathalyzer results for alcohol on any given study day.
  • Is a regular user of medications that affect brain function (i.e., antidepressants, benzodiazepines, stimulants).
  • Diagnosis of severe medical or psychiatric conditions.
  • A first degree relative diagnosed with schizophrenia.
  • Meets criteria for current or lifetime Substance Use Disorders (DSM-IV) with the exception of nicotine.
  • Meets criteria for Cannabis Dependence (DSM-IV).
  • Is pregnant, is trying to become pregnant, or is currently breastfeeding.

Ongoing Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upon eligibility assessment, toxicology results indicate that the participant has not used cannabis recently.
  • Any toxicology screen after Session 2 - Practice Day indicating a psychoactive substance has been used other than cannabis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active cannabis

    In this condition, participants will receive a cigarette containing 12.5% active THC.

    Drug: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    In this condition, participants will receive a cannabis cigarette where the active THC has been removed (contains 0% THC).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugdelta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol

    A single cannabis cigarette (potency 12.5% THC) will be given to participants to smoke over a 10 minute period, ad lib. If the cigarette is not smoked in its entirety, the remainder will be weighed to estimate dose.

    Also known as: cannabis sativa, marijuana

  • DrugPlacebo

    A single placebo cannabis cigarette (0% THC) will be given to participants to smoke over a 10 minute period, ad lib. If the cigarette is not smoked in its entirety, the remainder will be weighed to estimate dose (as this is a double-blind study).

    Also known as: cannabis sativa, marijuana

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Psychomotor Impairment (Driving)

    The driving simulator will objectively measure driving behaviour during a number of pre-programmed driving scenarios. Zone/ Hazard performance measure: Mean Speed.

    Time frame: Approximate: at baseline (30 minutes before smoking), 30 minutes after smoking

07

Results

Posted Feb 11, 2019
Limitations and caveats
The study examined simulated driving behavior of young regular cannabis users (1 to 4 times per week) and the generalization to new or frequent cannabis users, older drivers, and to real-world driving is unclear.

Participant flow

Recruitment was by media ads and research postings in Toronto.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive CannabisPlacebo
Started6732
Completed6731
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPsychomotor Impairment (Driving)

The driving simulator will objectively measure driving behaviour during a number of pre-programmed driving scenarios. Zone/ Hazard performance measure: Mean Speed.

Time frame:
Approximate: at baseline (30 minutes before smoking), 30 minutes after smoking
Reported as:
Mean · change in kph
Psychomotor Impairment (Driving)
change in kphActive CannabisPlacebo
Psychomotor Impairment (Driving)3.38 ± 9.75-1.54 ± 7.36

Adverse events

Collected over Collected from session 1 (eligibility assessment) to session 2 (practice) (approx. 3 months); from session 2 to 3 (approx. 24 hours), from session 3 to 4 (approx. 24 hours), session 4 to session 5 (approx. 24 hours).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Cannabis0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)38/67 (56.7%)
Placebo0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)15/32 (46.9%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent other events
EventActive CannabisPlacebo
headacheGeneral disorders10/672/32
tiredness/fatigueGeneral disorders5/673/32
insomniaGeneral disorders6/670/32
dizziness/faintnessGeneral disorders5/672/32
injuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/672/32
anxiety/nervousnessPsychiatric disorders1/672/32
muscle/bone/joint painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/672/32
simulation sicknessEar and labyrinth disorders1/672/32
low blood pressureVascular disorders4/671/32
rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/670/32

Baseline characteristics

One participant was excluded from analyses because they admitted to having tried to skew their data. They withdrew from the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active CannabisPlaceboTotal
Mean22.22 ± 1.8821.97 ± 2.2422.14 ± 1.995
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active CannabisPlaceboTotal
Female19928
Male482270
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Active CannabisPlaceboTotal
Canada673198
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
    Toronto, Ontario M5S 2S1, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Adlaf EM, Begin P, Sawka E. Canadian Addiction Survey (CAS): A national survey of Canadians' use of alcohol and other drugs: Prevalence of use and related harms: Detailed report. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Cenre for Substance Abuse 2005
  • Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Backman JG, Schulenber JE. Monitoring the future: National results on adolescent drug use. Bethesda, MD.: National Institute on Drug Abuse 2009
  • WHO - Programme on substance abuse. Cannabis: a health perspective and research agenda: World Health Organization 1997.
  • Chipman ML, Macdonald S, Mann RE. Being "at fault" in traffic crashes: does alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, or polydrug abuse make a difference? Inj Prev. 2003 Dec;9(4):343-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.4.343. PubMed 14693897 ↗
  • Brault M, Dussault C, Bouchard J, Lemire AM. The contribution of alcohol and other drugs among fatally injured drivers in Quebec: final results. Société de l'assurance automobile du Quebec 2002. Available from: http://www.saaq.gouv.qc.ca/publications/dossiers_etudes/drogue_an.pdf
  • Laumon B, Gadegbeku B, Martin JL, Biecheler MB; SAM Group. Cannabis intoxication and fatal road crashes in France: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1371. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38648.617986.1F. Epub 2005 Dec 1. Erratum In: BMJ. 2006 Jun 3;332(7553):1298. PubMed 16321993 ↗
  • Siliquini R, Chiado Piat S, Gianino MM, Renga G. Drivers involved in road traffic accidents in Piedmont Region: psychoactive substances consumption. J Prev Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;48(4):123-8. PubMed 18557306 ↗
  • Stoduto G, Vingilis E, Kapur BM, Sheu WJ, McLellan BA, Liban CB. Alcohol and drug use among motor vehicle collision victims admitted to a regional trauma unit: demographic, injury, and crash characteristics. Accid Anal Prev. 1993 Aug;25(4):411-20. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90070-d. PubMed 8357454 ↗
  • Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos J, Batziris H, Chu M, Caplehorn J, Robertson MD, Swann P. The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Mar;36(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00153-7. PubMed 14642878 ↗
  • Lacey JH, Kelley-Baker T, Furr-Holden D, Voas RB, Romano E, Ramirez A, et al. 2007 National roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers: Drug results. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2009.
  • Blows S, Ivers RQ, Connor J, Ameratunga S, Woodward M, Norton R. Marijuana use and car crash injury. Addiction. 2005 May;100(5):605-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01100.x. PubMed 15847617 ↗
  • Asbridge M, Poulin C, Donato A. Motor vehicle collision risk and driving under the influence of cannabis: evidence from adolescents in Atlantic Canada. Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1025-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.006. Epub 2005 Jun 29. PubMed 15992751 ↗
  • Adlaf EM, Mann RE, Paglia A. Drinking, cannabis use and driving among Ontario students. CMAJ. 2003 Mar 4;168(5):565-6. PubMed 12615749 ↗
  • Fischer B, Rodopoulos J, Rehm J, Ivsins A. Toking and driving: Characteristics of Canadian university students who drive after cannabis use - an exploratory pilot study. Drugs Ed Prev Policy 13:179-87, 2006
  • O'Malley PM, Johnston LD. Drugs and driving by American high school seniors, 2001-2006. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Nov;68(6):834-42. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.834. PubMed 17960301 ↗
  • McGuire F, Dawe M, Shield KD, Rehm J, Fishcher B. Driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol in a cohort of high-frequency cannabis users: prevalence and reflections on current interventions. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 53(2): 247-259, 2011
  • Pope HG Jr, Gruber AJ, Yurgelun-Todd D. The residual neuropsychological effects of cannabis: the current status of research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995 Apr;38(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01097-i. PubMed 7648994 ↗
  • Heishman SJ, Huestis MA, Henningfield JE, Cone EJ. Acute and residual effects of marijuana: profiles of plasma THC levels, physiological, subjective, and performance measures. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Nov;37(3):561-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90028-g. PubMed 1965045 ↗
  • Smiley A. Marijuana: On-road and driving simulator studies. Alcohol, Drugs, and Driving. 2:121-34, 1986
  • Crancer A Jr, Dille JM, Delay JC, Wallace JE, Haykin MD. Comparison of the effects of marihuana and alcohol on simulated driving performance. Science. 1969 May 16;164(3881):851-4. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3881.851. PubMed 5767792 ↗
  • Cone EJ, Huestis MA. Relating blood concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol and metabolites to pharmacologic effects and time of marijuana usage. Ther Drug Monit. 1993 Dec;15(6):527-32. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199312000-00013. PubMed 8122288 ↗
  • Harder S, Rietbrock S. Concentration-effect relationship of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabiol and prediction of psychotropic effects after smoking marijuana. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;35(4):155-9. PubMed 9112136 ↗
  • McLaren J, Swift W, Dillon P, Allsop S. Cannabis potency and contamination: a review of the literature. Addiction. 2008 Jul;103(7):1100-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02230.x. Epub 2008 May 20. PubMed 18494838 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01592409
Lead sponsor
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Health Canada
Responsible party
Robert Mann (Principal Investigator, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2012
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Feb 11, 2019
Last update
Feb 11, 2019

Study contacts

Robert Mann, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Bernard Le Foll, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion