ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07252713CP-MOVESUpdated May 7, 2026

Complex Rehabilitation Technology Enabled Physical Activity for Children With Motor Delays Via Telehealth in Natural Environments

An interventional study of Stander Use in Cerebral Palsy (CP), Motor Disability and Motor Delay, sponsored by Ohio State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Year to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of CP-MOVES is to evaluate 1) the preliminary efficacy of a telehealth-delivered, parent coaching intervention in the use of adaptive standers, on physical activity, sleep, and endurance in young children with severe motor delays and 2) on physical activity, sedentary time, resting heart rate, and perceived stress in parents.

The main questions the study aims to answer include:

  1. Do measures of physiological fitness and sleep in children with severe motor delays (i.e., unable to stand without support) change after a therapist-directed, parent-delivered intervention using telehealth and adaptive standers?
  2. Do parents report any changes in their child's endurance, participation, or quality of life OR parent stress following intervention?

Children ages 1-6 years old with severe motor delay and one parent will:

  1. Complete three 30 minute sessions of standing in an adapted stander per week for 8 weeks. One session per week will be completed with a physical therapist, delivered through telehealth and two sessions per week will be completed as a home program with the parent and child (no therapist or telehealth).
  2. Wear activity tracker sensors on the wrist(s) and waist for one-week before and after treatment.
  3. Complete questionnaires about the child's endurance, participation, and quality of life and the parent's stress, before and after treatment.
  4. Complete an assessment of postural control before and after treatment.
  5. Complete an post-treatment interview
02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy (CP)
  • Motor Disability
  • Motor Delay

Keywords

  • Assistive Device
  • Stander
  • Physical Activity
  • Sedentary
  • Parent
  • Physical Therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Digital Health
  • Telehealth
  • Wearable Sensors
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,936 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 458 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 34 across 1,431 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University is the lead sponsor of 663 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Child age 1-6 years with CP or other severe motor delay (GMFCS IV-V);
  • Unable to stand without external support;
  • Parent willing and able to participate;
  • Internet access for telehealth;
  • Live within 50 miles of lab or willing to travel to OSU for pre and post testing and stander provision
  • One parent is fluent in English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to participate in telehealth
  • Parent/caregiver unable to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telehealth-delivered parent coaching intervention in adaptive stander use

    Children will receive an adaptive stander and complete 30-minute sessions 3 times per week for 8 weeks. One session per week will be telehealth-delivered with a study researcher.

    Behavioral: Stander Use

Interventions

  • BehavioralStander Use

    The intervention includes 8 weeks of adaptive standing training delivered via telehealth with PT parent-coaching (1 telehealth session/week + 2 parent-led practice sessions/week). Sessions are 30 minutes, 3x/ week. Participants are provided a stander, sized to their age and body size for use during the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wearable sensor physical activity data: Vector Magnitude

    Vector Magnitude is a measure of moderate to vigorous physical activity measured in G-Force units. To be measured pre/post in parent and child. Higher values indicate greater intensity of movement. Values range from 0 (sedentary) to very vigorous (\>9500). Expect increase in vector magnitude with intervention.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

  2. Wearable sensor physical activity data: Daily Activity Counts

    Wearable sensor outcomes measured in parent and child. Daily Activity Counts are a measure of frequency and intensity of physical activity, converted from raw acceleration data to unitless count data. Measure of activity over the whole day (expressed in minutes from 0-1440 per day) and binned into Sedentary, Light or Moderate/Vigorous physical activity. Expect increase in light and/or moderate to vigorous physical activity following intervention.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

  3. Wearable sensor physical activity data: Average Resting Heart Rate

    Wearable sensor outcomes measured in parent and child., Average resting heart rate, measure in beats per minute, provides a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. Normative values range from 50-100 beats per minute (adults and children, slightly higher in infants) with lower values indicating better fitness. Exploratory, but anticipate improved fitness (therefore lower resting heart rate) with intervention.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

  4. Wearable sensor physical activity data

    Wearable sensor outcomes measured in parent and child. Daily sedentary time, measured in minutes, quantifies the amount of time per day spent sitting, lying or otherwise stationary. Measured in minutes (range: 0-1440 per day). Less sedentary time is ideal. Expect less sedentary time following intervention.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

  5. Sleep wearable sensor data: total sleep time

    Sleep data measured in child only. Total sleep time is the amount of time, in minutes, that the child is sleeping. Measured in minutes (0-1440 minutes per day). Normative range from children ages 1-6 years is 9-14 hours per day. Exploratory measure, expect sleep to stay the same or slightly increase with increased physical activity.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

  6. Sleep wearable sensor data: Sleep Latency

    Sleep data measured in child only. Sleep latency is a measure of the time gap between when the child lays down at bedtime until they fall asleep, as measured by the wearable sensor. Sleep latency is measured in minutes (range: 0-1440 minutes in a single day). Exploratory, but expect sleep latency time to decrease.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

  7. Sleep wearable sensor data: Sleep efficiency

    Sleep data measured in child only. Sleep efficiency is the proportion of time in bed that the child is asleep and is reported as a percentage (range 0-100%). Exploratory variable, but expect values to improve with intervention.

    Time frame: For 7 days before 8 week intervention begins and 7 days after 8-week intervention ends.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CP-CHILD)

    A parent report measured designs to collect data across 6 domains including Activities of daily living, positioning transferring and mobility, comfort and emotions, communication social interaction, health, and overall quality of life. There are a total of 37 questions and. The questionnaire takes between 30 and 40 minutes to complete using a paper or electronic form. Scores are converted to a 0-100 scale. Normative value for a child with non-ambulatory CP is around 55-60. Lower scores indicate better health related quality of life. Expect scores to decrease with intervention.

    Time frame: before and after 8-week intervention

  2. Young Child-Participation in Environment Measure (YC-PEM)

    A parent report measure that provides detailed information about the child's participation home school and in the community. These activities are measured according to frequency, level of involvement, desire for change in child's level of participation, and environmental supports. The YC-PEM includes 28 items and is valid in children 0-5 years old. Score range is 0-76. Higher scores indicate better participation. Expect scores to increase (better participation) with intervention.

    Time frame: Before and after 8-week treatment

  3. The Early Activity Scale for Endurance (EASE)

    Measures endurance during physical activity in children with cerebral palsy. Eleven questions are rated on a 5 point Likert scale with a higher total score (range 11-55) indicating higher endurance. Higher scores indicate better endurance. Expect increase in scores following intervention.

    Time frame: Before and after 8 week treatment

  4. Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14)

    Parents rate their stress levels over the past month. Fourteen items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale; higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. Lower scores indicate less stress. Expect decrease in stress (and therefore decreased PSS-14 score) following intervention.

    Time frame: Before and after 8-week treatment period

  5. Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCO)

    The Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) is a standardized observational assessment used with infants and children with neuromotor impairments, including cerebral palsy. The SATCo will evaluate the participants' ability to maintain upright trunk posture in sitting when external support is provided at progressively lower trunk segments. Trunk control is assessed across static, active, and reactive conditions, reflecting the child's ability to maintain alignment, control posture during voluntary head movement, and recover alignment following brief external perturbations. The SATCo yields an ordinal score representing the highest trunk segment at which control is demonstrated, with higher scores indicating more advanced trunk control. Higher levels of achieved control (i.e., maintaining alignment with support lowered further down the trunk) indicate better trunk function, so higher segmental scores reflect improved postural control.

    Time frame: Before and after 8-week intervention

  6. Reaching Assessment

    The reaching activity will be collected during the weekly 30-minute telehealth with the therapist. This telehealth therapy session will be recorded, and within a 5-10-minute window, the therapist will direct the parent to elicit reaching during the play session with the child. The 5-10-minute reaching activity will be removed from the 30-minute recorded telehealth with a therapist. The trimmed data will be coded using the behavioral coding tool Datavyu.

    Time frame: During treatment weeks 1, 2, 7, 8

  7. Parent Interview

    The virtual interview with the parent will be audio recorded and stored in our lab's protected data-sharing system on Microsoft Teams. The questions will explore parents' experiences during the 8-week telehealth program, focusing on barriers/facilitators and perceived self-efficacy in delivering the home program.

    Time frame: within 2 weeks of end of 8 week treatment period

  8. Parenting Sense of Competence Scale-Revised

    Parents will also fill out the Parenting Sense of Competence-Revised (PSOC-R), which contains 16 items. There are 10 items on the Efficacy subscale and 6 items on Satisfaction. All items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale. Possible scores range from 10 to 60 for Efficacy and 6 to 36 for Satisfaction. High scores on the subscales indicate high self-efficacy and satisfaction. We expect the intervention, which involve parent coaching in standing skills, will increase PSOC-R scores.

    Time frame: Before and after 8-week intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Pediatric Assessment and Rehabilitation Lab
    Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
    Recruiting
    • Petra Sternberg · Contactpetra.sternberg@osumc.edu · 6145725446
    • Maus Elizabeth, DPT · Principal investigator
    • Sara Tafone, DPT · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — For this small pilot study we do not anticipate sharing results due to difficulty in maintaining subject confidentiality in a small pilot study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07252713
Collaborators
American Physical Therapy Association
Responsible party
Jill Heathcock (Director, PEARL Lab, Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 28, 2025
Start date
Feb 19, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

Elizabeth Maus
Contact
elizabeth.maus@osumc.edu
6148141279
Petra Sternberg
Contact
petra.sternberg@osumc.edu
6145725446
Jill Heathcock, PhD
principal investigator · Ohio State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion