CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01582841HNPCCUpdated Aug 31, 2016

Integrating Genetic Testing for Lynch Syndrome in a Managed Care Setting

An interventional study of MSI screening test in Colon Cancer and Lynch Syndrome, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-31.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
247
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators research mobilizes the resources of an integrated health-delivery system with extensive electronic clinical data to implement and evaluate a new strategy to maximize screening of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) patients for Lynch Syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Screening tests for Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) [also called Lynch Syndrome], are among the few available validated genetic tests that have been recommended as an evidence-based practice that can save lives. However, more than half of patients who meet well-established and accepted screening criteria do not receive screening. This is a critical failure for patients and for the health-care delivery system because HNPCC mutation carriers are at exceptionally high risk for colorectal and other HNPCC-related cancers, and because clinical strategies can prevent future cancers, or provide early detection, for individuals affected with HNPCC and their relatives. HNPCC testing is also cost-effective compared to treating individuals with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).

To address this shortfall in practice, our proposed research mobilizes the resources of an integrated health-delivery system with extensive electronic clinical data to implement and evaluate a new strategy to maximize screening of CRC patients for HPNCC. The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) working group recommended that all newly diagnosed CRC patients be screened for HPNCC, but was not able to recommend a best-strategy to accomplish this aim. Therefore, using the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), developed by one of our co-investigators, to guide the analyses, the investigators will:

Aim #1: Conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a universal laboratory test-based HNPCC screening program compared to the current practice of physician referral and self-referral.

Aim #2: Elucidate patient, provider, and system factors important to success of implementation.

Aim #3: (revised and approved during year 1): To create, refine, and disseminate an implementation guide for HNPCC screening by combining the results from Aims 1-2 and the perspectives from informant interviews of key staff at future diverse dissemination-implementation sites: Case Western Reserve University, Oregon Health \& Sciences University, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, and Safety Net West Clinics. Addition to Aim 3: We will contribute materials to the LSSN website for dissemination of implementation materials.

This study aims to evaluate implementation of a novel HNPCC screening program and assess, for all stakeholders, facilitators and barriers to program implementation and success. Results from this study will help achieve the Healthy People 2020 objective of reducing CRC mortality. It will add to the growing literature in the increasingly important area of translating research findings into real-world practice, a subject of the NIH Roadmap. Many of the findings will be useful in other clinical areas and will be broadly applicable to other health care organizations aiming to improve access to genetic tests for cancers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colon Cancer
  • Lynch Syndrome

Keywords

  • Colon Cancer
  • Lynch Syndrome
  • Genetic Screening
03

In context

Colonic Neoplasms

1,432 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Neoplasms; 357 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 247 is above the median of 90 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Colonic Neoplasms.

Browse Colonic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 385 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. At least 18 years old
  2. Kaiser Permanente member
  3. Referral or scheduled colon surgery
  4. No known cognitive impairments (e.g., Alzheimer's Disease) that would impact the ability to be consented
  5. English speaker
  6. Diagnosis of colon cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Under the age of 18
  2. Known cognitive impairment
  3. Inability to speak/understand English
  4. On the research exclusion list
  5. Known Lynch syndrome
  6. No diagnosis of colon cancer
  7. In hospice
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
247 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MSI testing

    All individuals in the intervention arm who consent to participate in the HNPCC screening will have their tumors evaluated for MSI following surgery. Those with MSI-H results will receive a genetic counseling informational call.

    Procedure: MSI screening test

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    These patients will be treated as usual by their oncologist and medical team. These patients receive a follow up letter a year after randomization, alerting them to the availability of clinical Lynch Syndrome screening.

Interventions

  • ProcedureMSI screening test

    All individuals in the intervention arm who consent to participate in the HNPCC screening will have their tumors evaluated for MSI.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Implementation effectiveness

    The primary outcomes to assess implementation effectiveness are: number of patients who receive HNPCC screening test results; number of physicians who receive their patients HPNCC screening test results; completion of the educational session at three months of follow-up; and number of patients with MSI-H (microsatellite instability-high) test results who are contacted by medical genetics.

    Time frame: All patients will be followed up to 5 years. Most active participation and chart review will take place within one year of surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaiser Permanente Northwest
    Portland, Oregon 97227, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01582841
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
Case Western Reserve University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Vanderbilt University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Last update
Aug 31, 2016

Study contacts

Katrina AB Goddard, PhD
principal investigator · Kaiser Permanente

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion