CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01581021Updated Feb 3, 2014Results posted

Pedicle Screw Usage in Conventional Fixation Pattern Constructs Compared to Thoracic Hook Constructs in Scoliosis

An interventional study of Pedicle screws and Laminar Hooks in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, sponsored by University of Mississippi Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-03.

Sponsored by University of Mississippi Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Scoliosis is a deformity in which there is an abnormal curvature of the spine. Surgery is the main method of correcting this deformity. Rods are attached to the spine to make it strait. There are two ways to fix these rods to the bone of the spine: laminar hooks or pedicle screws. Hooks are an older form of fixation and do not penetrate the bone, but are instead placed over a part of the vertebra called the lamina. Screws are newer and do penetrate the bone. Screws are placed into the part of the vertebra called the pedicle. Most surgeons think screws correct scoliosis better than hooks. The current literature agrees that screws are better for deformity correction in the lumbar spine and patients with severe deformity. There is disagreement in the literature regarding which works better in the thoracic spine in less severe deformity. There are no randomized, controlled trials in the literature that examine whether constructs that use hooks in the thoracic spine and screws in the lumbar spine (called hybrid constructs) work as well as all-screw constructs. This clinical study is a randomized controlled trial being conducted to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with scoliosis undergoing surgical correction for their curves using either all-screw or hybrid constructs as fixation devices. The study population is limited to those with less severe deformity and the investigators' hypothesis is that hybrid constructs will be as acceptable as screws in terms of correction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • randomized
  • controlled
  • hooks
  • screws
03

In context

Scoliosis

594 studies on the registry are indexed under Scoliosis; 139 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 58 is above the median of 44 across 344 interventional studies indexed under Scoliosis.

Browse Scoliosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Mississippi Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (57%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis or neuromuscular scoliosis
  • Fusion to include six of more levels in thoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbar region
  • Less than 21 years of age
  • Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history, and surgeon judgement
  • Willing to comply with the follow-up clinical and radiographic evaluation schedules
  • Informed consent signed by patient and parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scoliosis with curvature greater than 100 degrees or less than 40
  • Smaller juvenile subjects weighing less than 30 kg
  • Rigid curves
  • Infection in the disc or spine, past or present
  • Subject is pregnant
  • Evidence of abuse of alcohol and/or illicit drugs
  • Subject is prisoner
  • Subject has evidence of tumor(s), malignant disease or other significant illness with decreased life expectancy
  • Subject is immunocompromised or being treated with immunosuppressive agents
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Thoracic Pedicle Screws

    Group treated with pedicle screws in the thoracic spine

    Device: Pedicle screws

  • Active comparator
    Laminar Hooks

    Group treated with hooks in the thoracic spine

    Device: Laminar Hooks

Interventions

  • DevicePedicle screws

    Screws that are placed into the pedicle of vertebral body.

  • DeviceLaminar Hooks

    Hooks are placed over the lamina of the vertebral body

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Main Thoracic Cobb

    X-rays measures the degree of curve in the thoracic spine.

    Time frame: 24 months post-operative

  2. Rotation

    The degree to which the spinal column is rotated from its normal position will be assessed.

    Time frame: 24 months post-operative

  3. Scoliosis Research Society-30 Survey

    Participants were administered a validated survey for evaluating patient quality of life and satisfaction with treatment. Total SRS-30 scores (max = 150) and the domains: function (max = 35), pain (max = 30), self-image (max = 45), mental health (max = 25), and satisfaction with management (max = 15) were analyzed on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The mean was obtained by dividing maximum possible score by the number of questions answered.

    Time frame: 24 months post-operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mobilization and Pain Survey

    Using a numeric rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = unbearable pain), patients were asked to estimate their experienced pain while at rest and when mobile by specifying a number on the scale.

    Time frame: 24 months post-operative

07

Results

Posted Feb 3, 2014
Limitations and caveats
The design of this study is a computer-generated randomized trial. Initially, the first 3 participants were not computer-randomized and therefore, these subjects had to be removed from the study.

Participant flow

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were recruited at a University Mississippi Medical center clinic from Nov. 2005 to Dec. 2008.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneThoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar Hooks
Started2929
Completed1918
Not completed1011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up46
Withdrew: More than 2 hooks in thoracic30
Withdrew: Neuromuscular21
Withdrew: Not randomized12
Withdrew: Lenke 6 classification01
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy01

Outcome measures

PrimaryMain Thoracic Cobb

X-rays measures the degree of curve in the thoracic spine.

Time frame:
24 months post-operative
Reported as:
Mean · Degree
Main Thoracic Cobb
DegreeThoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar Hooks
Preoperative55 ± 658 ± 8
4 weeks post-operative15 ± 718 ± 8
24 months at final follow-up14 ± 623 ± 8
PrimaryRotation

The degree to which the spinal column is rotated from its normal position will be assessed.

Time frame:
24 months post-operative
Reported as:
Mean · degree
Rotation
degreeThoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar Hooks
Preoperative15 ± 414 ± 4
24 month post-operative7 ± 311 ± 5
PrimaryScoliosis Research Society-30 Survey

Participants were administered a validated survey for evaluating patient quality of life and satisfaction with treatment. Total SRS-30 scores (max = 150) and the domains: function (max = 35), pain (max = 30), self-image (max = 45), mental health (max = 25), and satisfaction with management (max = 15) were analyzed on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The mean was obtained by dividing maximum possible score by the number of questions answered.

Time frame:
24 months post-operative
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Scoliosis Research Society-30 Survey
units on a scaleThoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar Hooks
Preoperative3.9 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.2
24 months post operative4.0 ± 0.24.1 ± 0.3
SecondaryMobilization and Pain Survey

Using a numeric rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = unbearable pain), patients were asked to estimate their experienced pain while at rest and when mobile by specifying a number on the scale.

Time frame:
24 months post-operative
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mobilization and Pain Survey
units on a scaleThoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar Hooks
Resting Pain Scale Preoperative2 ± 2.311.96 ± 2.49
Resting Pain Scale 24 mo Post-operative1.25 ± 1.861.0 ± 1.41
Mobilization Preoperative Pain Scale2.433 ± 2.742.16 ± 2.34
Mobilization 24 mo Postoperative Pain Scale1.25 ± 2.171.6 ± 1.55

Adverse events

Collected over No adverse events occurred.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Thoracic Pedicle Screws—0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)
Laminar Hooks—0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Thoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar HooksTotal
<=18 years282755
Between 18 and 65 years123
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Thoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar HooksTotal
Mean13.62 ± 2.2114.17 ± 2.2113.90 ± 2.21
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Thoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar HooksTotal
Female252247
Male4711
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Thoracic Pedicle ScrewsLaminar HooksTotal
United States292958
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    Jackson, Mississippi 39202, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01581021
Lead sponsor
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Responsible party
Lawrence Haber (Chief Pediatric Orthopaedics/Associate Professor, University of Mississippi Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2012
Start date
Aug 2005
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Aug 2011
Results posted
Feb 3, 2014
Last update
Feb 3, 2014

Study contacts

Lawrence L Haber, MD
principal investigator · University of Mississippi Medical Center
Erika D Womack, BS MS
study director · University of Mississippi Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion