A Phase 4 interventional study of NivNava and Cpap in Heart Defects, Congenital and Surgery, sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged Up to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-09.
Sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Neonates who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass almost always require non-invasive respiratory support (NIV) in relay to conventional ventilation. Current nasal interfaces do not generally allow synchronised bilevel ventilation. NIV-NAVA mode allows, through an oesophageal catheter, to record the electrical activity of the diaphragm and thereby synchronize breaths from the ventilator on the inspiratory efforts of the child. Moreover, the pressure support delivered by the ventilator may be proportional to the diaphragmatic effort developed by the child. This mode, associated with the interface Miniflow®, could increase the comfort of the child by allowing a more efficient synchronization and reducing its respiratory work. To our knowledge, this ventilation mode with this interface has not been evaluated in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery in the newborns. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of this ventilatory mode and evaluate its influence on ventilatory parameters of this category of infants.
Study Design:
Single centre prospective crossover study
Study Objectives:
Main objectives:
Evaluation of the following parameters:
Secondary objectives:
Evaluation of the following parameters:
Conduct of the study:
First phase: placement of EADI catheter and extubation
When extubation criteria are met, the oesophageal EADI catheter is placed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The ventilation mode is then switched to Pressure Support Mode with the same Peep as in the previous mode and a pressure support of 10 cmH2O.
During 30 minutes, trends in respiratory rate, tidal volume, PEEP, inspiratory pressure, FiO2, EADI min, EADi max are recorded.
After 30 minutes, an arterial blood gas analysis is performed to determine the values of PaCO2, PaO2 and pH before randomization.
The child is extubated according to the procedures of the service and the non-invasive ventilation relay is introduced through the Miniflow® interface with nasal prongs adapted to the morphology of the child. An adrenaline nebulisation can be given before starting NIV in case of respiratory distress due to laryngeal oedema.
Second phase: nCPAP or NIV-NAVA
Following randomisation, the child is included in the "nCPAP first" arm or "NIV-NAVA first" arm and is ventilated in the designated mode for 30 minutes. During the first 15 minutes, the ventilation parameters are adapted according to the procedures below:
nCPAP parameters adaptation:
NIV-NAVA parameters adaptation:
Over the last 15 minutes of this ventilation mode, trends in respiratory rate, tidal volume, PEEP, inspiratory pressure, FiO2, EADI min, EADi max are recorded.
On Minutes M16, M21 and M29 in NIV-NAVA mode, synchronisation data are recorded : auto-triggering, double triggering, inspiration beginning and ending.
After 30 minutes, an arterial blood gas analysis is performed to determine the evolution of the values of PaCO2, PaO2 and pH.
At any time, if the re-intubation criteria are met, the child is re-intubated and returned to conventional ventilation. He is then excluded of the study.
Third phase: nCPAP or NIV-NAVA
The ventilation mode is changed from nCPAP to NIV-NAVA or from NIV-NAVA to nCPAP. The adaptation protocol and the recorded parameters are the same as in the second phase.
After 30 minutes, an arterial blood gas analysis is performed to determine the evolution of the values of PaCO2, PaO2 and pH.
At any time, if the re-intubation criteria are met, the child is re-intubated and returned to conventional ventilation. He is then excluded of the study.
Fourth phase: end of the study
The study concludes at the end of the third phase. The child is left in the better tolerated ventilation mode, as judged by the clinician.
1,031 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital; 262 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 60 across 531 interventional studies indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital.
Browse Heart Defects, Congenital studies →Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain is the lead sponsor of 348 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Starting crossover by NIVnava mode
Device: NivNava
Start crossover by Cpap on nasal canula
Device: Cpap
Non-invasive Nava ventilation mode on nasal cannula
Also known as: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist
nasal Cpap on nasal cannula
Also known as: InfantFlow(R), CareFusion(R), SanDiego, Ca, USA
Evaluation of the percentage of asynchronies during the nava mode
One of the aims of the NAVA mode is to provide better synchronization between the child's breathing needs and the breathing cycles given by the ventilator. By comparing the EDI curve (electric activity of the diaphragm of the child) and the flow and pressure curves of the ventilator, it is possible to determine the percentage of asynchronies during the nava mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of breathing rhythm between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of PEEP (positive end expiratory pressure) between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of Inspiratory Pressure between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of FiO2 between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of PaO2 between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of PaCO2 between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
Comparison of blood pH between nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) mode and NIV-NAVA mode
Time frame: from minute zero to minute 90
The record gives a start of Nov 2011, a primary completion of Dec 2013 and a completion of Dec 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain →