ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01568060Updated Jan 27, 2023

Post-marketing Surveillance to Assess the Safety of Infanrix-IPV Vaccine Among Infants and Children in Korea

An observational study in Acellular Pertussis, Diphtheria and Tetanus, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 2 Months to 6 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-27.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
645
Ages
2 Months to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to collect safety information following routine vaccination with Infanrix-IPV among infants and children in Korea.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acellular Pertussis
  • Diphtheria
  • Tetanus
  • Poliomyelitis
  • Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines

Keywords

  • Safety
  • Infanrix-IPV
  • Post-marketing surveillance
  • Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and poliomyelitis
03

In context

Diphtheria

267 studies on the registry are indexed under Diphtheria; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 645 is below the median of 970 across 24 observational studies indexed under Diphtheria.

Browse Diphtheria studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,650 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 264 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 241 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Months to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Infants and children who receive at least one dose of Infanrix-IPV as a part of routine practice at a private clinic or hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who the investigator believes that their parent(s)/legally acceptable representative(s) can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol.
  • Korean male or female subjects who are eligible for the primary and/or booster doses of Infanrix-IPV according to the Korean Prescribing Information.
  • Written or signed obtained from the parent(s)/ legally acceptable representative(s) of the child. Where parent(s)/ legally acceptable representatives are illiterate, the consent form will be countersigned by an impartial witness. Prior to enrollment of the subject into the post-marketing surveillance, the subject's parents/legally acceptable representatives will be requested to provide information regarding the enrollment of their child in a same/similar study previously. And prior to obtaining informed consent form, the investigator will check whether the subject is eligible for vaccination.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • At the time of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) entry, the and precautions of use indicated in the local Prescribing Information should be checked and the subject must not be included in the PMS if there is any contraindication. Any changes in the locally approved Prescribing Information must be implemented immediately.
  • Subjects who receive any or non-licensed DTPa-IPV vaccine within 30 days prior to study start will not be enrolled.
  • Child in care.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
645 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infanrix-IPV group

    Infants and children who received at least one dose of Infanrix-IPV as a part of routine practice at a private clinic or hospital in korea

    Other: Infanrix-IPV data collection

Interventions

  • OtherInfanrix-IPV data collection

    Safety monitoring: recording of adverse events using diary cards and recording of serious adverse events using the latest version of Korea's Post-Marketing Surveillance Serious Adverse Event Reporting Form.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of adverse events

    Time frame: During the 30-day (Day 0 - Day 29) follow-up period after each vaccine dose.

  2. Occurrence of serious adverse events

    Time frame: Starting at Visit 1 in the post-marketing surveillance (PMS) up to 30 days (Day 0 to Day 29) after the last dose is administered in the PMS

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 130-702, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee SM, Kim SJ, Chen J, Song R, Kim JH, Devadiga R, Kim YK. Post-marketing surveillance to assess the safety and tolerability of a combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DTaP-IPV) in Korean children. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1572406. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PubMed 30668217 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2012 to primary completion in Dec 2015, 42 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 29, 2012
First posted
Apr 2, 2012
StartActual
May 21, 2012
Primary completionActual
Dec 15, 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 15, 2015
Last update
Jan 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01568060
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 2, 2012
Start date
May 21, 2012
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2015
Completion
Dec 15, 2015
Last update
Jan 27, 2023

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion