CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01549340Updated Mar 3, 2017Results posted

Retrospective Record Review of Adults and Children Advised for Allergen Immunotherapy (MK-7243-022)

An observational study in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis and Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by ALK-Abelló A/S. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-03.

Sponsored by ALK-Abelló A/S · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
8,790
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of participants that initiate allergen immunotherapy (AIT) upon the recommendation of their physician and the proportion of participants that persist with their AIT throughout the recommended course.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
  • Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

  • Rhinitis
  • Allergen immunotherapy
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8,790 is above the median of 141 across 172 observational studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

ALK-Abelló A/S is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who were managed by physicians in a large allergy practice, recommended for AIT between 2005 and 2011 and identified by their electronic health records.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of AR with or without allergic conjunctivitis (AC)
  • Documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants receiving AIT as an AR treatment without documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option
  • Participants receiving immunotherapy for insect sensitivities only
  • AIT started before 2005
05

Study design

Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
8,790 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants with Allergic Rhinitis (AR)

    Patients in a private allergy practice who were diagnosed with AR, with or without asthma, and advised to consider AIT between January 2005 and June 2011 and whose medical records were retrospectively reviewed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Drops

    The percentage of participants who were advised by their physician to start AIT and elected to initiate AIT was calculated. AIT initiation was broken down by type of AIT initiated (SCIT or SLIT).

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of Treatment

    The percentage of participants who initiated SCIT or SLIT and completed 5 years of treatment was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled. If extract refills continued past the recommended time for therapy (e.g. 5 years from the start of therapy), the participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course. If the extract refills stopped prior to the end of the recommended time for therapy, but the last refill occurred within 6 months of the recommended time for therapy, this participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course.

    Time frame: At 5 years

  3. Duration of Treatment With SCIT or SLIT

    The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR who initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  4. Reason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended Course

    The reason for discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT treatment more than 6 months before completion of the recommended course of therapy was recorded. The percentage of participants whose records were reveiwed and who discontinued SCIT or SLIT due to different reasons was calculated.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT

    The percentage of participants who had AR and asthma and initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  2. Duration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR Alone

    The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR and asthma and for all participants with AR only was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT treatment was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2014

Participant flow

This study involved a retrospective record review of patients in a private allergy and asthma practice who were recommended to receive allergen immunotherapy (AIT) to treat their allergic rhinitis (AR) by their physician between January 2005 and June 2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParticipants With AR
Started8790
Started ait3182
Completed385
Not completed8405

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Drops

The percentage of participants who were advised by their physician to start AIT and elected to initiate AIT was calculated. AIT initiation was broken down by type of AIT initiated (SCIT or SLIT).

Time frame:
Up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Drops
percentage of participantsParticipants With AR
Elected SCIT28.2
Elected SLIT8.0
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of Treatment

The percentage of participants who initiated SCIT or SLIT and completed 5 years of treatment was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled. If extract refills continued past the recommended time for therapy (e.g. 5 years from the start of therapy), the participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course. If the extract refills stopped prior to the end of the recommended time for therapy, but the last refill occurred within 6 months of the recommended time for therapy, this participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course.

Time frame:
At 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of Treatment
percentage of participantsParticipants With AR
Completed 5 years of SCIT (n=2481)10.8
Completed 5 years of SLIT (n=701)2.6
PrimaryDuration of Treatment With SCIT or SLIT

The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR who initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · years
Duration of Treatment With SCIT or SLIT
yearsParticipants With AR
SCIT2.4 ± 1.8
SLIT1.9 ± 1.4
PrimaryReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended Course

The reason for discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT treatment more than 6 months before completion of the recommended course of therapy was recorded. The percentage of participants whose records were reveiwed and who discontinued SCIT or SLIT due to different reasons was calculated.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Reason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended Course
percentage of participantsParticipants With AR Who Discontinued SCITParticipants With AR Who Discontinued SLIT
No reason documented6769
Adverse event74
Lack of efficacy13
Financial44
Other reason2120
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT

The percentage of participants who had AR and asthma and initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT
percentage of participantsParticipants With AR and Asthma
Initiated SCIT25.2
Initiated SLIT8.7
SecondaryDuration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR Alone

The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR and asthma and for all participants with AR only was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT treatment was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · years
Duration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR Alone
yearsParticipants With AR and AsthmaParticipants With AR Alone
SCIT2.4 ± 1.772.4 ± 1.82
SLIT2.1 ± 1.501.8 ± 1.37

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Participants With AR———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Participants With AR
Mean26.8 ± 16.1
Gender
Gender(Participants)Participants With AR
Female4439
Male4351
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Anolik R, Schwartz AM, Sajjan S, Allen-Ramey F. Patient initiation and persistence with allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Jul;113(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 9. PubMed 24814759 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01549340
Lead sponsor
ALK-Abelló A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2012
Start date
Nov 2011
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
May 2012
Results posted
Mar 6, 2014
Last update
Mar 3, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion