CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01533090LowVolumePEGUpdated Feb 15, 2012

Evaluation of Reduced-volume PEG Bowel Preparation Administered the Same Day of Colonoscopy

An interventional study of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and PEG low volume with bisacodyl in Colonic Polyps, Cancer Colon and Inflammatory Bowel Disease, sponsored by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-15.

Sponsored by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
162
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The conventional total dose of 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) given the day before the procedure is safe and effective. It has been the standard cleansing regimen for the last 25 years. To overcome the difficulty in completing the bowel preparation due to large volume and/or taste, reduced-volume (mixed) bowel preparation of bisacodyl and 2 L of PEG have been shown to provide adequate colon cleansing and better tolerability.

LoVol-esse is a reduced-volume PEG-based bowel preparation to be used in combination with bisacodyl and designed to improve patient tolerability and attitude toward bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy thanks to the reduced volume and improved taste. The present study is intended to compare the new dosing regimen of the bowel lavage solution given the same day compared with standard PEG formulation (SELG 1000) given the day before colonoscopy.

Read the detailed description

A polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) was originally developed in 1980 by the Fordtran group as isosmotic preparation for minimal water and electrolyte exchange with plasma to ensure safe cleansing of the bowel through a mechanical effect of large-volume lavage. The conventional total dose of 4 L given the day before the procedure is safe and effective and has been the standard cleansing regimen for the last 25 years. To overcome the difficulty in completing the bowel preparation due to large volume and/or taste, reduced-volume (mixed) bowel preparation of bisacodyl and 2 L of PEG-ELS have been shown to provide adequate colon cleansing and better tolerability.

In the last recent years, time of preparation has been demonstrated to be a critical factor for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Several studies have demonstrated that reducing the time interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the exam improves colon cleansing compared with standard dose regimen of the PEG-electrolyte solution given the day before colonoscopy. At the same time manufacturers have tried to improve the taste and palatability of PEG formulations by adding suitable ingredients such as ascorbic acid or citric acid. LoVol-esse is a reduced-volume PEG-based bowel preparation to be used in combination with bisacodyl and designed to improve patient tolerability and attitude toward bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy thanks to the reduced volume and improved taste. The present study is intended to compare the new dosing regimen of the bowel lavage solution given the same day compared with standard PEG formulation (SELG 1000) given the day before colonoscopy.

The results of this study will tells us if the last-hour preparation is effective and offers adequate tolerability and compliance to be adopted in clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colonic Polyps
  • Cancer Colon
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
03

In context

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

1,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; 437 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 162 is above the median of 70 across 770 interventional studies indexed under Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Browse Inflammatory Bowel Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart is the lead sponsor of 227 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • both sexes
  • aged between 18 and 85 yr
  • undergoing a complete colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation
  • toxic megacolon
  • major colonic resection
  • pregnant or at risk of becoming pregnant women
  • lactating women
  • inability to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study
  • no signed informed consent prior to inclusion in the study
  • known or suspected hypersensitivity to the active principles or other ingredients
  • history of anaphylaxis to drugs or allergic reactions in general
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
162 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    polyethylene glycol (PEG)

    Drug: polyethylene glycol (PEG)

  • Experimental
    PEG low volume with bisacodyl

    Drug: PEG low volume with bisacodyl

Interventions

  • Drugpolyethylene glycol (PEG)

    SELG-ESSE 1000 4 L: 2L THE DAY BEFORE OF COLONOSCOPY AND 2 L THE SAME DAY OF COLONOSCOPY

  • DrugPEG low volume with bisacodyl

    Lovolesse + Lovoldyl 2L of Lovolesse with 2 or 3 tablets of bisacodyl the day before of colonoscopy or 2L of Lovolesse with 2 or 3 tablets of bisacodyl the same day of colonoscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the overall quality of bowel preparation

    Quality of preparation will be graded according to the Ottawa Scale.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. safety

    incidence and severity of the following GI unexpected adverse events: nausea, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain/cramps on a 5-point Likert scale

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. compliance

    Proportion of patients able to: * drink \< 75% of the solution (poor compliance) * drink at least 75% of the solution (good compliance) * drink all the solution (optimal compliance)

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Digestive Endoscopy Unit of Catholic University
    Rome, 00168, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01533090
Lead sponsor
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Responsible party
Guido Costamagna (Professor, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 15, 2012
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Feb 15, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion