An observational study in Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.
Sponsored by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart · Observational
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer and cause of cancer death worldwide. Population-based screening programs for average risk populations have proven effective in reducing both incidence and mortality of CRC through early detection of cancer. The fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), has still a suboptimal diagnostic yield, with both missed adenomas and, mainly, unnecessary colonoscopies.The identification of novel, non-invasive biomarkers is currently one of the research areas driving most expenditure forces in the field of CRC.A large body of evidence shows that alterations of the gut microbiome and the enrichment of specific taxa(e.g. Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, and others) are involved in the pathogenesis of CRC. Moreover, recent studies, have discovered common microbial signatures able to reproducibly discriminate between patients with CRC and healthy controls.The goal of this observational study to develop a gut microbiome based diagnostic tool for the identification of CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas in patients enrolled in the national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (50-74 year-old) and among who refer to all centers involved in this study for screening colonoscopy with positivity of FIT, of both sex. The primary endpoint of the study is to develop a gut microbiome-based diagnostic tool for the identification of CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas in patients involved in the national CRC screening program, using both statistical and machine learning approaches. The secondary endpoints are:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 3rd most common cancer and the 2nd most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with nearly 2 million new cases and one million deaths in 2020. In the last decades, a population-based screening programs for average-risk populations have established as an effective strategy to reduce both incidence and mortality of CRC through early detection of cancer. The fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), the reference diagnostic tool in most countries, has still a suboptimal diagnostic yield, with both missed adenomas and, mainly, unnecessary colonoscopies. For these reasons, in the last years the identification of novel, non-invasive biomarkers is absolutely advocatein the field of CRC. A large body of evidence shows that alterations of the gut microbiome and the enrichment of specific taxa (e.g. Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, and others) are involved in the pathogenesis of CRC. Moreover, recent studies, including metagenomic meta-analyses from our group, have discovered common microbial signatures able to reproducibly discriminate between patients with CRC and healthy controls. Based on this evidence, international guidelines have recently advocated the exploitation of microbiome-based biomarkers for the screening of CRC in clinical practice, but such studies are not yet available to date.
The primary objective is to develop a gut microbiome-based diagnostic tool for the identification of CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas.
The secondary objectives are:
For all enrolled patients clinicians will record the following data:
All enrolled patients will undergo a colonoscopy within 4 weeks from the positive FIT, after colonoscopy endoscopic characteristics (size, site, shape based on Paris class.) and histopathological characteristics of detected lesions will be collected. Advanced colorectal adenomas will be defined as adenomas larger than or equal to 10 mm, and/or with villous components higher than or equal to 25%, and/or high-grade dysplasia.Moreover, patients diagnosed with CRC, will also undergo a total-body CT scan to stage the disease and will be referred to an oncological pathway in clinical practice, and the following data will be collected: presence of lymph node metastasis and of organ metastasis, TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) class..The enrollment phase will last 48 months.At the end of the enrollment phase, the investigators will perform the microbiome analysis, and the investigators will combined clinical, endoscopic and microbial data through statistical and machine learning algorithms to identify specific microbial biomarkers associated with CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas, to develop a new diagnostic tool, based on a scoring system.
Study Outcomes are detailed in the specific section of this website. Microbiome analysis will be performed with shotgun sequencing techniques. Moreover to obtain a panel of microbial species mostly associated with CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas, the investigators will exploit machine learning applications, for instance, using the widely adopted Random Forest algorithms, as well as meta-analytical approaches integrating our large cohort with previously published metagenomic cohorts. A defined panel of microbial species mostly associated with CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas will provide a comprehensive risk score based on microbiome features, with two specific goals, to improve the accuracy testing of the FIT diagnostic tool and to be easily interpretable by clinicians.All the collected clinical data will be statistically combined to rank microbial features from the most to least associated.
These rankings will be exploited to evaluate a microbiome profile from a new individual, and to report how many of the defined species in the previous panel are found, and hence linked with CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas. Associations between identified species and makers of interest will be estimated through robust statistical analysis methods, such as partial correlation or linear modeling. Then the associations will be ranked and compared across markers for the same species, giving a priority score for each species. Particular care will be dedicated to identifying potential confounding markers known to be associated with differences in microbiome composition, for instance, age, that instead should be used as covariates in the statistical modeling. In addition to statistical modeling, associations between species and markers will also be evaluated via ML approaches, particularly those providing feature importance scores for the input features (species, in our case), that can be used to rank the species across the different markers (e.g. Random Forest, LASSO, etc). Continuous variables will be reported as mean ± standard deviation or as median and interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage. Comparisons of variables will be made by t-test (or Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis), Chi-square test, or Fisher\'s exact test, as appropriate. A p-value \<0.05 will be considered to indicatestatistical significance. Logistic regression models will be performed to identify the presence of variables independently associated with outcomes. Variables considered in the models were selected through stepwise model selection and guided by clinical relevance. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v. 28.0 for Macintosh (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).
The investigators will employ a Machine Learning (ML) framework based on the scikit-learn Python package using a cross-validation approach with 100 bootstrap iterations and an 80/20 random splitting into training and testing folds. Classification and regression ML algorithms will be trained on both microbiome species-level taxonomic relative abundances and functional potential profiles. Species-level taxonomic abundances will be estimated by MetaPhlAn 4 (using the latest databases available, currently named Oct22) and normalized using the arcsin-sqrt transformation for compositional data. Functional potential profiles will be estimated using the latest HUMAnN 4 version and the investigators will consider both abundance estimations of single microbial gene families and of metabolic pathways. Partial correlations between species and markers will be computed using the Spearman index, to avoid biases due to outlier values and corrected for covariates, such as sex, age, and body-mass index, known to have an impact on microbiome composition. Partial correlation values will be corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for the false-discovery rate.
6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,202 is above the median of 250 across 1,440 observational studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.
Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →Catholic University of the Sacred Heart is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Participants will be selected among those enrolled in the national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program and among who refer to all centers involved in this study for screening colonoscopy. Patients with all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be considered for this study. A total of 1202 patients will be enrolled, based on sample size calculation and including a validation group. N=911 patients will be needed, and we will add 91 patients to cover a 10% potential drop-out and 200 patients as a validation group (20% of the study cohort). Patients enrolled in this validation cohort will have the same exclusion and inclusion criteria of other patients and will undergo the same study procedures.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Study cohort consists of patients enrolled in the national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program.Participants will be selected among those enrolled in the nationalcolorectal cancer (CRC) screening program and among who refer to all centers involved in this study for screening colonoscopy. Patients with all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be considered for this study. N=1202 patients will be enrolled, based on sample size calculation and including a validation group. N=911 patients will be needed, and we will add 91 patients to cover a 10% potential drop-out and 200 patients as a validation group (20% of the study cohort).
Diagnostic Test: Gut microbiome testing
Gut microbiome testing for the characterization of the patient gut microbiome
Gut microbiome-based diagnostic tool for CRC and advanced colorectal adenomas detection
Discovery of a gut microbial signature able to predict the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal adenomas
Time frame: 60 months
Correlation between clinical and endoscopic outcomes with FIT
The correlation of clinical and colonoscopy outcomes with fecal immunochemical testing results
Time frame: 60 months
Microbiome characteristics of fecal samples
The characterization of gut microbiome from an ecological, taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional point of view
Time frame: 60 months
Correlation between microbiome signatures with clinical and endoscopic outcomes
The correlation between microbiome signatures with clinical and colonoscopy outcomes, through statistical and machine-learning algorithms
Time frame: 60 months
Plan to share: Yes — The individual data of patients will be shared
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan
Time frame: Data will be available after the completion of the study, for 5 years
Access criteria: Data will be given upon reasonable request to the PI
Data sharing details ↗ · roma.unicatt.it
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart →