ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01532687Updated Sep 27, 2021Results posted

Gemcitabine With or Without Pazopanib in Treating Patients With Refractory Soft Tissue Sarcoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in Adult Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma, Adult Angiosarcoma and Adult Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor, sponsored by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-27.

Sponsored by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized phase II trial studies how well gemcitabine hydrochloride works with or without pazopanib hydrochloride in treating patients with refractory soft tissue sarcoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Pazopanib hydrochloride may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Pazopanib hydrochloride may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking blood flow to the tumor. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine hydrochloride is more effective with or without pazopanib hydrochloride in treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To investigate whether treatment with gemcitabine (gemcitabine hydrochloride) plus pazopanib (pazopanib hydrochloride) improves the median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma when compared to gemcitabine plus placebo.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess overall response in this population to gemcitabine plus pazopanib compared to gemcitabine plus placebo.

II. To assess overall survival (OS) in this population to gemcitabine plus pazopanib compared to gemcitabine plus placebo.

III. To investigate differences in treatment response in different histologic subgroups (liposarcoma vs. all other eligible soft tissue sarcoma subtypes).

IV. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of gemcitabine plus pazopanib.

V. To assess the progression-free survival and overall response in patients treated with single agent pazopanib following administration of gemcitabine in the cross-over portion of this study.

VI. To collect specimens for an exploratory analysis of potential biomarkers that predict response in patients receiving combination therapy with gemcitabine plus pazopanib.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and pazopanib hydrochloride orally (PO) on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and placebo PO on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who experience disease progression may receive single-agent pazopanib hydrochloride PO daily. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After the completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adult Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma
  • Adult Angiosarcoma
  • Adult Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor
  • Adult Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma
  • Adult Epithelioid Sarcoma
  • Adult Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma
  • Adult Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma
  • Adult Fibrosarcoma
  • Adult Leiomyosarcoma
  • Adult Liposarcoma
  • Adult Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
  • Adult Rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Adult Synovial Sarcoma
  • Adult Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
  • Malignant Adult Hemangiopericytoma
  • Recurrent Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma
  • Sarcoma
  • Stage III Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma AJCC v7
  • Stage IV Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma AJCC v7
03

In context

Sarcoma, Alveolar Soft Part

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma, Alveolar Soft Part; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 53 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma, Alveolar Soft Part.

Browse Sarcoma, Alveolar Soft Part studies →

Lead sponsor

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 243 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must provide written prior to performance of study-specific procedures or assessments, and must be willing to comply with treatment and follow-up; procedures conducted as part of the subject's routine clinical management (e.g., blood count, imaging study) and obtained prior to signing of informed consent may be utilized for screening or baseline purposes provided these procedures are conducted as specified in the protocol
  • confirmed diagnosis of or unresectable soft tissue sarcoma, excluding gastrointestinal stromal tumors, Kaposi's sarcoma, Ewing's family of tumors, and embryonal or alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma
  • (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  • per (RECIST) 1.1
  • Patients must have received at least one, but not more than three, systemic regimens for treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma; patients must have had a prior anthracycline in the , adjuvant, or metastatic setting unless medically inappropriate for the patient
  • Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy will not count towards prior treatment for metastatic disease, unless the patient within 2 years of completing such therapy.
  • (ANC) >= 1.5 x 10\^9/L
  • >= 8 g/dL; subjects may not have had a transfusion within 7 days of screening assessment
  • >= 100 x 10\^9/L
  • (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR) =\< 1.2 x (ULN); subjects receiving anticoagulation therapy are eligible if their INR is stable and within the recommended range for the desired level of anticoagulation
  • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) =\< 1.2 x ULN
  • Total =\< 1.5 x ULN
  • (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =\< 2.5 x ULN; concomitant elevations in bilirubin and AST/ALT above 1.0 x ULN (upper limit of normal) are not permitted
  • Serum creatinine =\< 1.5 mg/dL (133 umol/L)
  • Or, if > 1.5 mg/dL: calculated (ClCR) >= 30 mL/min
  • Urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPC) \< 1; if UPC >= 1, then a 24-hour urine protein must be assessed; subjects must have a 24-hour urine protein value \< 1 g to be eligible; use of urine dipstick for renal function assessment is not acceptable
  • Or 24-hour urine protein \< 1 g
  • A female is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is of:

    • Non- (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant), including any female who has had:

      • A hysterectomy
      • A bilateral oophorectomy (ovariectomy)
      • A bilateral tubal ligation
      • Is
  • Subjects not using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) must have experienced total cessation of menses for >= 1 year and be greater than 45 years in age, OR, in questionable cases, have a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) value > 40 mIU/mL and an estradiol value \< 40 pg/mL (\< 140 pmol/L)
  • Subjects using HRT must have experienced total cessation of menses for >= 1 year and be greater than 45 years of age OR have had documented evidence of menopause based on FSH and estradiol concentrations prior to initiation of HRT
  • Childbearing potential, including any female who has had a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment, preferably as close to the first dose as possible, and agrees to use adequate ; defined as follows:

    • Complete abstinence from sexual intercourse for 14 days before exposure to product, through the dosing period, and for at least 21 days after the last dose of investigational product
    • Oral contraceptive, either combined or progesterone alone
    • Injectable progesterone
    • Implants of levonorgestrel
    • Estrogenic vaginal ring
    • Percutaneous contraceptive patches
    • Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year
    • Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject
    • Double barrier method: condom and an occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a vaginal spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository)
  • Female subjects who are lactating should discontinue nursing prior to the first dose of study drug and should refrain from nursing throughout the treatment period and for 14 days following the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior ; note: subjects who have had another malignancy and have been disease-free for > 3 years, or subjects with a history of completely resected non-melanomatous skin carcinoma, successfully treated in situ carcinoma, or successfully treated superficial bladder cancer are eligible.
  • History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) or , except for individuals who have previously-treated , are asymptomatic, and have had no requirement for or anti-seizure medication for 6 months prior to first dose of study drug; screening with CNS imaging studies (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) is required only if clinically indicated or if the subject has a history of CNS metastases
  • gastrointestinal abnormalities that may increase the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding including, but not limited to:

    • Active peptic ulcer disease
    • Known intraluminal metastatic lesion/s with risk of bleeding
    • Inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease), or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation
    • History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment
  • Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities that may affect absorption of product including, but not limited to:

    • Malabsorption syndrome
    • Major resection of the stomach or small bowel
  • Presence of uncontrolled infection
  • interval (QTc) > 480 msecs using Bazett's formula
  • History of any one or more of the following cardiovascular conditions within the past 6 months:

    • Cardiac angioplasty or stenting
    • Myocardial infarction
    • Unstable angina
    • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery
    • Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease
  • Class III or IV congestive heart failure, as defined by the (NYHA)
  • Poorly controlled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure [SBP] of >= 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] of >= 90mmHg); note: initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medication(s) is permitted prior to study entry; following antihypertensive medication initiation or adjustment, blood pressure (BP) must be re-assessed three times at approximately 2-minute intervals; at least 24 hours must have elapsed between anti-hypertensive medication initiation or adjustment and BP measurement; these three values should be averaged to obtain the mean diastolic blood pressure and the mean systolic blood pressure; the mean SBP/DBP ratio must be \< 140/90 mmHg
  • History of cerebrovascular accident including (TIA), pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months; note: subjects with recent DVT who have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks are eligible
  • Prior major surgery or trauma within 28 days prior to first dose of study drug and/or presence of any non-healing wound, fracture, or ulcer (procedures such as catheter placement not considered to be major)
  • Evidence of active bleeding or bleeding diathesis
  • Known endobronchial lesions and/or lesions infiltrating major pulmonary vessels that increase the risk of pulmonary hemorrhage
  • Hemoptysis in excess of 2.5 mL (or one half teaspoon) within 8 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other condition that could interfere with subject's safety, provision of , or compliance to study procedures
  • Unable or unwilling to discontinue use of prohibited medications for at least 14 days or five half-lives of a drug (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study drug and for the duration of the study; administration of any non-oncologic investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives whichever is longer prior to receiving the first dose of study treatment
  • Treatment with any of the following anti-cancer therapies:

    • Radiation therapy, surgery or tumor embolization within 14 days prior to the first dose of pazopanib OR
    • Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, investigational therapy or hormonal therapy within 14 days (or 28 days in the case of monoclonal antibody therapy) prior to the first dose of pazopanib.
    • Any prior treatment with pazopanib.
    • Prior treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting agents other than pazopanib (eg. sorafenib, sunitinib, and bevacizumab) in the metastatic setting. Prior use of such agents in the or adjuvant setting is permitted.
    • Any prior treatment with gemcitabine for metastatic disease. Prior use of gemcitabine in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting is permitted.
  • Any ongoing toxicity from prior anti-cancer therapy that is > grade 1 and/or that is progressing in severity, except alopecia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(28)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (gemcitabine hydrochloride and pazopanib hydrochloride)

    Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and pazopanib hydrochloride PO on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Drug: Gemcitabine · Drug: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride · Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Drug: Pazopanib · Drug: Pazopanib Hydrochloride

  • Active comparator
    Arm II (gemcitabine hydrochloride, placebo)

    Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and placebo PO on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who experience disease progression may receive single-agent pazopanib hydrochloride PO daily. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Drug: Gemcitabine · Drug: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride · Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Drug: Pazopanib · Drug: Pazopanib Hydrochloride · Other: Placebo Administration

Interventions

  • Given IV

    Also known as: dFdC, dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine

  • Given IV

    Also known as: dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine Hydrochloride, FF 10832, FF-10832, FF10832, Gemcitabine HCI, Gemzar, LY-188011, LY188011

  • OtherLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

    Correlative studies

  • Given PO

    Also known as: GW786034

  • Given PO

    Also known as: GW786034B, Votrient

  • OtherPlacebo Administration

    Given PO

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Compared using a one-sided Gehan-Wilcoxon test stratified by sarcoma subtype. Kaplan-Meier estimates for each treatment arm will be presented with the estimated hazard ratios and their associated confidence intervals. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (target lesions), or measurable increase in non-target lesions (unequivocal progression), or appearance of one or more new lesions.

    Time frame: Calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented progression or death, whichever occurs first, or until time of last contact if no progression or death occurred, assessed up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) for a Sub-group of Patients Treated With Open-label Pazopanib Hydrochloride Following Administration of Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in the Cross-over Portion of This Study

    Participants who progress during treatment and are found to be part of the gemcitabine+placebo arm after unblinding are eligible to receive open-label pazopanib with gemcitabine. This is the crossover population. Statistical analysis is exploratory and requires sufficient crossover participants to assess Kaplan-Meier estimated hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval. This represents the participants second progression. In both cases progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (target lesions), or measurable increase in non-target lesions (unequivocal progression), or appearance of one or more new lesions. First progression uses the smallest sum on study as a reference; progression for the crossover population uses first progression measurements as the reference.

    Time frame: Calculated as the time from receiving open-labeled pazopanib hydrochloride to the next documented progression or death whichever occurs first, assessed up to 3 years

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Best Overall Objective Response (CR+PR)

    Response is evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, where RECIST combines assessments for target, non-target and presence of new lesions. Best Overall Objective Response is the sum of all CR+PR divided by all randomized participants, where the strongest recorded response is used for the evaluation (CR\>PR\>SD\>PD). Objective response (CR+PR) requires at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter target lesions (with respective to the baseline sum); disappearance of all or persistence of one or more non-target lesions, maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits, and no new lesions. Estimated odds ratio of best overall objective response are reported with 95% confidence interval for the two histologic sarcoma subgroups (liposarcoma vs all other eligible soft tissue sarcoma subtypes). One-sided proportions test is used to determine whether best overall objective response is greater for the gemcitabine plus pazopanib group.

    Time frame: Best overall objective response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence assessed up to 3 years

  3. Overall Survival

    Two treatment arms will be compared using a one-sided log-rank test stratified by sarcoma subtype and study site. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the survival curves for each treatment arm will be presented with the estimated hazard ratios and their associated confidence interval.

    Time frame: From randomization to death due to any cause, or until last patient contact if the patient did not die, assessed up to 3 years

07

Results

Posted Feb 9, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo
Started2925
Crossover to open-label pazopanib014
Completed1523
Not completed142
Withdrew: Death20
Withdrew: Adverse event61
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Physician decision21
Withdrew: Protocol-defined delay > 3 weeks30

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

Compared using a one-sided Gehan-Wilcoxon test stratified by sarcoma subtype. Kaplan-Meier estimates for each treatment arm will be presented with the estimated hazard ratios and their associated confidence intervals. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (target lesions), or measurable increase in non-target lesions (unequivocal progression), or appearance of one or more new lesions.

Time frame:
Calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented progression or death, whichever occurs first, or until time of last contact if no progression or death occurred, assessed up to 3 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo
All randomized4.5 (3.0 to 8.5)1.6 (1.4 to 4.3)
Liposarcoma8.9 (4.3 to NA)1.5 (1.0 to NA)
Other Sarcoma4.4 (3.0 to 8.8)2.2 (1.4 to 4.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · Gehan-Wilcoxon · p = 0.017
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · Gehan-Wilcoxon · p = 0.195
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · Gehan-Wilcoxon · p = 0.079
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) for a Sub-group of Patients Treated With Open-label Pazopanib Hydrochloride Following Administration of Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in the Cross-over Portion of This Study

Participants who progress during treatment and are found to be part of the gemcitabine+placebo arm after unblinding are eligible to receive open-label pazopanib with gemcitabine. This is the crossover population. Statistical analysis is exploratory and requires sufficient crossover participants to assess Kaplan-Meier estimated hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval. This represents the participants second progression. In both cases progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (target lesions), or measurable increase in non-target lesions (unequivocal progression), or appearance of one or more new lesions. First progression uses the smallest sum on study as a reference; progression for the crossover population uses first progression measurements as the reference.

Time frame:
Calculated as the time from receiving open-labeled pazopanib hydrochloride to the next documented progression or death whichever occurs first, assessed up to 3 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) for a Sub-group of Patients Treated With Open-label Pazopanib Hydrochloride Following Administration of Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in the Cross-over Portion of This Study
monthsCrossover From Gemcitabine + Placebo to Gemcitabine + Open-label Pazopanib
Progression-free Survival (PFS) for a Sub-group of Patients Treated With Open-label Pazopanib Hydrochloride Following Administration of Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in the Cross-over Portion of This Study3.0 (1.3 to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Best Overall Objective Response (CR+PR)

Response is evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, where RECIST combines assessments for target, non-target and presence of new lesions. Best Overall Objective Response is the sum of all CR+PR divided by all randomized participants, where the strongest recorded response is used for the evaluation (CR\>PR\>SD\>PD). Objective response (CR+PR) requires at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter target lesions (with respective to the baseline sum); disappearance of all or persistence of one or more non-target lesions, maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits, and no new lesions. Estimated odds ratio of best overall objective response are reported with 95% confidence interval for the two histologic sarcoma subgroups (liposarcoma vs all other eligible soft tissue sarcoma subtypes). One-sided proportions test is used to determine whether best overall objective response is greater for the gemcitabine plus pazopanib group.

Time frame:
Best overall objective response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence assessed up to 3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Best Overall Objective Response (CR+PR)
percentage of participantsGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo
All randomized participants6.9 (0.9 to 22.8)8.0 (1.0 to 26.0)
Liposarcoma participants22.2 (2.8 to 60)0 (NA to NA)
Other sarcoma participants0 (NA to NA)11.1 (1.4 to 34.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · One-sided Proportions Test · p = 0.5 (Yate's continuity correction was applied because of the number of subjects and successes (n = 4))
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · One-sided Proportion Test · p = 0.3 (Yate's continuity correction was applied because of small number of participants (n = 16) and successes (n = 2).)
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · One-sided Proportion Test · p = 0.8 (Yate's continuity correction was applied because of the small number of participants and successes (n = 2).)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Two treatment arms will be compared using a one-sided log-rank test stratified by sarcoma subtype and study site. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the survival curves for each treatment arm will be presented with the estimated hazard ratios and their associated confidence interval.

Time frame:
From randomization to death due to any cause, or until last patient contact if the patient did not die, assessed up to 3 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo
All Randomized11.0 (9.6 to 20.7)15.6 (6.1 to 27.0)
Liposarcoma participants20.5 (11.0 to NA)5.7 (3.5 to NA)
Other Sarcoma participants10.2 (7.6 to 20.7)17.7 (7.6 to 30.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · Gehan-Wilcoxon · p = 0.481
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · Gehan-Wilcoxon · p = 0.353
  • Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride vs Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo · Gehan-Wilcoxon · p = 0.408

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected up 30 days after the last dose of study drugs while participant was in that Arm/Group. All-Cause Mortality was assessed up to 3 years. For SAEs and OAEs, the Gem+Pazo group was assessed up to 32.1 months; Gem+Placebo participants were assessed up to 36.0 months (30 days after progression). If Gem+Placebo participants crossed over to open-label Pazo after progression, any additional AEs were collected under the crossover arm (up to 16.6 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib Hydrochloride23/29 (79.3%)8/29 (27.6%)25/29 (86.2%)
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Placebo10/11 (90.9%)6/25 (24%)14/25 (56%)
Crossover From Gemcitabine Plus Placebo to Gemcitabine Plus Open-label Pazopanib11/14 (78.6%)5/14 (35.7%)9/14 (64.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent serious events
EventGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboCrossover From Gemcitabine Plus Placebo to Gemcitabine Plus Open-label Pazopanib
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/291/251/14
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders0/290/251/14
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/290/251/14
Gastric perforationGastrointestinal disorders0/290/251/14
Heart failureCardiac disorders2/291/251/14
PainGeneral disorders0/290/251/14
Tumor painNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/290/251/14
Ejection fraction decreasedInvestigations2/290/251/14
FeverGeneral disorders1/290/251/14
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/290/251/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboCrossover From Gemcitabine Plus Placebo to Gemcitabine Plus Open-label Pazopanib
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations12/299/251/14
HypertensionVascular disorders5/290/251/14
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/291/252/14
FatigueGeneral disorders2/290/252/14
HypoalbuminemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/291/252/14
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations4/290/250/14
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations4/290/250/14
White blood cell decreasedInvestigations4/291/250/14
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/293/250/14
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations3/291/250/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboTotal
Median63 (55 to 70)56 (48 to 66)60 (50.3 to 68)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboTotal
Female141630
Male15924
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboTotal
Asian101
White252449
Unknown/Not Reported314
Histology
Histology(Participants)Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboTotal
Liposarcoma9716
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS)9514
Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS)358
Synovial Sarcoma336
Other Sarcoma(s)5510
Number Prior Treatments
Number Prior Treatments(Treatments)Gemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus Pazopanib HydrochlorideGemcitabine Hydrochloride Plus PlaceboTotal
Median1 (1 to 3)1 (1 to 3)1 (1 to 3)
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hattinger CM, Patrizio MP, Magagnoli F, Luppi S, Serra M. An update on emerging drugs in osteosarcoma: towards tailored therapies? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2019 Sep;24(3):153-171. doi: 10.1080/14728214.2019.1654455. Epub 2019 Aug 14. PubMed 31401903 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2012 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 91 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2021, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2012
First posted
Feb 14, 2012
StartActual
Mar 13, 2012
Primary completionActual
Oct 31, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 31, 2019
Results first posted
Feb 9, 2021
Last update
Sep 27, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01532687
Responsible party
Christopher Ryan (Principal Investigator, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 14, 2012
Start date
Mar 13, 2012
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2019
Completion
Oct 31, 2019
Results posted
Feb 9, 2021
Last update
Sep 27, 2021

Study contacts

Christopher W Ryan
principal investigator · OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Gemcitabine · Pazopanib

Start the discussion