ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT01530373Updated Mar 5, 2026

Solifenacin Compared to Clonidine for Reducing Hot Flashes Among Breast Cancer Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of solifenacin and Clonidine in Hot Flashes and Breast Cancer, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Hot flashes present a considerable problem for many breast cancer patients; these symptoms may be intensified by hormonal therapies, such as aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen. This study examines the value of solifenacin (a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist) in reducing hot flashes, compared with clonidine (a medication often used for treating hot flashes).

Read the detailed description

There has been considerable interest in developing new treatment strategies for managing hot flashes among women with breast cancer, in view of the limitations associated with currently available treatments. This randomized study evaluates the safety and efficacy of 3 weeks of solifenacin compared to 3 weeks of clonidine, for women receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy (aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen) for breast cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hot Flashes
  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • hot flashes
  • breast cancer
  • aromatase inhibitors
  • solifenacin
  • clonidine
  • quality of life
03

In context

Hot Flashes

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Hot Flashes; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 90 across 306 interventional studies indexed under Hot Flashes.

Browse Hot Flashes studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 399 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with a history of invasive breast cancer or DCIS
  • Currently taking aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen
  • Not receiving hormone replacement therapy for minimum of one month
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Self-reported hot flashes at least fourteen times per week
  • Self-reported hot flashes for at least one month
  • If receiving non-tricyclic antidepressants (venlafaxine, paroxetine, citalopram, sertraline, etc.) or gabapentin, no change in regimen in past 4 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving any other treatment for hot flashes within the past month, including estrogens, progestins, androgens, or gabapentin.
  • Current use of clonidine or solifenacin. (If patients have been off of these for one month, then they are eligible)
  • History of severe renal or moderate or severe hepatic impairment, as indicated by physical exam and medical record
  • Concurrent or planned chemotherapy or radiotherapy (within next 3 months)
  • Currently receiving tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, barbiturates, pimozide.
  • Currently using inducers (i.e., aminoglutethimide, carbamazepine, dexamethasone, efavirenz, ethosuximide, griseofulvin, modafinil, nafcillin, nevirapine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenylbutazone, phenytoin, primidone, rifabutin, rifampin, rifapentine, St. John's Wort, sulfadimidine, sulfinpyrazone, troglitazone) or potent CYP3A4 inhibitors (i.e., chloramphenicol, clarithromycin, erythromycin, imatinib mesylate, indinavir sulfate, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazoldone, nelfinavir mesylate, ritonavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin).
  • Uncontrolled or poorly controlled narrow-angle glaucoma, urinary retention, gastric retention (evaluated from history \& physical exam and medical record)
  • Hypotension or uncontrolled hypertension (160/95 > BP \< 100/60)
  • Severe coronary insufficiency, conduction disturbances, recent myocardial infarction (within past 3 months), cerebrovascular disease, syncope (evaluated from history \& physical and medical record)
  • History of allergy or adverse reactions to clonidine or solifenacin
  • status > 2 (in bed more than 50% of day)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    solifenacin

    oral solifenacin 5.0 mg daily for 3 weeks

    Drug: solifenacin

  • Active comparator
    clonidine

    oral clonidine 0.1 mg daily for 3 weeks

    Drug: Clonidine

Interventions

  • oral solifenacin 5.0 mg daily for 3 weeks

    Also known as: Vesicare

  • oral clonidine 0.1 mg daily for 3 weeks

    Also known as: Catapres, Dixarit

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: hot flash composite and frequency scores (daily diary)

    to evaluate changes in hot flash composite and frequency scores for women receiving 3 weeks of oral solifenacin compared to those receiving 3 weeks of oral clonidine

    Time frame: from baseline to end of treatment (3 weeks)

  2. Safety: number of clinician-rated adverse events

    to evaluate changes in number of adverse events for women receiving 3 weeks of oral solifenacin compared to those receiving 3 weeks of oral clonidine

    Time frame: from consent until end of study (approximately 9 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. daily functioning (Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference score)

    to evaluate changes in daily functioning (Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Score) for women receiving 3 weeks of oral solifenacin compared to those receiving 3 weeks of oral clonidine

    Time frame: from baseline to end of treatment (3 weeks)

  2. sleep (Insomnia Severity Index)

    To evaluate changes in sleep

    Time frame: from baseline to end of treatment (3 weeks)

  3. quality of life (Illness Cognition Questionnaire, SF-12)

    to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life. (Additional analyses will be observational, exploring associations between quality of life and meaning-making.)

    Time frame: from baseline to end of treatment (3 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 722205, United States
    Recruiting
    • Allen C Sherman, PhD · Contactshermanallenc@uams.edu · 501-686-8700
    • Issam Makhoul, MD · Sub investigator
    • Ronda Henry-Tillman, MD · Sub investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2012, a primary completion of Jul 2027 and a completion of Sep 2028. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2012
First posted
Feb 9, 2012
Start
Feb 2012
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2028
Last update
Mar 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01530373
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Study contacts

Allen C Sherman, PhD
Contact
shermanallenc@uams.edu
501-686-8700
Allen C Sherman, PhD
principal investigator · Universitiy of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Solifenacin

Start the discussion